User talk:Prof Wrong

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Wikipedia. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Gwernol 15:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Hebrides. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Bardcom (talk) 18:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gaelic Loans

Yeah, I agree... on the whole it's not a very good page and looks a bit... haphazard. A few of the loans are obvious but there's a few on there which would be difficult to prove. Not sure what to do with the page. Akerbeltz (talk) 13:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

Please read Wikipedia:Talk pages. Wikipedia "Talk" pages are for one thing and one thing only: working out the contents of Wikipedia articles. Not for discussion of the subject of the articles, but the actual contents of them. They are not discussion boards, and anything that is not directly about the article (like your or User:Paul from Michigan's or my opinions about copyright law) is off-topic, and restoring that kind of material is counterproductive to the goals of the project. -JasonAQuest (talk) 03:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hawaiian English ... link

I’ve reverted it because the article Hawaiian English redirects to Hawaiian Pidgin, which is a different thing. Perhaps, the best solution is to write an article about the English variety spoken in Hawaii over the redirect page, to avoid future misleading redirects. Regards. Ten Islands (talk) 17:56, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Míl Espáine

Great work on this, any chance of any references? Thanks. dougweller (talk) 18:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ain't

Judging by the comments here on your talk page, you seem to have a misunderstanding of our policies on verifiability and citing sources. Please do read those policies and become familiar with them. Swayback Maru (talk) 15:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Scottish Gaelic task force needs you!

Your participation in the Scottish Gaelic task force which is part of Wikiproject Scotland would be greatly appreciated.
If you are interested, please visit the task force's page in order to see how you would be able to participate.

JoshuaJohnLee ^{talk softly, please} 20:28, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Scottish Gaelic

I understand your argument, but now that there is an ongoing discussion you should not continue to revert until consensus had been reached. On a side note, WP:RETAIN does not relate to differences like this, but as to whether whole articles are written in British/American English, so that is not a valid reason to keep changing to "or". Please see the discussion on the talk page and wait before you edit again. Caledones ^{talk softly, please} 01:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Slime Forest Adventure

The article Slime Forest Adventure has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Software with no evidence of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 23:56, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. When you recently edited Slime Forest Adventure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sonic the Hedgehog (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"get along little Doorkey Ar-gee"

[1]. Regards. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Loch Ard (ship) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:57, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Savvyjack23 (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Savvyjack23 (talk) 08:08, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Prof Wrong. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Prof Wrong. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Prof Wrong. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]