Jump to content

User talk:AProcter GB eng

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Procterbot)


This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Procterbot, contains the suffix "-bot", which is generally reserved for authorized bot accounts

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

  1. Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
  2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
  3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.
If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 11:47, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AProcter GB eng (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Decline reason:

Sorry, we already have an AdamProcter. If that's your account, you are welcome to just start using it. If not, you are welcome to pick a different username. Yamla (talk) 12:16, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AProcter GB eng (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Decline reason:

No, that's too similar. Pick a new username. Yamla (talk) 12:57, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New name

[edit]

AProcter_GB_eng Procterbot (talk) 12:41, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

AProcter GB eng (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Accept reason:

I have renamed your account from "Procterbot" to "AProcter GB eng", and unblocked it. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 15:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Doug Belshaw

[edit]

Hello AProcter GB eng,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Doug Belshaw for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]