User talk:Pravega/Archive 1

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, बृहस्पति, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Gopal Namkeen, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content protocols, and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are struck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you thru the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• How to write a great article
• The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Celestina007 (talk) 23:48, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gopal Namkeen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gopal Namkeen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Celestina007 (talk) 23:48, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:04, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

How I can retrive the data of that deleted pages?? बृहस्पति (talk) 04:53, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi बृहस्पति! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can I retrieve the data of my speedy deleted article?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi बृहस्पति! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can I submit my sandbox article for AfC?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi बृहस्पति! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Archiving Referances, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Military budget of India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NDA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kandla-Gorakhpur LPG Pipeline has been accepted

Kandla-Gorakhpur LPG Pipeline, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:18, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Pravega/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ~ Amkgp 💬 05:50, 1 July 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your thread has been archived

Hi बृहस्पति! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can I apply mainspace article for AfC?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Pravega! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Sending a WikiLove, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Pravega! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Request for suggestions/feedback., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to GSEG Combined Cycle Power plant, Hazira, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. 220 of ^ßorg 18:13, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patang Hotel (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Patang Hotel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Patang Hotel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 19:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Pravega! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chris Troutman (talk) 19:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Pravega! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to delete redirect from my sandbox?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atomberg Technologies (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CNMall41 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Atomberg Technologies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Atomberg Technologies, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: MYBYK (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MYBYK and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:MYBYK, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 10:21, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Pravega! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Concerned about Urdu Wikipedia articles' truthiness and neutrality, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

'''<i style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;"><font color="#AC9F06">❯❯❯</font>[[User:Pravega|<font color="#F93B12">Pra</font><font color="#098922">veg</font>]]<sup> [[User talk:Pravega|A=9.8]]</sup></i>''' : ❯❯❯Praveg ^A=9.8

to

'''<i style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;"><span style="color:#AC9F06">❯❯❯</span>[[User:Pravega|<span style="color:#F93B12">Pra</span><span style="color:#098922">veg</span>]]<sup> [[User talk:Pravega|A=9.8]]</sup></i>''' : ❯❯❯Praveg ^A=9.8

—Anomalocaris (talk) 06:04, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Done.--❯❯❯Praveg ^A=9.8 09:16, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! But I made a mistake. I forgot to escape the ampersand in  , both in your original and in my proposed new version, so it displayed as a space and that's how you copied it into your signature markup. That is OK, but if you want the nonbreaking space, change your signature to

'''<i style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;"><span style="color:#AC9F06">❯❯❯</span>[[User:Pravega|<span style="color:#F93B12">Pra</span><span style="color:#098922">veg</span>]]<sup>&nbsp;[[User talk:Pravega|A=9.8]]</sup></i>''' : ❯❯❯Praveg ^A=9.8

—Anomalocaris (talk) 07:00, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patang Hotel (October 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Patang Hotel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Patang Hotel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 16:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atomberg Technologies (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nightenbelle were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Atomberg Technologies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Atomberg Technologies, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 01:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: MYBYK has been accepted

MYBYK, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Paul ❬talk❭ 16:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Patang Hotel

Hello, Pravega. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Patang Hotel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Limited moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Limited, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 23:52, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Deepak Nitrite

The article Deepak Nitrite has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only stocks related news. Fails WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 11:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patang Hotel has been accepted

Patang Hotel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:54, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd.

Hello, Pravega. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:04, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Atomberg Technologies

Hello, Pravega. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Atomberg Technologies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

About your edit on Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War

Hello, there. About the citations you provided, where does it say Muslim women were the main victim? We all know that Hindus were the main target of Pakistan. However, both Muslim and Hindu, irrespective of their religions were assaulted by the Pakistani military. So I think it's better not to mention any specific religion. What do you think about it? MSouvik01 (talk) 12:52, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

One of your citations says,"Of the 19 women whose stories appear in this collection, 15 are Muslims, 2 are Hindus and 2 are Buddhists. Ms. Guhathakurta writes in her introduction to the book: “Out of the 19 interviewees, 9 were rape victims.”- These 9 women are just interviewed. What does it have anything to do with Muslim women being the most victim? Can 9 women represent the whole number of victims? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MSouvik01 (talk • contribs) 13:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Another citation you provided says, "There was also an attempt to wipe out the minorities from Bangladesh at the time of liberation war. In his eye-witness account Capt (Retd.) Syed Suzauddin Ahmed describes, on an instance, he heard "an army officer shouting, 'why you have killed Muslims. We ordered you to kill only Hindus." According to him, 'thus, I realised that they wanted to kill all Hindus of the country'

Though Bengali women were raped irrespective of their religious identity, Hindu women were mostly targeted." - Doesn't this mean Hindu women were the most victims?

