User talk:Potugin

February 2021

Hello, I'm Ahmetlii. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2021 Russian protests, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ahmetlii (talk) 15:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will add a source from the KPRF website.Potugin (talk) 15:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Potugin, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahmetlii (talk) 15:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Comment

Not that I am opposed to your edits, but that would be a much better source on the subject. My very best wishes (talk) 19:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, feel free to add it to the article. I'm a frequent reader of Illaryonov's blog, not that I'd agree with everything he writes. Potugin (talk) 20:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think he just discredited himself (unfortunately, many Russians in US believe the same). I prefer interviews by Dmitry Gordon with different people he invites. My very best wishes (talk) 22:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there's no point in condemning someone completely just because he has expressed controversial views on some issue or you don't agree with him at all in something. E.g. Illaryonov also has non-mainstream views as to anthropogenic climate warming. And Navalny had his nationalist past.Potugin (talk) 12:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a fan of Navalny, but for a different reason. He was not telling whole truth like Politkovskaya, Litvinenko or even Rybkin (meaning the events in 1999). But this is easy to judge from here. If he did, we know what it means. But that does not matter for him now. My very best wishes (talk) 14:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Parizhskiy vestnik moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Parizhskiy vestnik, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Roller26 (talk) 21:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit

This is unacceptable for several reasons. First, you accuse me of "pushing" some ideas. Accusation of misbehaviour is a personal attack, and if such a statement is placed to an edit summary, you cannot withdraw it. In future, please, be more cautious with edit summaries. Second, as I already explained in my edit summary, infoboxes are just article's summaries, and the article tells nothing about Marxism-Leninism as a "motive". Therefore, my edit is in agreement with our guidelines, whereas yours is not. Third, you write about "Maoism", whereas the statement added by you tells about a much broader category, Marxism-Leninism. Therefore, your edit is inconsistent with your rationale. I suggest you to self-revert and join a talk page discussion instead.--Paul Siebert (talk) 00:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nationalist Liberal Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent Liberal Party. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

GizzyCatBella🍁 20:11, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks for notifying me, but most of the (political) topics I'm interested in seem to be under some "general discretionary sanctions" and I'm already aware of the necessity of being cautious. What about the "500/30 rule and Poland" tho? I would need to dig in some more Wikihistory I guess.Potugin (talk) 20:14, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] - GizzyCatBella🍁 20:26, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks! So, thus far it seems I have actually not violated this rule (or rather: ruling?), and I will keep away from 1939-145 topics until I'm eligible at one point in the future.Potugin (talk) 20:29, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Uyghur genocide. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:30, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me, but I won't touch the article itself anyway. Even my energy has limits :) Potugin (talk) 04:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 22:23, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lotus: Afro-Asian Writings moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lotus: Afro-Asian Writings, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Parizhskiy vestnik

Hello, Potugin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Parizhskiy vestnik, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lotus: Afro-Asian Writings

Hello, Potugin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lotus: Afro-Asian Writings, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lotus: Afro-Asian Writings

Hello, Potugin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lotus: Afro-Asian Writings".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:47, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Parizhskiy vestnik

Hello, Potugin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Parizhskiy vestnik".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:02, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]