User talk:PrabhGill1jatt

September 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Jalandhar. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Biker Biker (talk) 09:01, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a directory, and list articles are primarily meant to be navigational aids not a white pages of every Tom, Dick and Harry. --Biker Biker (talk) 09:06, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please do not revert edits on Jalandhar. The additions do not meet the Wikipedia guidelines. More details are on the article talk page. WP is not a directory. Continuing to revert without discussion on the talk page may lead to a block, as mentioned. Span (talk) 22:00, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The text at Jalandhar was removed for a reason. If you wish to discuss the changes or you have a problem with them, please join the discussion on the article talk page. Wikipedia is a collective, collaborative project that depends on guidelines and discussion, no one person's idea of what should be included. If you keep re-adding it, this will be taken as disruptive editing and you will be blocked. Span (talk) 21:23, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PrabhGill1jatt, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi PrabhGill1jatt! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 00:25, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ramgarhia without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 11:40, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Ramgarhia. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 11:43, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Caste sanctions

With regard to your recent edits at Ramgarhia, please note the warning below. - Sitush (talk) 11:46, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions.

Your recent editing history at Ramgarhia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sitush (talk) 11:48, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Alexf^(talk) 18:23, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Jalandhar has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 10:08, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. – Connormah (talk) 19:32, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]