User talk:Porqaz

Welcome!

Hello, Porqaz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Scaphiophis, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Zzaffuto118 (talk) 22:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Scaphiophis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Scaphiophis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Zzaffuto118 (talk) 22:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

...for your contribution to the article Suidae!Chrisrus (talk) 02:22, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Physeterula

The speedy deletion criteria (no source) used in Physeterula was not in the list, so I presume that it was invalid. I restored the content, but it would be helpful if you could add a reference. See wp:rs and wp:citing sources. Articles on species are generally notable, so there should not be an issue with that. If you need help, please let me know on my talk page as I am not monitoring yours. You can leave a comment here so that the discussion stays on one page and put a {{tb|User talk:Porqaz}} on my page. Sorry for the problems and thanks for yoru contributions. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:25, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Paradolichopithecus) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Paradolichopithecus, Porqaz!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've added a category, tags on the talk page and linked to an article in Ukranian on the genus.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 08:36, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chazer listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chazer. Since you had some involvement with the Chazer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Porqaz

Thank you for creating Findley's woodrat.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work on this article, I made some adjustments as some of the wording was flagged for copyright violation. Could you please check my edits and also please be careful to write text in you own word. Regards

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

@Hughesdarren: No worries. Thank you for fixing up the page.Porqaz (talk) 02:05, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 02:00, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Praeovibos

Hi. Please could you explain why you undid my edit at Praeovibos. Your edit caused an error to appear here by including the manual field 'binomial'. As the genus is monotypic, it is fine to use a speciesbox. YorkshireExpat (talk) 19:41, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@YorkshireExpat: Hi, I thaught by changing to speciesbox the binomial name was removed. I see it was a mistake. Feel free to undo my revert. Porqaz (talk) 20:19, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Your edit to Cubanycteris has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Sennecaster (What now?) 06:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aepyceros, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page African. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nexuotapirus

Hello! I just wanted to ask you why have you blanked the article about Nexuotapirus. I am not a paleontology pro so I don't understand all of the details, however the genus looks real and there are refs to prove that. Maybe we could create at least a stub? Tell me what do you think. Best, Less Unless (talk) 11:07, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Less Unless: Hi, I was actually going to request a deletion but I had an article already planned, so I decided not to request it. I blanked the redirect yesterday, but never got around to posting my article and forgot about my redirect deletion. I posted the new article today anyways. Thanks for the reminder.Porqaz (talk) 14:29, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pekania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fisher.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zenkerella (rodent), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Songhor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, I'm Robertjamal12. I noticed that you recently removed content from Black vulture without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Robertjamal12 (talk) 23:27, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Taxonomy/†Kritimys

Template:Taxonomy/†Kritimys has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:42, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]