User talk:Procyclone25

Visit the NHC and get ready for editing. Also please visit JTWC. And enjoy the 21st century. And remember to enjoy the good things in life!

Yes

The reason I am reverting your edits on the hurricane season article is because that is for the Entire Season--Wyatt2049 | (talk) 16:30, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok so wth is an ace value? Procyclone25 (talk) 16:54, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello????? Procyclone25 (talk) 17:04, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

He won't be notified unless you do {{ping|Wyatt2049}}. I already did that for you. @Wyatt2049:INeedSupport ^:V 17:08, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ask you questions here!

Respond below Procyclone25 (talk) 16:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Procyclone25, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Procyclone25! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2019 Atlantic hurricane season, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 16:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback

What’s your feedback? Procyclone25 (talk) 03:09, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Procyclone25 (talk) 16:33, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello, I'm CurtNeiMeng. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 1979 Pacific typhoon season, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Curt内蒙 (talk) 17:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit does indeed seem to match the cited information on the article for Typhoon Tip, however having read through a number of the Typhoon Season articles, it seems that the generally accepted figure for 'Maximum Winds' is the '10 minutes sustained' figure, not the 1 minute sustained. So I would suggest leaving the figure for Typhoon Tip as it is

Thanks --Curt内蒙 (talk) 18:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10-minute sustained winds

Please do not remove the 10-minute sustained winds from Pacific typhoon season articles. We use 10-minute winds to follow the convention used by the Japan Meteorological Agency, which is the Regional Specialized Meteorological Center for the West Pacific basin appointed by the World Meteorological Organization. These RSMCs are considered the ultimate sources for tropical cyclone data on Wikipedia. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 04:53, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

‘1 minute sustained winds is the best way to go’

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1979 Pacific typhoon season. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. ‘Reporting you as vandalism is the best way to go.’ 🐱💬 15:54, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism is not anything like what I did Procyclone25 (talk) 18:59, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may not see what you are doing as vandalism, and you're entitled to have an opinion on whether we should use '10-min' or '1-min', but article space is not the place to express this opinion, since you have already been warned by myself and others to stick to the 10-min figures. If you want to explain why you think 1-min is a better parameter to use, you're welcome to raise it on a talk page. But continuing to edit article space to push your agenda will lead to you losing your editing privileges Curt内蒙 19:22, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Meow: This is very far from the first time you need to read this, so please do: WP:NOTVAND. Procyclone25's edits are in error, but not in bad faith.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:49, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

So I am not intentionally doing it, and it is not a hoax, I get you can’t trust websites for information but some of these websites that say different things other than the website I use because the one I am using is the most updated website so vandalism is a very strong and misused word in this situation. Btw I already looked on what they call “vandalism and because of a few misunderstandings doesn’t mean it is intended to be wrong of rude funny or even purposely annoying Procyclone25 (talk) 18:42, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding edit

Could you explain why you restored vandalism to Walt Anderson (American football)?-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]

I just wanted to see if the reverted finally worked sorry though

September 2019

Hello, I'm CurtNeiMeng. An edit that you recently made to Walt Anderson (American football) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Curt内蒙 16:41, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Moon, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:34, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is my thing about it not being permanent fine? Procyclone25 (talk) 00:31, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]