User talk:New worl

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, New worl. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 18:09, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re. articles

Nomination of List of people driving Tesla Roadster for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people driving Tesla Roadster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people driving Tesla Roadster until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:10, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revert to Borderline personality disorder article

Hi New worl!

I wanted to check in regarding your revert to the removal of unsourced info on the borderline personality disorder article. Before reverting the edit discussing Lena Dunham's character as having BPD, I first searched for sources to see if I could find one that supported the information, and there are currently no sources supporting it. If you can find a source for that information, that's wonderful -- I myself am always interested in the portrayal of mental health in television and movies! But since there are no sources at present, I think it's appropriate to remove the information from the article. Is that alright on your end?

Thanks, Firecatalta (talk) 23:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Firecatalta,

Thank you for emailing me. I think you are a very diligent Wikipedian. Please go ahead with your plan.

Best regards,

NW

Thanks! I do think your approach is right on the mark. It's far more constructive to support material with sources whenever possible than to just remove it. Have a wonderful Monday!

Best,

Firecatalta (talk) 17:17, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your last revert on Vélib'

Hi,

You reverted my last edit on the article Vélib', stating that my edit was "vandalism". Could you explain why? Slasher-fun (talk) 14:11, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Slasher-fun,

Thank you for asking me. I saw "1" standing alone in a whole line as in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=V%C3%A9lib%27&oldid=549032817

Maybe a typo?

Cheers,

New worl

Rich Lesser

Please add independent references ASAP or this article may be deleted. Please read Wikipedia:Notability.Deb (talk) 10:57, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Deb very much. New worl (talk) 11:44, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rich Lesser AfD

Rich Lesser has now been nominated for deletion from Wikipedia. Qworty (talk) 01:54, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Others

Italics

I noticed you added italics around the quotations in this edit. Why did you do this? A quotation should be indicated by quotation marks and nothing else. Italics are used for emphasis, certain titles, and foreign words, not to denote quotations. Quotation marks are sufficient, and putting italics around quotes are simply wrong and unnecessary, so I ask you to please stop adding them in articles. Thanks, Reywas92^Talk 17:40, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Reywas92,

Thank you for asking me. I think italic would help readers go straight to the quote, which will help them in skimming. It is more helpful in long articles.

Please tell me your opinion.

Thank you. New worl (talk) 02:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's not the purpose of italics. The length of an article doesn't matter; some material in a paragraph is a quote, and some isn't. It isn't our role here to help people skim: perhaps the quote isn't even the most important part of paragraph, and other material would be more helpful for skimming. In http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inner_peace&diff=550298224&oldid=540526457 this edit] to a very short article, the quote is already blocked off, so I don't see what the effect should be. I don't mean to admonish you, but just please don't do it any more. Reywas92^Talk 22:49, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I still believe that italic has many important benefits that have been used fully in Wikipedia. I will think more about this and may make some recommendation in the future. In the end, what is helpful to users will survive and thrive. Cheers, New worl (talk) 05:56, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some handy Wikipedia policies for you to be aware of and try to follow

Hi! Some of your recent edits have indicated that you could benefit from reading the following policies: WP:RS, WP:BURDEN, WP:OWN, WP:EDITWAR, WP:COI, and WP:42. Please let me know if you need further assistance. Thanks, and happy editing! Qworty (talk) 21:59, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Primark, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is exactly what I was talking about when I said:
I'm not sure if that is intended to be some kind of threat and or whom it may be directed at. What I can tell you is that vandalism will not be tolerated and I won't hesitate to report it and let an administrator figure out what your comment above implies. I can also tell you that if I was an administrator on this wiki, I would likely consider that a threat and you would end up blocked.
My comment was in regard to the fact that his wording made me think that he was upset about something, was going to Google every possible piece of unreliable blog stuffs he could find and spam the crap out of the article with useless information. I simply wanted to make clear that would not be allowed as it is WP:POINTy... Technical 13 (talk) 20:26, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Answered here. New worl (talk) 14:00, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Relax and have yourself a cup of tea. Editing Wikipedia is not suppose to be so stressful. I apologize if I seemed BITEy to you at all and I hope our future communications can be positive and rewarding for both of us. Happy Editing! Technical 13 (talk) 00:38, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notifications box replacement prototypes released

Hey New worl; Kaldari has finished scripting a set of potential replacements available to test and give feedback on. Please go to this thread for more detail on how to enable them. Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 14:51, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

Hey, sorry for editing your sandbox. I was trying to be friendly and pass on some useful links, I certainly wasn't intending to annoy or irritate you. It was kinda a peace offering seeing as we've been at loggerheads. No worries. --HighKing (talk) 14:19, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, HighKing. As you can see, I still need to learn many simple things. Have a good day or night! Cheers, New worl (talk) 14:26, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Peace. Hopefully next time we bump into each other we'll be more aligned :-) --HighKing (talk) 14:30, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I hope so. Each of us has only 24 hours a day. The sooner a consensus is reached, the better it is. New worl (talk) 14:35, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sohel Rana (businessman) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sohel Rana (businessman) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sohel Rana (businessman) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JamieSc (talk) 01:57, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rich Lesser

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rich Lesser requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bcg.com/about_bcg/leadership/executive_committee.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 14:28, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Laozi

Category:Zhou Dynasty philosophers is a subcategory of Category:Chinese philosophers... As such, it usually shouldn't also be in the parent category. --Nlu (talk) 14:22, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot

SB

This user lets SuggestBot recommend articles to edit {{{weekly}}}.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Chaplin A Dogs Life.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Chaplin A Dogs Life.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Chaplin - Kid Auto Races in Venice.png

A tag has been placed on File:Chaplin - Kid Auto Races in Venice.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cyberwarfare in China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Computer hacking (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oi

Read the diffs before blindly stabbing the revert button. — Scott • talk 12:07, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

3RR policy

FYI, in case you din't know, there is a policy called WP:3RR. There is a 'bright line' policy against reverting more than 3 times in a 24 hour period. FurrySings (talk) 08:09, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you?

Are you Hispanic/Latino, well my family comes from Perú, and I do not know anything about you, oh, and BTW, why did you gve yourself a name of "New worl"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoymeyahMonlin (talk • contribs) 13:46, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New newsletter for Notifications

Hello

You are subscribing to the Notifications newsletter on English Wikipedia.

That newsletter is now replaced by the monthly and multilingual Collaboration team newsletter, which will include information and updates concerning Notifications but also concerning Flow and Edit Review Improvements.

Please subscribe!

All the best, Trizek (WMF) (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retail Importance Assessment

Hi New worl! Since you're listed as a member of WikiProject: Retailing, wanted to let you know we're currently discussing importance assessment criteria for the project on the talk page. Thanks! Tfkalk (talk) 23:47, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]