User talk:Poohsparta

Welcome!

Hello, Poohsparta, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 10:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shinagawa Station may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Shin-Kawasaki}}, {{ja-stalink|Yokohama}}, {{ja-stalink|Ōfuna}}}}, and {{ja-stalink|Kurihama}}}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for opinion on E233 series article images

Hi. I note that you have edited the E233 series article recently, but I wonder if you can have a look at the article's Talk page, as I have posted a comment there about the choice of images recently added to the article by editor (銚電神). In case you weren't aware, one of the images replaced (File:E233kei 5000bandai.JPG) was actually approved recently as a "Quality Image" on Commons, so I don't think this should be replaced by anything inferior. Talk:E257 series is another case where the same thing has occurred, as well as at Azusa (train). I've already reverted him once, but he simply reverts again without comment, apparently just determined to re-add his own photos at all cost, so maybe you can have a look, and comment on whether you feel the best images are currently being used in these articles. Thanks for your time. --DAJF (talk) 23:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Tokyo Station. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 04:38, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please could you be courteous and include an edit summary with your edits, as it's hard to determine whether you are genuinely trying to be helpful or intentionally adding incorrect details to articles. --DAJF (talk) 05:00, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kawasaki Station may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{ja-rail-line|pfn=1|first=2|name=Tōkaidō Main Line|linecol=orange|dir=for {{ja-stalink|Yokohama}}, {

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:18, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Toride Station does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! DAJF (talk) 00:51, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Kawagoe Station, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 05:12, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tokyo Metro service colour coding

Thanks for your interest in improving the Shibuya Station article. However, as I have noted (twice now) in my edit summaries, Tokyo Metro does not actually use any colour coding for all-stations ("Local") services. Please be careful, and check official sources before adding details like that in future rather than simply guessing. Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 13:16, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shōnan-Shinjuku Line and Narita Express edits

Hi again. Re your recent edits to the Shōnan-Shinjuku Line and Narita Express articles, please read the introductory paragraph of the Shōnan-Shinjuku Line article. The article does actually state that it is really a "service", and has no dedicated track. Hopefully that should clarify any confusion you may have had. --DAJF (talk) 12:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Yokohama Station. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 08:03, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please, please, please be more careful about adding incorrect details to articles without sources, such as in your recent edit to the Ueno Station article here. I've noticed that a large proportion of your edits add erroneous details to articles. Please take just a few seconds to check official details such as timetable or even the corresponding Japanese Wikipedia article. I'm assuming your edits are well-intentioned, but without an edit summary, it is not always clear. If, as it appears, English is not your native language, have you considered concentrating on the Wikipedia project in your own language, as you may be able to contribute more effectively there? Once again, please be more careful about adding unsourced and inaccurate details to articles. --DAJF (talk) 03:04, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Uchibō Line, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 05:39, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Narita Express. DAJF (talk) 07:38, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to E231 series ‎. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DAJF (talk) 13:18, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Poohsparta. You have new messages at DAJF's talk page.
Message added 10:41, 13 September 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

DAJF (talk) 10:41, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]