User talk:Proxima Centauri/Archive 4

Would you like to join, alt.atheism?

Hello, Proxima_Centari. Most of your posts seem to deal with religion. So, here you go:

alt.atheism--Mr.23 (talk) 22:32, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary: another reminder

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Pope Francis does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks!.

Previous reminder for your reference: User_talk:Proxima_Centauri/Archive_3#2013_Savar_building_collapse New worl (talk) 06:13, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Call to Disobedience, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Austrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Did you get my email? Any interest? Jim1138 (talk) 03:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No I didn't, sorry. If your suggestion isn't private please put it here. Proxima Centauri (talk) 06:13, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Zuckerman

I met Phil Zuckerman at the 2013 Humanist Conference. His talk is available here. I was thinking of working on an article. As I did not get a response and saw that you were working on other things, I copied your User:Proxima Centauri/Phil Zuckerman to User:Jim1138/Phil Zuckerman and started working on it. I can copy it back if you would like. Shoot me an email and I'll forward Phil's emails and info to you. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:43, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Wikipedia needs an article about Zuckerman. Proxima Centauri (talk) 08:32, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Want to help? Jim1138 (talk) 08:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if I will have time. Proxima Centauri (talk) 19:28, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Keith O'Brien may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

review, ''[[The Tablet]]'' states, ''"It has been claimed that his sexual misconduct affected his [O'Brien's} governance of the archdiocese and that a culture of cronyism prevailed with power concentrated

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Child sexual abuse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Religious Right (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Explaining

I patrolled your page. I went through the enormously-backlogged list of newly-created pages and confirmed that your page was okay: not spam, not an attack page, not a copyright violation, not any of the other reasons for which I would delete someone's page without asking. Then I clicked "patrolled" to remove it from the list of "pages that have not yet been patrolled", and moved on to the next entry. That's all. DS (talk) 18:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Catholic sex abuse cases in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vatican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Ways Ministry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intrigue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Horst-Wessel-Lied" heads up

Greetings. Following on the revert you did in the section "Use outside Germany", I started a discussion in the article's Talk page, in which I believe you might be interested. Cheers. -The Gnome (talk) 09:15, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter

Twitter should be wary of allowing new account sign-ups from Tor, virtual private networks, proxy servers and disposable email addresses. IMHO, this is almost certainly the cause of the current problems. None of the mainstream media sources have mentioned this so far.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 15:35, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You could consider putting that onto your userpage, you're allowed to express original opinions there. Proxima Centauri (talk) 18:06, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I have been disappointed by the media coverage of this issue so far. It has been clear for a long time that a hard core of Twitter users are abusing multiple accounts and proxies. When they get banned from one account, they move on to the next throwaway account. Unless this is tackled, the "report abuse" button will be of little use. In China, Sina Weibo introduced a rule in 2012 that users must have a verified real life identity. Otherwise, they are not allowed to post on the site. Critics said that this was to censor controversial material about the Chinese government, but as in the UK there had been a problem with hoaxes and nonsense.[1] Google+ has also been criticised for its "real name" policy.[2] Allowing people to post anonymously carries the risk of abuse by idiots, but demanding checks on a person's real life identity when they sign up for an account also has its problems. This is the real issue, and the media has yet to tackle it.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 01:06, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Twitter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mary Beard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PZ Myers

BLP isn't the strongest of my suits, but we should definitely be careful about using Myers' own blog as a "third-party [source] about living people", per WP:SPS - dancing around the details by naming no names but providing clear references for the curious is, I suspect, not enough to legally cover Wikipedia's back. I can't see any obvious press coverage of the allegations he's made, but some third-party blogs may qualify if they have enough editorial oversight to be more than self-published. --McGeddon (talk) 15:55, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Same deal. It doesn't matter whether we say "X accused Y of Z" in X's article, in Y's article, the article about Z or the article about blueberry muffins, it's always a BLP problem if Wikipedia is potentially libelling somebody on the basis of a statement that someone was brave enough to make on their own blog, but which no press source has yet touched. But I'm not sure where the line gets drawn exactly, so I'll raise it on WP:BLP/N. --McGeddon (talk) 17:53, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

