User talk:Poindextero

Welcome!

Hello, Poindextero, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 02:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Gisèle Lagacé au Comiccon de Montréal 2019.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gisèle Lagacé au Comiccon de Montréal 2019.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:50, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gisèle Lagacé au Comiccon de Montréal 2019.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gisèle Lagacé au Comiccon de Montréal 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harley Quinn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joker. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reddit

Reddit is a self published source. Per WP:USINGSPS, specifically the section "Identifying self-published sources", "Identifying a self-published source is usually straightforward. You need two pieces of information: 1: Who is the author or creator of the work? 2: Who is the publisher of the work? If the answers to these questions are the same, then the work is self-published." The author is the director, the publisher is the director, meaning it qualifies as self-published. Additionally, Reddit falls under user generated content which isn't an acceptable source per WP:UGC. That policy specifically even names Reddit. So because of those policies, Reddit should not be used as a source. So please leave those statements out of the article.--Rockchalk7 17 19:18, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rockchalk717: ...You do understand that those are literally the directors of Scream (2022)? Along with the rest of Radio Silence? Regardless of whether you deem it an acceptable source, they are the ones speaking; if this Q&A had been hosted on any other website (such as Twitter), we would not be having this conversation, but the information would still be the same, and when this information is eventually re-added with another reference, that reference would be an article referring to the AMA. The website is irrelevant; AMAs are Q&As, and therefore reliable sources. Poindextero (talk) 22:27, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You do understand that it that doesn't matter? That's the point you don't seem to grasp. The website does 100% matter. And a source referencing Reddit as their source wouldn't qualify either as republished sources from unreliable sources do not qualify as a reliable source, so don't attempt to find a source that references that from Reddit. It needs to be an independent reliable source.--Rockchalk7 17 23:04, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Gellert Grindelwald. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 17:16, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shrek (franchise), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:33, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tim Burton's/Joel Schumacher's Batman

Template:Tim Burton's/Joel Schumacher's Batman has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 13:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Weekend at Bernie's

Template:Weekend at Bernie's has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Painting17 (talk) 17:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]