User talk:Pixelatrix

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Pmdtechnologies

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Pmdtechnologies, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: PMDTechnologies. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:11, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-paste move

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give PMDTechnologies a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Pmdtechnologies. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. ‑‑mjgilson^T 16:27, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Pmdwiki", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it seems to be the name of a business ('wiki' nonwithstanding) and does not identify an individual user. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. 331dot (talk) 09:14, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Pmdwiki. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article pmdtechnologies, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Your user name suggests that you are associated with the company. If so, please stop editing the article. PamD 14:18, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pmdwiki, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Pmdwiki! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pmdtechnologies

Do you have any financial connection with this company? If so, please note the Terms of use which you agree to with every edit, and the policy on Conflict of interest. Thank you. PamD 15:48, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is fixing the logo and name a COI? We're not Apple or Google, and no one outside the company will take care of this. Pmdwiki (talk) 16:00, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Writing the entire article if you are affiliated with the company (I guess that is what the "We" above means), without having declared that you are part of the company, is certainly COI. Please read and understand the Terms of Use. PamD 16:03, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my bad. I have an affiliation with the company, and I just wanted to update the old name and logo because it is outdated for three years(!) and obviously no one outside the company cares. I should have chosen a better user name but I was not aware that this would constitute a COI. Reading long terms of use in their entirety is not what you usually do when you register somewhere, do you? Pmdwiki (talk) 16:14, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COI

I have sympathy with small-medium sized organisations wanting to be represented correctly on Wikipedia (full disclosure: having recently joined a newly formed WP:N community organisation I'd started to draft an article for the group and changed my username to show my connection to it, after getting to grips with WP:COI for the first time since I started editing about 10 years ago; I still plan to use WP:COIN to work towards submitting it to the live mainspace of Wikpedia). That said, you should be aware that, as a neutral and free (as in freedom) encyclopedia, we need to be extremely cautious when people affiliated with organisations edit associated pages: eternal vigilance and all that.

It's not impossible for you to help Wikipedia cover your company better, mostly by finding as many reliable sources (and seriously, read WP:RS if you want to make sure the ones you suggest aren't just dismissed) which mention your company or its products, and posting these links to Talk:Pmdtechnologies, ideally with suggestions for a summary of each source making sure you give the exact wording you propose in as balanced and neutral a way as you can, including {{cite}}-formatted footnotes, and working through WP:COIN for openness, transparency and to help us keep Wikipedia as neutral as possible.

Trying to delete this user talk page, reverting changes made by other editors, asking others to "clean up the... total mess" your WP:COI editing caused indirectly, and renaming your account from User:Pmdwiki to User:Noaffiliation wasn't a great start, so if you want it my advice is (as well as getting your account renamed again, and making a clear statement of your exact connection to pmdtechnologies on your user page) to make sure you're completely familiar with WP:COI, be careful as you go, but don't give up! Feel free to get in touch if you want. ‑‑mjgilson^T 15:20, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for offering your assistance! Regarding my bumpy start at Wikipedia, you should know the only reason I signed up was so I could upload the current company logo and my choice of user name was imprudent. I changed it because I was prompted to do so per Wikipedia:Username_policy, so it was not an attempt to cover up something. I actually wanted to leave the article as it is simply because it is not my job (I only happen to be the one knowledgeable in several online media because of my private endeavors). I could delegate this all to someone else (and less experienced) or perhaps to an agency any time but I'm not sure whether this would work out better.

Regarding the missing references and reliable sources, maybe I can still find something better. But I don't understand why the Image Sensor Blog, for instance, is dismissed per se just because it is a blog. It's a third party and is the #1 place to report on and review the newest developments in the field of image sensors. And regarding Engadget, "Engadget has in the past ranked among the top five in the "Technorati top 100"[3]'" This sure sounds reputable. Noaffiliation (talk) 16:56, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so I've made the case at the deletion discussion that the article should be kept if we completely overhaul it, basically having to start from scratch (the infobox you were working on can probably stay!). I've also taken a look through some of the sources you mentioned on the talk page, and they look like we can probably work with them. That said, to keep things completely above board, please rename your account to a more neutral wording, and state your affiliation to the company on your user page per WP:COI. Cheers. ‑‑mjgilson^T 15:49, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done that. Thanks for your support. Noaffiliation (talk) 16:11, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help, and cheers for working with us on this. I'll work on the page as and when I have the time; make sure to tell your colleagues to keep an eye out for news articles to improve the page too. ‑‑mjgilson^T 13:22, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]