User talk:Plunging

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Plunging! Thank you for your contributions. I am GizzyCatBella and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
How to write a great article
The Teahouse, our help forum for new users
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! GizzyCatBella🍁 05:50, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. You deleted data with sources without consensus. Deleting data with sources is different from deleting data without sources. When deleting data with sources, you must carefully provide evidence that the data and sources are contrary to Wikipedia rules. Simply. Also, do not forget about Wikipedia:Stable version. You have made new changes, the new changes were considered controversial and a stable version was restored. Moreover, it does not forget the Wikipedia:CYCLE (new edit + revert = discuss cycle). If you continue your destructive activity, I will report your account to be blocked. This is last warning. Subtropical-man (✉ | en-2) 12:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, I saw Wikipedia ethical guidelines linked on the talk page. MOS:DEADNAME is ethical guideline, you are breaking it.--Plunging (talk) 12:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And please stop breaking phillar of Wikipedia: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Articles should have various sources, and not only favorable Margot. Subtropical-man (✉ | en-2) 12:51, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subtropical, if you call Margot 'worthless', then you are hardly neutral. Also, stop trolling and threatening people with this 'vandalism' tag. You did it to me and another editor, yet you are the one vandalising and deadnaming. Malick78 (talk) 12:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What Malick said. Stop dredging up violent sources that misgender her and that are not reliable. Margot has been covered in the world press, no worldwide source misgenders her.--Plunging (talk) 12:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again: please stop breaking phillar of Wikipedia: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Articles should have various sources, and not only favorable Margot. I even compromised and replaced the source of radiomaryja with several others. Subtropical-man (✉ | en-2) 13:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Plunging reported by User:Escape Orbit (Result: ). Thank you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 14:51, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Your recent editing history at Margot (activist) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:00, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I removed slanderous material against a living breathing person, but I shall stop and let others deal with it.--Plunging (talk) 16:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]