User talk:Prodipm

Welcome!

Hello, Prodipm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 07:01, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HDRPlayPictures.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HDRPlayPictures.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:OfficialPosterOfSaatRang.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:OfficialPosterOfSaatRang.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HDRPlayPictures.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HDRPlayPictures.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HDRPlayPictures.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HDRPlayPictures.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:SaatRangOfficialPoster.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:SaatRangOfficialPoster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at HDR Play Pictures, you may be blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 14:55, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HDR Play Pictures. Do not blank or remove AFDs Praxidicae (talk) 14:58, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Prodipm. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 19:26, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prodipm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know why my account has been blocked from Wikipedia, I don't have any idea what happened, I tried to undo the deletion action twice, but after getting two warnings, I did not make any changes, I don't have any link with the changes made by any other user. I am true to myself and I'm here to contribute legitimate information on Wikipedia. I would like to request to unblock my account. Prodipm (talk) 19:41, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for violating WP:SOCK. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:45, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prodipm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1. I understand why I got blocked from editing Wikipedia, I would like to assure the administrator that it was not my fault. 2. I am not here on Wikipedia to vandalize any pages 3. I want to assure the administrator that I would continue to contribute useful information to the readers. 4. I apologize for the inconvenience caused to the administrators. Prodipm (talk) 19:53, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you understand why you were blocked, you should be able to tell us why you were blocked, also explain how it's not your fault that you were abusing multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 20:07, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prodipm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The story started by me getting a notification that an article HDR Play Pictures is getting deleted due to Notability, I tried undoing the action twice and got a notice that I might get blocked without any further notice, I did not do anything more than that. Two other Users that I don't even have any link with did something wrong with Wikipedia's regulations, which I am not liable to. I am using Wikipedia for couple of months and have made hundreds of edits on Wikipedia after researching about the topic, I respect all the Users who edit on Wikipedia and I am true to the community. I have shared good relationships with all the Wikipedia users and have never abused anyone in the past, I would like to clarify that I have not abused any user on Wikipedia and request the Administrator to please unblock my account. Prodipm (talk) 20:20, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed to Dipk1983 and WikCheck. Talk page access revoked, WP:UTRS is available for appeal.Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:25, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Prodipm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #26074 was submitted on Jul 24, 2019 20:40:07. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 20:40, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SaatRangOfficialPoster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SaatRangOfficialPoster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:HDRPlayPicturesLogo.png

The file File:HDRPlayPicturesLogo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused logo, which would be out of scope on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:HDRPlayPicturesLogo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HDRPlayPicturesLogo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]