User talk:PremierePrush

This is PremierePrush's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PremierePrush (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here A lot of people work on our one IP, and some others helped. I did not encourage anything like this, and I can assure you that we are not connected in a way that would exemplify sockpuppeting. PremierePrush (talk) 22:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

From the technical evidence, it looks like sock puppetry not meat puppetry, however either way, you should remain blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 05:32, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, PremierePrush, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 23:58, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your user page

Hello! I noticed that you recently submitted an article for review at User:PremierePrush/sandbox/PremierPrush. However, the article appeared to be an attempt to create a user page for yourself and not an encyclopedic article. As such, I have moved the page to the correct location for your main user page at User:PremierePrush. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to leave me a message on my user talk page. Thanks, Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 23:59, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ram Ray—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ram L. Ray

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ram L. Ray you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KrishnaKant Bhai -- KrishnaKant Bhai (talk) 21:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ram L. Ray

The article Ram L. Ray you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ram L. Ray for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KrishnaKant Bhai -- KrishnaKant Bhai (talk) 21:41, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PremierePrush. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 22:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ram Ray (associate professor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ram Ray (associate professor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ram Ray (associate professor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]