So let's not add anything controversial. I have removed the sentence, but your citations are helpful. I hope you agree with me. Have a good day! MSouvik01 (talk)

@MSouvik01: I agree with you up to some extent that we should not mention any specific religion. If you read the previous versions of article you find that the article was well structured and neutral about religion. But then..Some editors tried to portray that majority rape victims were Hindus, which is not true and also not logical.(approx. 80% populations were Muslims at that time and you also agreed on that the pak army assaulted women irrespective of religion., so logically also 80% of them were Muslims.). A new section of [Hindu victims] was also added afterwards which disturbed balance. Please have a look at my previous edit. and also have a look at [1971 War Talk page]. The 3 out of 4 sources clearly tells that majority victims were Muslims. The forth mentions only about 19, so you may neglect that. If you removed my edit to neutralize the article about the religion then it is your moral responsibility to look at others sections of article too.❯❯❯Praveg ^A=9.8 13:33, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello my friend, I saw your previous edit. That was one editor's personal opinion, maybe even vandalism. You did a good job by removing it. You can always remove such sensitive sentences. Now about the majority, look, in a war all people are harmed irrespective of their religions or class. But Pakistan's intention was clearly to wipe out the minority Hindu people and to "purify" the Muslims. So a section mentioning their evil motive towards the Hindu people maybe not that bad. What do tou think?

Pakistani army used to search for Mukti Bahini and the Hindu people. So they are the main victims. But in fact, pakistani army and rajakars also killed and r**ed many Muslims. 80% people were Muslim but the ratio Pakistan assaulted Muslims weren't 80%. Because they had a main target- The Hindu. So the ratio Muslims assaulted will not be 80% at all, maybe 50-50. And also, you can't just believe any books written on wars and casualties. They are all biased toward one or another, you know. MSouvik01 (talk) 14:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Also, Pakistani religious (?) leaders created a ridiculous fatwa that claimed Mukti bahini are Hindu. But you know, most of the muktijoddha are Muslims, they are fighting for their country. So the fatwa of Pakistan saying bengalis are hindu and their women are "war booty" is against Islam. So they are just radicalist and extremists; they are not true Muslims. Their target was mainly our hindu brothers and sisters, but they massacred Both muslims and hindus. So, majority rape victims weren't Muslims nor Hindus, it was 50-50. I think 80% logic is not working here. What do you think? MSouvik01 (talk) 14:39, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Dear MSouvik01, I will research on this topic, some deep digging required. And I will add appropriate sentence backed with the solid citations.

You asked for my opinion, here it is:

Pakistan's religious leaders openly supported the crime by labelling Bengali freedom fighters as "Hindus", Which means performing atrocities against Hindus was not crime as per their mindset. And I don't think their mindset is changed yet. That's why some editors are trying to portray that most of the victims of atrocities were Hindu and trying to justify the actions of Pak army. So the actual figures/percentage is required for the articles to summaries barbarism of Pak army.❯❯❯Praveg ^A=9.8 11:42, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Well, pakistan really has that type of mindset and they did all these claiming bengali people hindu even though they were muslim, isn't it? And performing atrocities against any religion, let alone hindu, is war crime, that can never justify their atrocities.

If any editor adds something controversial or personal opinion to justify pakistan or claiming hindu or muslim the major victims, you can remove that. So let's not add any controversial percentage. Is the current lead section somewhat ok? MSouvik01 (talk) 13:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

@Pravega please do not misinterpret sources. You are adding original research to all these articles. I have explained here, this is considered a genocidal rape because the perpetrators specifically targeted the Hindus with an intention to destroy their existence. The perpetrators also included Bengali Muslims so if you say Muslims were also targeted, you are denying the genocidal claims, for which there is a clear academic consensus. Please try to understand. A.Musketeer (talk) 11:27, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

This user named "A.Musketeer" is constantly vandalizing the page and showing the hindu as the only victims. And He just copy-pasted the same text that already exists under "Hindu victims" section. I just reorganized the lead and edited but that user reverted it back. What should be done? MSouvik01 (talk) 18:00, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Dear MSouvik01, If someone is doing vandalism consistently then you may report the user or post warning message on his/her talk page. If you have any further doubts, You can go to Wikipedia:Teahouse and ask your doubt if needed.❯❯❯Praveg ^A=9.8 11:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jeppiz (talk) 14:38, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

For your awareness

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

hemantha (brief) 10:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: BoAt (February 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by RPSkokie were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

RPSkokie (talk) 10:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

@RPSkokie: I definitely think the article is notable as per WP:ORG. Can you please mention any specific criteria which draft lacks. Because I already included enough secondary and reliable sources which are independent. Previous editor of the draft may added some advertisement like sentences but I already removed such content to meet Wikipedia guideline.❯❯❯Pravega ^g=9.8 10:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:ROUTINE, routine news coverage as announcements are not sufficient basis for an article. RPSkokie (talk) 03:25, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

@RPSkokie: I included more references which have significant coverage of the company other than WP:ROUTINE, Please have a look at it.❯❯❯Pravega ^g=9.8 04:42, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd.

Hello, Pravega. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:10, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Hi Pravega! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Kashmir Files that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Hemantha (talk) 08:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Unacademy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Unacademy. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 14:45, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unacademy (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Unacademy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Unacademy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:50, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Pravega! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, New article reviewed but not appearing on the Google search, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Boat Electronics

Hello, Pravega. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Boat Electronics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:39, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Boat Electronics

Hello, Pravega. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Boat Electronics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)