User talk:Praveen Ahuja Chandigarh

Welcome!

Hello, Praveen Ahuja Chandigarh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 18:33, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I've created an article page for an author. It's titled "Jenny Bhatt". How do I submit this for review and approval to make it go live? Sorry, this is my first page ever on Wikipedia. Thank you so much for your help. Praveen Ahuja Chandigarh (talk) 05:17, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Praveen Ahuja Chandigarh, I have moved the page to Draft:Jenny Bhatt, which is its proper place. I have also submitted it for review on your behalf. It will now enter the articles for creation queue, to get reviewed by one of our volunteers. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:46, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jenny Bhatt (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jenny Bhatt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jenny Bhatt, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:57, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Praveen Ahuja Chandigarh! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:57, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jenny Bhatt (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jenny Bhatt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jenny Bhatt, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 12:46, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jenny Bhatt has been accepted

Jenny Bhatt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MapleSoy (talk) 17:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kimmins High School, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 03:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hi Praveen Ahuja Chandigarh! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 18:12, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Praveen Ahuja Chandigarh. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Desi Books, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2A01:4C8:A8:CC79:DAB:5CBD:E007:C1E4 (talk) 15:40, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Desi Books

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Desi Books, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A01:4C8:A8:CC79:149F:B2ED:1B36:153F (talk) 16:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Praveen Ahuja Chandigarh. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Jenny Bhatt, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 00:29, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Jenny Bhatt for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Praveen Ahuja Chandigarh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I understand the block and will not be editing this page again. Please would you unblock me and I will sign out completely from this page entirely. Thank you. Praveen Ahuja Chandigarh (talk) 18:27, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No need to lift the block as you don't plan to edit that page. Yamla (talk) 18:30, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Praveen Ahuja Chandigarh (talk) 18:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC)But will the block message continue to be visible to the rest of the world? You can leave the block on my account but please remove the message on the page? Thanks.Praveen Ahuja Chandigarh (talk) 18:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The rules are that you can go ahead and remove the block notice -- but you cannot remove the declined unblock request. The existence of the block is entirely public; the community is entitled to know that you are not allowed to edit that article. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:42, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Praveen Ahuja Chandigarh (talk) 19:49, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Thank you for the clarification. Still new to this thing.Praveen Ahuja Chandigarh (talk) 19:49, 5 October 2021 (UTC) Praveen Ahuja Chandigarh (talk) 19:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)I am unable to delete the page entirely. Please would someone help with that? Just delete the page entirely so that I can be done with Wikipedia and delete my account also? Thank you.Praveen Ahuja Chandigarh (talk) 19:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, you can't delete your talk page and you can't delete your account. But, it is easy to be done with Wikipedia, just stop editing! --RegentsPark (comment) 20:08, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Praveen Ahuja Chandigarh (talk) 20:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC)I'm not asking about deleting my talk page. I'm asking about how to delete a page I created and have now been blocked from editing. I created a page and I've been blocked from editing it. I would like to delete that page entirely. How can that be done, please?Praveen Ahuja Chandigarh (talk) 20:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which page do you mean? Jenny Bhatt or something else? Mostly, you can't delete pages either without community consensus (see WP:AFD for the process of initiating a delete request - since you're not site blocked, you can do that yourself). See also the terms of use you've agreed to when editing wikipedia--RegentsPark (comment) 21:00, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]