User talk:Positivetruthintent

Zimmermanism

To begin with, it is irrelevant to site Wiki “Articles for deletion/Gregory Zimmerman;” this previous post is not equally linked or represented under the new title, “Zimmermanism.” Additionally, “Wiki/Zimmermanism” is a revised iteration of that which was previously and topically thought by some on the “articles for deletion” page to perhaps, maintain notability; although, seemingly, biased individuals, which are apparently unaware of how a “constitutional injustice” and/or a foregoing violation of constitutional rights, are a direct and immediate threat to all US Citizens.

Furthermore, this post does not advertise Zimmerman’s services, as Zimmerman has no services (based on the information at the referenced organizations); organization names and their applicability is important, as it aids in the defining of Zimmerman’s court case, Zimmerman, and illustrates a broader view of an evermore important topic.

Subjectively and topically, the state or quality of “a matter” being noteworthy is not “perceptually specific” to the noteworthy forum; although value or rank of notability may be. Moreover, a noteworthy matter positively increases the relevance and notability of specifically referenced individuals; especially when their definition, or lack of such information, greatly impacts the comprehensibility of such matters due to esoteric knowledge.

In response to “Neologism”: Although, by definition, this label may apply since Zimmermanism itself falls in categories such as, New Age, Buddhism (which adjusts to newly found Truth), Philosophy, New Thought Movement, and New Thought Writers; however, in which “sense of the word,” do you feel your “movement for removal” is aided by its use?

I move to “KEEP” this article on Wiki and strike any further ignorant and opinionated opposition for removal. Positivetruthintent (talk) 21:23, 25 August 2008 (UTC)