User talk:PortugalPepe

Welcome!

Hello, PortugalPepe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 20:08, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Concession stand may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

are often contracted out to third parties. Legends Hospitality Management LLC (which services [[Yankee Stadium)) and [[Delaware North]] are companies that specialize in stadium catering. Alternatively,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:08, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra Bussin

I asked you once to discuss the reasons for your restoration of the old text on the Sandra Bussin on the associated talk page. Please do so before reverting again. Thankyou. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 21:50, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sandra Bussin, you may be blocked from editing. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 20:28, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sandra Bussin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

511550--heaps-no-longer-wants-money-for-lawsuit-expenses|title=declined $65,000 in city money]}}</ref> for a similar libel suit.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:17, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra Bussin

Once there's been enough discussion to properly establish a consensus one way or the other on the suitability of the material. Bearcat (talk) 18:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Sandra Bussin (Canadian politician)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Sandra Bussin (Canadian politician). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Sandra Bussin. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Sandra Bussin – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 17:52, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, please be aware that no matter how you feel about the current dispute at the existing article, posting your preferred version as a new second article about the same person at another title is not on your list of options. Trust me, I'm as annoyed by the difficulty in getting enough participation in the discussion to establish a clear consensus one way or the other as you are — but like it or not, you have to allow the process to conclude according to Wikipedia's policies and practices, and having two competing versions of the same article coexisting at two different titles is not part of those processes. Bearcat (talk) 20:30, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restored edit on Airbus A350

I restored your edit on the A350 page [1], however both Wolbo and McSly are actively engaged in a highly disruptive ownership edit warring game, while refusing to engage editors on the talk page.Judithar1 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:39, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 18:12, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note about this block

In connection to JacksonRiley's unblock request, considering it was because the user was caught in a block intended to prevent a sock puppeteer, I ran a checkuser. From this, I found some odd editing, shown below.

Selected editing history from Airbus_A350_XWB - note how PortugalPepe appears from nowhere to support JacksonRiley

Considering that JacksonRiley is Technically indistinguishable from PortugalPepe, I've blocked both accounts indefinitely. PhilKnight (talk) 18:14, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]