Jump to content

User talk:PokestarFan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unblock of 2017 #1

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PokestarFan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I will be more contributing. I want to fight vandalisim, which seems to be everywhere nowadays. Also have around 75K edits from Wikidata.

Decline reason:

Looking at your contributions, it seems that the vast majority of them have been to your user or user talk pages, and only 12 have been in article space [1], and most of them weren't particularly useful. Indeed, since posting this unblock request, you have continued refactoring this talk page [2]. Other than a vague promise to "fight vandalism" (without giving any indication that you understand what vandalism is), and no suggestion that you intend to build the encyclopedia, I see no reason to unblock you at this time. Optimist on the run (talk) 13:21, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Could you start by detailing exactly why you were blocked, and how you propose to rectify the behaviour that led to this? Optimist on the run (talk) 19:31, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Optimist on the run: I got blocked for using Wikipedia as a social site, and now I will contribute on articles. PokestarFan (talk) 20:09, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I reviewed some of those Wikidata edits. I assume you are aware that you introduced a dozen or so errors each to all of your most heavily edited items? I'm not impressed by such a "quantity over quality" approach. Huon (talk) 19:49, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Huon: What? I am not aware of that. Can you please link some examples? PokestarFan (talk) 20:09, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You added labels to year articles for various languages that don't use Latin characters, say literary Chinese. I'm pretty sure that the label of, say, 2221 in Chinese is not "2221" but... something in Chinese characters. Huon (talk) 20:32, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Huon:Numbers in Chinese do not have translations[1]. For example, 2221 is 2221 in Chinese, but year 2221 is 2221年. If you want characters, I will change the Chinese translation to say 2221年. PokestarFan (talk) 21:42, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ "Google Translate". translate.google.com. Retrieved 2017-03-11.

I'll move the off-topic discussion to your Wikidata talk page. Huon (talk) 22:08, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Summary #252

[edit]

22:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

14:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

New Start

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PokestarFan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I know that it will always look like I am editing my talk page, so I want to have a fresh start. Can I have a fresh start? I will allow the alternative account to betracked, and will not make any edits that shows that I am trying to decorate my user space. Can I please have a fresh start? PokestarFan (talk) 22:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'l cite WP:Fresh start: Any user who has active bans, blocks or sanctions [...] may not have a clean start. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:45, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How can I get myself unblocked?

[edit]

How can I get myself unblocked? I have tried The Standard Offer, and it did not work. I want to show that I really want to edit, but there is nothing I can do. Can I do anything, or is it indef block for life? PokestarFan (talk) 23:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One option open to you would be for you to copy (with attribution) a small article from the main encyclopedia onto your talk page, and for you to work on it over the next few days and weeks, demonstrating your ability to edit, reference, generate citations, work with wiki markup etc. When you finish working on an article, you can request another unblock, this time you'll have generated a body of evidence which an administrator can take into consideration and to then decide on unblocking your account. We're all here to write an encyclopedia, that's where you've had trouble in the past, so focus on that going forward. Nick (talk) 09:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Archive

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PokestarFan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Could someone decline this, but copy/paste all threads to new archive Archive 6? PokestarFan (talk) 12:03, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. Unblock requests are only to be used to request an unblock. Yamla (talk) 13:32, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The Comedians in Africa is a 1967 film[1] released by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer[2] to augment its feature film The Comedians.

Synopsis

[edit]

This short documentary[3] chronicles the difficulties encountered by the crew and cast while filming The Comedians on location in Africa's Dahomey (since renamed the Republic of Benin).[4] Author Graham Greene and director Peter Glenville appear in the film, as do actors Richard Burton, Elizabeth Taylor, Alec Guinness, Peter Ustinov, Georg Stanford Brown, Roscoe Lee Browne, Paul Ford, Lillian Gish, James Earl Jones and Raymond St. Jacques.[5]

Ratings

[edit]

Filmweb gave the movie a rating of 8 out of 10.[3] IMDb gave it a rating of 6.7 out of 10.[4] Rateyourmusic called it the #838 movie in 1967.[6]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "The Comedians in Africa (Film, Movie Documentary): Reviews, Ratings, Cast and Crew - Rate Your Music". rateyourmusic.com. Retrieved 2017-04-02.
  2. ^ "The Comedians in Africa (1967) - Overview - TCM.com". Turner Classic Movies. Retrieved 2017-04-02.
  3. ^ a b "The Comedians in Africa (1967) - Filmweb". FilmWeb (in Polish). Archived from the original on 2 April 2017. Retrieved 2 April 2017. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  4. ^ a b garykmcd. "The Comedians in Africa (1967) - Plot Summary IMDb". IMDb. Archived from the original on 2 April 2017. Retrieved 2 April 2017. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  5. ^ "The Comedians in Africa (1967) - Full Cast & Crew - IMDb". Archived from the original on 2 April 2017. Retrieved 2 April 2017. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  6. ^ "The Comedians in Africa (Film, Movie Documentary): Reviews, Ratings, Cast and Crew - Rate Your Music". rateyourmusic.com. Retrieved 2017-04-02.

