Jump to content

User talk:Pringles3000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Pringles3000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 03:41, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Oh thanks. I've read your links and seem to have caught on how to edit here. This Visual editing app is quite irritating though, so I've decided to switchover to the other one which is quite straightforward. Here goes nothing. 03:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

There is an open discussion on this issue on talk:German battleship Bismarck. Please join the discussion. Please leave the content until wp:consensus is reached. See wp:BRD thank you Jim1138 (talk) 04:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 16:04, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:BRD. Since you were the one who changed the content (the "B"), I was the reverting one ("R") and now we discuss ("D"), we don't revert back. I started discussion here. --Muhandes (talk) 16:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just realized you were already warned about edit warring and pointed to WP:BRD and WP:CONSENSUS, so you are probably familiar with it by now. --Muhandes (talk) 16:20, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]