User talk:Prairie7

Welcome!

Hi Prairie7! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --Doncram (talk) 17:18, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Have a great day! Prairie7 (talk) 18:04, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again... further congratulations on owning/restoring color scheme of, etc. a genuine historic property. If you haven't seen, please do see my comments at Draft talk:Cassidy House (Rapid City, South Dakota), where I request to my friend, I think i can say, and editor User:Bkissin that your article be promoted back to mainspace. It is definitely a valid Wikipedia topic and can have an article, and IMHO your version is good enough, esp. with my having corroborated your sourcing from the NRHP document. I would prefer to make improvements to the article after it is returned to mainspace, for various reasons, but you should know that whether or not Bkissin agrees and moves the article, it will get to restored to mainspace. If Bkissin does not agree to my request, then eventually I would revisit the draft article, anyhow, and make improvements that bring it into more clear full compliance with Wikipedia requirements, and it would then get promoted. So be patient, don't be discouraged, feel free to make further edits to this and/or other articles.

By the way, you maybe are lucky that, in your first editing in Wikipedia, you have chosen to work on a NRHP-listed place as your topic. Because that is basically guaranteed to be accepted, while probably most new editors contributing a new article will get frustrated by their topic getting refused. Perhaps in an unpleasant kind of legal-like process called "Articles for Deletion" (you can see examples of such processes going on at wp:AFD). It is generally hard to get started in Wikipedia, it can be very unfriendly to new editors not knowing the ropes and about many explicit policies or unwritten practices here, and some editors being very unfriendly (which you have not experienced). I surmise that you could possibly be interested only in getting this one article done and accepted, but I hope you might be interested in participating further, perhaps in contributing photos and writing about other historic properties in your area or elsewhere. I have much enjoyed working mainly on articles about NRHP-listed places all over the U.S. And there is a "WikiProject" group focussed on this, at shortcut wp:NRHP and you are welcome to join that, and either way to make comments or ask questions at its Talk page, shortcut wt:NRHP. Again, hang in there, and keep up your good work! cheers, --Doncram (talk) 03:55, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the encouragement! Actually, I had written edits to an article on Badger Clark (poet laureate of South Dakota). One of my main sources for some of the interesting bits about him was from a historical recording of him discussing some of his history (and reading some of his poems). There are no transcriptions online of what he says, so it is difficult to source as it cannot be easily verified without spending $20 on the historical CD (which I did).

I had fully intended to make more edits to the Cassidy House listing as I was tired while writing it and there are more pieces of information that might be valuable.

Again, I appreciate the encouragement! I used to write columns for the my local newspaper. As with everything, it's a matter of finding the time and having the passion.

Have a fantastic day or evening...whatever time zone you are in! Prairie7 (talk) 05:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cassidy House (Rapid City, South Dakota) (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 97198 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cassidy House (Rapid City, South Dakota) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

97198 (talk) 20:32, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arnold H. Glasow (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

sources do not appear to be reliable?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arnold H. Glasow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Prairie7! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Arnold H. Glasow

Hello, Prairie7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arnold H. Glasow, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]