...and BLP/N says "Yeah, this is a minefield that we should keep out of this article and the other guy's article for the time being. Wait for the press to sort it out." I've cut the relevant material for now, it can come back as soon as there's a mainstream press source covering it. --McGeddon (talk) 18:32, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The ethical issue is difficult, Myers and I both thought protecting potential victims from a possible serial rapist was of paramount importance. Myers is intelligent and I think it unlikely he would have published without getting legal advice first. Proxima Centauri (talk) 06:09, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As you are aware, linking to an unreliable (all open wikis are inherently) article containing sensitive allegations on a BLP is ill advised. Please do not do so unless you can indicate broad sweeping coverage in reputable sources outside the blogosphere per WP:WELLKNOWN. As detailed here: Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive183#PZ_Myers, wait for the press to sort it out, IRWolfie- (talk) 18:47, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Pope Benedict XVI‎. Thank you. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 15:06, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not important whether that stays in the article or not but there is an unconfirmed rumour. Even a poor source can provide evidence that there is an unconfirmed rumour. Proxima Centauri (talk) 15:14, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

still a rumor, and rumors don't belong on wikipedia. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 15:47, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Green Eggs and Ham, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 14:47, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Leo Cushley. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 20:50, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Leo Cushley, you may be blocked from editing. Mutt Lunker (talk) 08:01, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mutt Lunker: I have restored The Tablet information with some wording improvements. Your claims that it was "original research" or "synthesis" are very dubious. I have also raised the matter on the article's talk page ~ so try to make your case there instead of issuing warnings when doing so does not appear to have much if any justification. Two editors believe that including The Tablet article's information is acceptable so you are currently in the minority on this. Anglicanus (talk) 09:22, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification regarding the synthesis is on the article talk page. Mutt Lunker (talk) 18:42, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Anglicanus, that unpleasant warning was why I haven't edited Wikipedia for a few days. Proxima Centauri (talk) 06:14, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Roman Catholicism in Scotland, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mutt Lunker (talk) 08:27, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What on earth are you doing adding the synthesised material to another article now!? Per my explantion at the Leo Cushley talk page you are using two sources which say two different things to draw a conclusion which neither of them makes. Please take heed of these warnings and mend your ways. If you believe you have a case, take it to the talk pages of the articles but do not pig-headedly just keep adding material which you have been told violates policy without addressing the matter or this can only now be regarded as intentionally disruptive behaviour. Mutt Lunker (talk) 09:04, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

Hello there! I was just passing by to Novelas and got nice memories about the collaboration that did not see the light in wiki format, about Mark and Angie. I would like to tell you I finished the original story offline with a nice ending but I always wonder how would our story had ended.

P.S. It would be really nice if I could contact you through freenode at #LordWikis channel, in case you don't mind.

And I hope this late greeting does not sound to you as strange as it sounds to me. My intention is to greet an old friend.

Davichito (talk) 19:42, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited GlobalPost, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward R. Murrow Award (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Trussell Trust, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Redundancy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Useful resources

It would be good to read

Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 17:09, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've started reading, it should take me a long time. Proxima Centauri (talk) 12:00, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have posted a question on the talk page. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 12:37, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Peterborough ditch murders may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

25864992 Peterborough murders: Joanna Dennehy was mentally ill]</ref> Two men, Gary Richards (known as Gary Stretch}, 47, and Leslie Layton, 36 are on trial charged with a range of crimes assisting Dennehy. Neither

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:59, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know you were atheist!

I am a Traditionalist Catholic who try my best to follow my religion prior to the Second Vatican Council. I am also gay, semi-open and is legally married to my husband of 5 years, who is also a devout Catholic. We receive communion on the tongue at my parish. We do not discuss our homosexuality on Church grounds at all. My priest knows about me but lets us have Holy Communion anyway due to my overwhelming assistance and participation in pious activities at church.

You wouldn't believe me if I told you that Pope Francis himself, sent me and my husband a papal blessing approving our marriage, in Holy Matrimony, in clear writing in Italian.

We knew Vatican politics well and waited for Monsignor Guido Pozzo to be kicked out, and processed the application via Archbishop Konrad Krajeswki. It bears the seal of the Pope's dry stamp as well as the signature of Archbishop Krajewski.

And we also have a written letter (small note) about 4x6" inches from Pope Francis praying for our marriage, including the charity quote from Corinthians. it has his signature at the bottom and the watermark of the papal keys when you hold it against the light.

but I am sworn under penalty of excommunication to keep the documents and my identity in secret, this was clearly stated to us by Tarcisio Bertone. I swear to obey that vow unto my grave.

You probably think I am bullshitting, or this is some sort of a Prank. I DARE you to think I am joking.

