User talk:Polokutty

Zulfi Syed

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Zulfi Syed, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jeetegakaun.in/celebrities/zulfi_syed. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:05, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Zulfi Syed

A tag has been placed on Zulfi Syed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:06, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PAK FA and FGFA

hi as i have noticed on the PAK FA article that the indian version of the aircraft is not being explained well, i started an article in FGFA. have a look and perhaps you may have more informations to expand the article. some links, maybe you havent see them yet:

http://livefist.blogspot.com/2008/10/photos-ins-vikramaditya-like-youve.html

http://livefist.blogspot.com/2008/09/hals-baweja-two-different-prototypes-of.html

(Samar60 (talk) 21:06, 25 October 2008 (UTC)).[reply]

Bollywood

Please stop adding information that is not correct and removing sourced info from the Bollywood article. Dhoom 2, Veer-Zaara, Koi Mil Gaya and Kal Ho Naa Ho are top grossing films. Lage Raho Munnabhai is not. Kabhi Khushi Gham is not. And none of the big grossers stars Kareena, except for Kabhi Khushi Kabhi Gham in which she had a small and insignificant role compared to her roles in other films and compared to the other actors in the film. And stop removing Preity Zinta from the list. Aish, Rani and Preity are the two most popular actresses of the 2000s so far in terms of both critical and commercial success. As for Kareena, two of her films last year flopped badly. So her success is inconsistent. And her role in the only hit she starred in was not that well received. Let's see if this year brings more commercial successes from her. And then we'll add her. I'm fond of her progress but I want to see an evidence. For every other thing, please cite sources. And please do not even dare comparing an average actor like John Abraham to Avhishek Bachchan, let alone Hrithik. Shahid • ^Talk2me 14:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The next time you revert the article - you will be BLOCKED from editing. Shahid • ^Talk2me 14:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sock puppetry. If you wish to appeal your block, please do so under your primary account.. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:55, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shimla Public School

The article Shimla Public School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NSCHOOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:00, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]