User talk:PressgirlV

PressgirlV, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi PressgirlV! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bukky Leo (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rusalkii were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bukky Leo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bukky Leo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 14:05, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bukky Leo (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fandom is not a reliable source. See WP:RS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bukky Leo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bukky Leo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 (talk) 00:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bukky Leo (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Paul W were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notability requires substantial coverage in reliable, independent sources (see WP:RS) - for example, newspapers and magazines with good editorial and fact-checking reputations. The sourcing for this article, such as it is, is almost solely by pieces by the article's subject (ie: not independent). In biographies of living people, all significant statements need to be evidenced by reliable sources, but large portions of the article are devoid of inline references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bukky Leo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bukky Leo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W (talk) 08:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bukky Leo (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi.

I'm sorry, but none of the sourcing here helps the subject meet our general notability guidelines nor WP:NORG at this point. The sources are either primary (event promoters) or from non-notable music publications or blog-like websites.

We need *significant* coverage in notable media outlets or by notable publishers. Examples: magazine and newspaper interviews and features about Bukky Leo; books written ABOUT Bukky Leo; television and radio features ABOUT Bukky Leo. If their music is so successful then they should have chart placements or major press coverage.

If those are available, please improve this submission. If not, then it appears to be WP:TOOSOON for Bukky Leo, to have their own Wikipedia article.

I hope you will consider improving existing Wikipedia content about other subjects of interest!

If you have any questions please ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bukky Leo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bukky Leo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 18:13, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bukky Leo (October 18)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by MaxnaCarta was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Per previous feedback

MaxnaCarta (talk) 00:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

As previously advised, your edits, such as those at Draft:Bukky Leo and Carla Marie Williams, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:PressgirlV, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=PressgirlV|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:58, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I will do that now. I have only just seen this message from you.

For the record I have not ever received any payment from Bukky Leo or Carla Marie Williams, they are both friends who I have helped out.

Carla Marie Williams' Wiki page was already created by a former colleague at the BBC, Carla needed some help adding her discography, which I did as a favour to her.

In the case of Bukky Leo, he is a lovely old man, who has paid his dues and contributed greatly to Afrobeat and music overall, he was very much in need and deserving of a Wiki page. He asked me for a favour and I did it for him, I don't charge for this, he is an old man, he doesn't have much money, but he needed my help.

I am a PR consultant by trade, and I sometimes help people, I do quite a bit for people pro bono. I think of it as paying it forward.

Thanks PressgirlV (talk) 21:54, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editing on behalf of a friend is still a form of conflict of interest editing, and given both your professional background and the confluence of sockpuppetry around the articles in question, you should still comply with WP:PAID. You may revise and resubmit a draft through AfC once you disclose appropriately and address the concerns raised by past reviewers of the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't been paid, I don't know who the other accounts are who have made edits, they have nothing to do with me.

I can see why it might look like sockpuppetry, but I don't know how else to show you my innocence.

It's like the Spanish Inquisition tbh LOL.

How would you like me to comply with WP:PAID when I haven't been paid. I will not lie to comply with your policy.

I understand the COI point you make and I have made that disclosure that Carla and Bukky are friends and I have done them a favour, I have also said I understand I have a COI as their friend on my user page.

As I said I have not been paid and I am not an employee.

Is this now appropriate disclosure?

I'm not very familiar with Wiki and I honestly was unaware of these issues or policies.

I don't know what AfC is either.

As for the concerns raised by past reviewers, I feel that they have been addressed, as menttioned there are a number of notable references in the Wiki. PressgirlV (talk) 22:47, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Th COI disclosure on your user page is sufficient for now. Feel free to hit the "Submit this draft for review" whenever you think the draft is ready, which will add it to the WP:AFC queue. I will note that based on technical logs available to checkusers, we have evidence that Draft:Bukky Leo has been edited by other accounts linked to banned paid-editing outfits: I would encourage you to advise your friends to stop trying to buy their way onto Wikipedia, as you can now see first hand that it tends to have the exact opposite of the intended effect. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much Rosguill. I will let Bukky Leo know of your advice and of this conversation. I had no idea the person who contacted him was banned, Bukky told he'd been contacte, I didn't advise him, as I don't work for him! Thank you for accepting my disclosure, that's a relief!

Thanks, Indy PressgirlV (talk) 00:05, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rosguill

The Bukky Leo draft we were talking about back in Jan, was declined again this week, and I thought it was ready for approval, the references on there are notable, The Guardian and Worldwide FM Gilles Peterson, plus all the other references and sizeable discography, is there anything you can do to help? Thanks! PressgirlV (talk) 13:30, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bukky Leo (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xclusivzik was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bukky Leo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Xclusivzik (talk) 20:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I have been dealing with Rosguill, who was the last editor of the Wiki draft, this submission seemed ready for approval, what with The Guardian and Worldwide FM by hugely influential broadcaster Gilles Peterson very notable references, plus all the other references, plus the very sizeable discography. So I was surprised that you have declined it, can you explain why you think The Guardian and Worldwide FM Gilles Peterson are not notable enough? This seems really unfair. PressgirlV (talk) 13:30, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jhelisa Anderson has been accepted

Jhelisa Anderson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JML1148 (talk | contribs) 05:24, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bukky Leo (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources cited are insufficient to establish notability per WP:GNG. If special WP:MUSICBIO notability is being asserted instead, please specify which of the criteria 1-12 is met, and what evidence supports this. Several sources have failed verification, and personal details must be supported by reliable published sources or else removed. Please ensure that the contents are adequately referenced before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bukky Leo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:30, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]