User talk:ProtoJeb21

June 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to TRAPPIST-1g, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 16:47, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please refer to MOS:HEADINGS for the proper heading level conventions. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:57, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to TRAPPIST-1g, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 18:25, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ProtoJeb21, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ProtoJeb21! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:08, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Luyten b

The article Luyten b has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:20, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kepler-80d, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Whispe ring 22:28, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Kepler-10.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Praemonitus (talk) 17:55, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No original research

Please stop adding your own views to Wikipedia articles. This is against Wikipedia policy of no original research, see WP:OR. In particular please stop adding a list of planets to the mega-Earth article. There are no references describing these as mega-Earths or even rocky planets, that's just your own interpretation of the data. Fdfexoex (talk) 16:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about K2-187b

Hello, ProtoJeb21,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether K2-187b should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K2-187b .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Lithopsian (talk) 19:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about K2-183b

Hello, ProtoJeb21,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether K2-183b should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K2-183b .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Lithopsian (talk) 21:00, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve K2-157b

Hi, I'm Graeme Bartlett. ProtoJeb21, thanks for creating K2-157b!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Not every exoplanet needs an article. WP:GNG applies, where there should be more than one writing about the planet, with substantial content.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:14, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about K2-157b

Hello, ProtoJeb21,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether K2-157b should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K2-157b .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Lithopsian (talk) 11:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (K2-229b) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating K2-229b, ProtoJeb21!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reviewed, well done, in-depth article. Thanks for creating

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 23:36, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ProtoJeb21. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]