Jump to content

User talk:PressgirlV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PressgirlV, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi PressgirlV! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


Your submission at Articles for creation: Bukky Leo (April 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rusalkii were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Rusalkii (talk) 14:05, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bukky Leo (April 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SK2242 (talk) 00:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bukky Leo (May 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Paul W were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Paul W (talk) 08:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bukky Leo (July 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Missvain (talk) 18:13, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bukky Leo (October 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by MaxnaCarta was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Per previous feedback
MaxnaCarta (talk) 00:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

[edit]
Information icon

As previously advised, your edits, such as those at Draft:Bukky Leo and Carla Marie Williams, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:PressgirlV, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=PressgirlV|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. signed, Rosguill talk 19:58, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I will do that now. I have only just seen this message from you.
For the record I have not ever received any payment from Bukky Leo or Carla Marie Williams, they are both friends who I have helped out.
Carla Marie Williams' Wiki page was already created by a former colleague at the BBC, Carla needed some help adding her discography, which I did as a favour to her.
In the case of Bukky Leo, he is a lovely old man, who has paid his dues and contributed greatly to Afrobeat and music overall, he was very much in need and deserving of a Wiki page. He asked me for a favour and I did it for him, I don't charge for this, he is an old man, he doesn't have much money, but he needed my help.
I am a PR consultant by trade, and I sometimes help people, I do quite a bit for people pro bono. I think of it as paying it forward.
Thanks PressgirlV (talk) 21:54, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Editing on behalf of a friend is still a form of conflict of interest editing, and given both your professional background and the confluence of sockpuppetry around the articles in question, you should still comply with WP:PAID. You may revise and resubmit a draft through AfC once you disclose appropriately and address the concerns raised by past reviewers of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 22:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't been paid, I don't know who the other accounts are who have made edits, they have nothing to do with me.
I can see why it might look like sockpuppetry, but I don't know how else to show you my innocence.
It's like the Spanish Inquisition tbh LOL.
How would you like me to comply with WP:PAID when I haven't been paid. I will not lie to comply with your policy.
I understand the COI point you make and I have made that disclosure that Carla and Bukky are friends and I have done them a favour, I have also said I understand I have a COI as their friend on my user page.
As I said I have not been paid and I am not an employee.
Is this now appropriate disclosure?
I'm not very familiar with Wiki and I honestly was unaware of these issues or policies.
I don't know what AfC is either.
As for the concerns raised by past reviewers, I feel that they have been addressed, as menttioned there are a number of notable references in the Wiki. PressgirlV (talk) 22:47, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Th COI disclosure on your user page is sufficient for now. Feel free to hit the "Submit this draft for review" whenever you think the draft is ready, which will add it to the WP:AFC queue. I will note that based on technical logs available to checkusers, we have evidence that Draft:Bukky Leo has been edited by other accounts linked to banned paid-editing outfits: I would encourage you to advise your friends to stop trying to buy their way onto Wikipedia, as you can now see first hand that it tends to have the exact opposite of the intended effect. signed, Rosguill talk 22:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much Rosguill. I will let Bukky Leo know of your advice and of this conversation. I had no idea the person who contacted him was banned, Bukky told he'd been contacte, I didn't advise him, as I don't work for him! Thank you for accepting my disclosure, that's a relief!
Thanks, Indy PressgirlV (talk) 00:05, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Rosguill
The Bukky Leo draft we were talking about back in Jan, was declined again this week, and I thought it was ready for approval, the references on there are notable, The Guardian and Worldwide FM Gilles Peterson, plus all the other references and sizeable discography, is there anything you can do to help? Thanks! PressgirlV (talk) 13:30, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bukky Leo (March 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xclusivzik was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Xclusivzik (talk) 20:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I have been dealing with Rosguill, who was the last editor of the Wiki draft, this submission seemed ready for approval, what with The Guardian and Worldwide FM by hugely influential broadcaster Gilles Peterson very notable references, plus all the other references, plus the very sizeable discography. So I was surprised that you have declined it, can you explain why you think The Guardian and Worldwide FM Gilles Peterson are not notable enough? This seems really unfair. PressgirlV (talk) 13:30, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jhelisa Anderson has been accepted

[edit]
Jhelisa Anderson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JML1148 (talk | contribs) 05:24, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bukky Leo (August 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:30, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]