Contribution

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PokestarFan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am perfectly capable of contributing good content. Can I please contribute like this?

Decline reason:

Until you stop socking, no. No you cannot. You could take the standard offer in walking away from Wikipedia completely for 6-12 months, no edits, no socking, nothing. Give that amount of time, your unblock request may be given more of a chance. Right now however, as you continue to sock that won't happen. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Recently, you socked as GoodOne2017. If I would be an admin here, I will speedy decline this request. Come on PokestarFan, take a break from editing. That's only your chance to continue editing here. Pokéfan95 (talk) 10:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

17:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

18:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: March 2017

[edit]




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

19:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

16:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

19:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

02:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Learning Quarterly: May 2017

[edit]

L&E Newsletter / Volume 4 / Issue 12 / May 2017
Learning Quarterly

Frontpage:
#LearningDays
#CCD

Stay tuned
blogs, events
& more!

Leave your mark on Meta!
Inspiring ideas and learning patterns you can contribute to.

Editing News #1—2017

[edit]

17:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

UTRS 29507

[edit]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

PokestarFan (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #29507 was submitted on 2020-03-17 21:14:06. This review is now closed.


--Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 00:58, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PokestarFan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like to start re-contributing to the wiki. I have waited over a year and a half between my last appeal. PokestarFan (talk) 21:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address any of the concerns that lead to your block. WP:GAB explains how to write an unblock request. Yamla (talk) 21:51, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: Would applying the Standard Offer be a good way to make a convincing case for unblock? PokestarFan (talk) 22:36, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock #2

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PokestarFan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Good evening. I have taken the time necessary to figure out what I had done to lead to the block and what I should do moving forward in order to contribute positively to this wiki.

  1. I realize that I thought Wikipedia was a fun way to make my own page, since I originally did not have any experience in HTML, CSS, or even making my own webpage. Now that I have grown up from that point in life, and figured out how to do that on a platform which is truly designed for that type of content. Additionally, I will try my best to declutter my userspace and clean up the bloat that I created.
  2. I realize that I would make vague unblock requests which basically centered around the fact that I had waited a period of time that I thought was sufficient for a re-examination of the block (usually 6 months to a year). I have decided to come back to Wikipedia now, when I intend to put my best and only my best into editing.
  3. I realize that making alternate accounts to get past my editing ban, even to make harmless and/or beneficial edits, is wrong and dishonest, and that I should have waited to contribute to Wikipedia as a whole and not about a certain topic. I will no longer think about creating sockpuppet accounts, and I am proud to say that I have gone sockpuppet-free since the last sockpuppet incident.
  4. I want to use both the Standard Offer and the Second Chance.

PokestarFan (talk) 01:52, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Despite saying that you wouldn't try to evade your block, you've done so. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:54, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PokestarFan (talk) 01:52, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please get a status update on my unblock request? PokestarFan (talk) 01:41, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: How have I evaded my block? PokestarFan (talk) 17:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've edited as an IP. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@NinjaRobotPirate: I do not remember editing as an IP. Are you sure that it was me? PokestarFan (talk) 23:38, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@NinjaRobotPirate could you please provide proof that I was editing as an IP? The only thing that comes to mind is a few harmless edits I made as an IP because I had forgotten that I was permanently blocked on this account. I also have not committed any vandalism ever as an IP after the last period. PokestarFan (talk) 23:58, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PokestarFan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My previous unblock request was denied due to accusations of sockpuppetry, yet I do not recall intentionally socking on Wikipedia. I have asked for evidence yet have never received any evidence. I would like to be unblocked based on my knowledge and intentions of my actions. If there is any evidence showing that I have intentionally socked on Wikipedia, I would like to be able to see it.

Decline reason:

You don't recall "intentionally socking"? Combined with the admission in your previous unblock that at one point you forgot you were blocked and edited from an IP, I have no confidence you won't be tempted to do this again, and since we have given you three chances since we restored your talk page access, as polite as you have been about it I think we have no choice now but revoke it again so you can appeal through UTRS. -Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PokestarFan (talk) 13:38, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 02:09, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]