User talk:Privateclub312

Welcome!

Hi Privateclub312! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 05:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you my friend :) Privateclub312 (talk) 05:34, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Firehouse Studios moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Firehouse Studios. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Privateclub312. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2A01:4C8:B3:B050:71DD:2B8D:47B5:2B0A (talk) 07:09, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the case, I'm new to this platform, but I have read through the terms clearly and am working to get the information regarding the entire Chicago Hip-Hop scene up to date, thank you for reaching out. I am a long time fan with no direct connections with any of the subjects I am writing on, if you'd like to chat more about our similar interests I would love to, please email me. Privateclub312 (talk) 07:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All of your edits up to the point that I posted that message were article creations of Firehouse Studios and related people. Where did you get all of the personal photos of people connected with Firehouse Studios? 2A01:4C8:B3:B050:71DD:2B8D:47B5:2B0A (talk) 07:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Directly from their Instagram? I just commented and asked for permission... Privateclub312 (talk) 14:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Mrwriterman11 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mrwriterman11. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. firefly ( t · c ) 15:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Privateclub312 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I see i was banned for sock-puppeting . I would like you to re-consider this ban as I am not related to that other profile MrWriterman11, Firehouse Studios, Mafia Beatz, TrenchMobb or any of the subjects I have wrote about. My only bias is that I am a long time follower of Firehouse Studios' work and the Chicago Hip-Hop scene and I noticed Mafia Beatz posted a Wikipedia page the other week and when I went to click on the link he shared it was removed.

I signed up for Wikipedia with the goal in mind of getting his attention by getting him and the notable artists he works with published with published on Wikipedia, I hoped to get their attention in their comments and possibly become a writer for their company. That is my only bias and connection to the topic. I tried to read through all of the terms and rules of Wikipedia and it seemed to me that those article were ready to go as they have had multiple albums with major record labels and have multiple sources to support it.

I really tried to make an effort of good faith, and get the hang of the Wikipedia platform by completing 30 of the suggested edits before I felt comfortable publishing. If you could unban me I would be very much appreciative and I am completely open to hearing out what was wrong with any of my submissions and becoming a better, valued member of the Wikipedia community.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. You've created multiple accounts just today. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Privateclub312 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I never stated that Doyoudoyou49 or the account today wasn't mine. I tested the account creation to see what the block message was. You can see a clear difference in writing styles between the previous editor Mrwriterman11 and my work. I can assure you that I am not sock-puppeting, Doyoudoyou49 is my school computer and this is my home computer. I want to reiterate that I tried to in good faith read the terms of service and read that it was not against the rules to make multiple accounts before making it. I understand the importance of integrity and these protocols but if you investigate this a little more you'll see clearly that we are not the same. I explained my bias in regards to the cause of the checkuser posts, I am an independent party who noticed the original wiiki taken down via social media and decided to work on it, hence the connection.

Decline reason:

You can't simultaneously admit to sockpuppetry and deny sockpuppetry. It seems like you simply don't understand or are trying to mislead us. Yamla (talk) 20:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.