User talk:Poorarticleremovalist

This account is a suspected sockpuppet of 767-249ER (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. . Adam (talk) 06:33, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rozelle, New South Wales, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. . Adam (talk) 06:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Most articles should be improved rather than deleted, but if you think the encyclopedia would be better without an article you should follow one of the procedures explained in the Deletion Policy. Just unilaterally blanking articles is vandalism; you will be reverted, and if you continue you will be blocked from editing. JohnCD (talk) 08:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User:Loy Wong. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. . Adam (talk) 10:32, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user is trying to discredit me

This user is trying to discredit me PoorPhotoremovalist (talk) 06:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have just logged in after a couple of days away from my computer and have noticed this account going around to all articles that I have edited and doing stupid things. I would like to state that this user is not linked to me. I think this account belongs to another editor with another account that started this account to try and have me blocked or somethingPoorPhotoremovalist (talk) 06:18, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at my contributions you will notice that I have tried to format articles and do the right thing but this account is going around and deleting loads of content from articles PoorPhotoremovalist (talk) 06:20, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because its username is a blatant violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, attacks or impersonates another person, or clearly suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior will not be tolerated. If you feel this block has been made in error, you may appeal it by placing the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.

Theresa Knott | token threats 08:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the sock puppet tag has the wrong account in it. It should be user Loy wong unless they are all linked . Adam (talk) 02:10, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]