User talk:Press4forapharmrep

Welcome!

Hello, Press4forapharmrep!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marquette Benefits & Social Welfare Law Review (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gpkp was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marquette Benefits & Social Welfare Law Review and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marquette Benefits & Social Welfare Law Review, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:42, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Press4forapharmrep! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:42, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marquette Benefits & Social Welfare Law Review (May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marquette Benefits & Social Welfare Law Review and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marquette Benefits & Social Welfare Law Review, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:53, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello Press4forapharmrep. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Press4forapharmrep. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Press4forapharmrep|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 18:51, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @331dot,

I am in no way being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. I was a member of the Law Review as a student two years ago, but it was a completely unpaid role and I am no longer affiliated with it at all. Let me know if this clears things up.

Thank you! Press4forapharmrep (talk) 16:20, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your username suggests that you work for a "pharm rep". Is that true, and do you intend to edit about the rep? 331dot (talk) 17:20, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My username is the same as my reddit username just for my own convenience. I worked as a pharmacy technician for about 5 years before I attended law school, and at that time the automated voice on our phone lines would prompt customers to "press 4 for a pharmacy representative." The username was a play on that because my primary reddit presence was centered around pharm tech stuff, and it was meant to be a pun. I am no longer a pharmacy tech, and I am no longer affiliated with MBSWLR. I'm just an attorney and do not plan on making any edits that promote my own financial gain, whether directly or indirectly. In fact, the information I have provided about MBSWLR is about the extent of what is available online for reference, so I don't plan on making any edits at all unless something substantive changes that would make the page inaccurate in some way.

Let me know if I can make any further assurances. Press4forapharmrep (talk) 20:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to answer. That satisfies matters. 331dot (talk) 20:41, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Marquette Benefits & Social Welfare Law Review has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marquette Benefits & Social Welfare Law Review. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:37, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed your comment. I understand what you mean and recognize the issue. There simply are no secondary, reliable sources that discuss the journal in a credible manner. The same goes for the Sports Law Review at Marquette which somehow has been approved for a Wikipedia page. If you don't believe that there is a purpose for an MBSWLR Wikipedia page then so be it, but my biggest reason for appealing the two denials has been the inconsistency between what is and what is not supposedly worthy for its own page. You might consider deleting the Sports Law page, and maybe even our flagship journals page. This may all seem trivial to you, so my apologies, but there has been recent conversation among alumni regarding the prestige/credibility of the journals and their presence on Wikipedia - adding the MBSWLR page was meant to prove a point that it doesn't make the journal any more or less prestigious. If this endeavor results in all the Marquette journal Wikipedia pages being taken down, then perhaps that is a good thing! Press4forapharmrep (talk) 20:16, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Marquette Benefits & Social Welfare Law Review

Hello, Press4forapharmrep. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marquette Benefits & Social Welfare Law Review, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Marquette Benefits & Social Welfare Law Review

Hello, Press4forapharmrep. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marquette Benefits & Social Welfare Law Review".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:38, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]