User talk:Pookah0501

Welcome!

Hello, Pookah0501, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorials
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 00:45, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adding external links in text is contrary to WP:MOS - and as it reads in current edits looks like advertising as well...

Please take time to read about SPAM and why some of your edits might be considered spam. JarrahTree 00:48, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pookah0501, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Pookah0501! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

February 2024

Hello Pookah0501. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Pookah0501. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Pookah0501|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 02:57, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elisabeth Kübler-Ross, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bantam, Scribner and Fireside. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - I'm still learning...

Ken Ross (photographer)

Hi. Regarding your edits to Ken Ross (photographer), do you have a conflict of interest with this article - are you Ross, or do you know, represent or work for him? Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 21:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you find some material objectionable or false? Please let me know. Happy to discuss. Excogitate32 (talk) 00:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, are you using two accounts? Tacyarg (talk) 07:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ken Ross (photographer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ken Ross (photographer), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Ross (photographer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]