-)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Life imprisonment in England and Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Moore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

personal attack in Homosexuality article talk

Hey man this comment is out of line. You need to strike it. There are legit objections to the content you added. I get emotional too sometimes but you gotta own up and back off that. You don't seem to do much work in biomedical topics so maybe aren't aware of how we do stuff, but your content doesn't fly. Legit. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 16:32, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I second what Jytdog says and would like to call your attention to WP:NPA, a policy that expressly forbids such personal attacks. It would be unacceptable to say what you said to any editor, but the fact that you said it to Flyer22, who has a long and distinguished track record of adding neutral, unbiased content across a wide range of articles, is really puzzling. You've been around long enough that one is reluctant to template you, but please consider striking your remark about Bible Belt Christians and being a little more careful not to jump to conclusions about the motivations of other editors. Thanks, and happy editing! Rivertorch (talk) 18:00, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Church of England (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Isolation, Dependency and Deprivation

Welfare state in the United Kingdom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Deprivation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Catholic social teaching (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Communion

Methodist Church of Great Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Inequality

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List of optical illusions#Adding images

I replied at Talk:List of optical illusions#Adding images. Thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:33, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Your addition to John J. Myers has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 04:52, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree copyright violation matters, I checked your edits to the John J. Myers article and note you removed a large chunk which an unregistered user added and I didn't. I hope Wikipedia blocking policy includes taking care that innocent users aren't harassed or blocked for what other users have written. Proxima Centauri (talk) 06:39, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have retracted the warning. Now I see what happened. You removed a large chunk of content and then restored it in this edit. I mistakenly thought you had written it originally. Thanks for pointing out the IP editor's addition in your other diff, it caused me to investigate this more closely. Elizium23 (talk) 06:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Willard Wigan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Lloyd (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Homosexuality and Anglicanism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interpreting sources

You persist in drawing conclusions not actively stated in sources. Oh will you please stop? Mutt Lunker (talk) 09:26, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wrongful execution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Samuel Gross (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Execution of Clayton Lockett may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

''"cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment"'' according to [[international law]], and may have been [[Cruel and unusual punishment] under the [[Constitution of the United states]]. <ref name=Guardian2/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:14, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Candy Crush Saga

Stop using the Yukaichou website on the page. It is not a reliable source. Wikipedia does not exist for you to give out warnings to people on the addictiveness of video games. Also, you need Facebook friends and not money to get past level 35.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding these blog entries (not actual scientific studies) about Candy Crush and brain chemistry. None of it is real science and it is already touched upon in the article. Do not move the "Office of Fair Trading" sentence to the beginning where it does not belong and do not add that massive wall of text saying "IT'S A DANGEROUS DRUG DON'T PLAY THIS GAME" to the article again, please. If you wish to sway people otherwise, start up a discussion on the talk page and gain a consensus for your preferred content.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 15:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The "Office of Fair Trading" sentence was at the beginning before I started editing. See here. Proxima Centauri (talk) 16:00, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Business Insider and Guardian pieces you recently added to the article are irrelevant. Stop trying to add warnings to the article in this manner. The Business Insider one cites something that doesn't even mention Candy Crush but you're just using the fact that "Candy Crush" and "spent life savings" appeared in a single publication as an example of the dangers of this game.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:23, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The whole "game mechanics" section does not even discuss the game mechanics. It's just a bunch of links to a bunch of news articles going "this game is addictive". It does not add anything to the article. Not to mention, your blanket revert undid some other good edits to the page. Do not put the section back onto the article without getting a consensus first.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:30, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pope Francis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Environment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Candy Crush Saga for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:24, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Please read WP:UP#NOT. "Generally, you should avoid substantial content on your user page that is unrelated to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a general hosting service, so your user page is not a personal website. Your user page is about you as a Wikipedian, and pages in your user space should be used as part of your efforts to contribute to the project." and "Unrelated content includes, but is not limited to: Extensive personal opinions on matters unrelated to Wikipedia, wiki philosophy, collaboration, free content, the Creative Commons, etc." Please trim the content accordingly. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:02, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply here rather than simply just restoring your questionable text. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:18, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Red-baiting may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

talks about the needs and rights of [[poverty|poor people]] and criticises corporate greed. See [[[[Pope Francis#Poverty|Francis on poverty]] and [[Pope Francis#Liberation theology|Francis on

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vandalism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

vandals and encourage witnesses to report vandalism. Security cameras are aslo suggested as is {relutantly) making some sites less accessible.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Wiki:

Hello, PC. Would you like to join my new wiki? You're probably not big into paleontology (but judging by the fact that you used to edit at Palaeos), I decided to ask you any ways.--Mrs.23 (talk) 08:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]