User talk:Primacag

Welcome

Hello, Primacag, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Viriditas 09:01, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

Hi Primacag. Your edits keep popping up on watchlist, and they're great! Good work! One thing, though: you shouldn't put comments in articles like I noticed you did here[1] and here[2] (e.g. "<from where??>"). It's best to make these requests on the article's talk page: other editors are more likely to see them there and answer, and it keeps the article itself looking professional. There are, however, a few templates you can use in article space.To request a citation, you can add {{cn}} or {{fact}} after the unsourced statement. This renders as: bla bla bla^{[citation needed]}. Other useful templates are {{who}}, {{when}} , and {{clarifyme}} which render as ^[who?], ^[when?], and ^{[clarification needed]}, and you can add a invisible comment in the article using . Thanks and keep up the good work.Yilloslime (t) 17:31, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yilloslime, Thanks. I am learning where the right buttons are for getting things done. Any direction welcomed. Don't be bashful. Primacag

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:34, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lindane

Based on the other articles you've been editing and the kind of work you've been doing on them, I think you might enjoy cleaning up Lindane. I've already trimmed, tweaked, and excised a lot[3] but there's a ton more work to do. Yilloslime (t) 02:51, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yillo: Thanks. I read it. It looks grammatically good, which is the extent to which I am qualified to critique this subject. I was collecting information for a book chapter and couldn't stand the poor grammer of the other pages. I will be appearing in water and other ag topics in the near future. Any other suggestions you have for me to look at welcomed. The page I am most concerned about is the Environmental Science article that has been gutted and juvenilized by some zealous "scientists" who only know how to measure and sample and know little about how to regulate and value the environment. primacag

Shikimic Acid

You mentioned that the sentence "Although shikimic acid is present in most autotrophic organisms, it is a biosynthetic intermediate and generally found in very low concentrations" needs to be clarified in laymans terms; I believe it does not need a change as its meaning is very clear if you have any grasp of basic biology, and articles on each "scientific" term are readily available. In case you were actually wondering what it means, here is a rough "translation": "Although shikimic acid is present in most organisms that make their own food(plants), they change it into something else so there isn't much of it present at any particular time." As you can see, a "laymans" translation is bulky and doesn't really clarify as much as just finding out what the few uncommon words mean. ~ Zeofar (talk) 20:19, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sediment

A while back mentioned a number of changes that should take place in the article on Sediment. I'm not ready to take on that project right now, but based on your comments, perhaps you would. Awickert (talk) 05:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aluminium

Thanks for working on this article.

While you're at it, can you please repair the broken wikilinks, references, and subscripted chemical formulae that was correctly formatted prior to your edits? --Rifleman 82 (talk) 17:26, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your quote "First problem.... the article reads like a bad freshman college or high school level composition." Well, that is how most of our articles are written - we do not have a staff of professional editors. We rely on voluntary editors. So be constructive and get to work! --Smokefoot (talk) 20:21, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is constructive to tell people how bad some of the writing is so that they will aspire to better. It is not professional to whine about it being pointed out. Too many people are defensive about what they should be working on themselves. Avram Primack (talk) 19:10, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We look forward to see your words turn into action! Go for it. --Smokefoot (talk) 00:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

At Talk:Population_pyramid#The_labels_on_the_pyramids_are_wrong.2C_and_the_explanations_pass_over_important_points. The discussion is slow but current :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fraxinus uhdei

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Fraxinus uhdei requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:50, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Styrax ramirezii

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Styrax ramirezii requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 20:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Persea hintoni

Hello Primacag,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Persea hintoni for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Lithopsian (talk) 20:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Plants of the Reserva de la Biosfera Manantlan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zea. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 2 September 2016 (UTC) Fixed. Thank you ~~[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Plants of the Reserva de la Biosfera Manantlan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pines. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 26 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Plants of the Reserva de la Biosfera Manantlan page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Plants of the Reserva de la Biosfera Manantlan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prestonia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Primacag. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hello, I'm 68.233.214.74. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Preceding undated comment added 19:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Plants of the Reserva de la Biosfera Manantlan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mabea and Croton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Plants of the Reserva de la Biosfera Manantlan

added links pointing to Lotus, Gaya, Senna, Pavonia and Zapoteca

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Plants of the Reserva de la Biosfera Manantlan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sida. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Primacag. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]