User talk:Plkrtn

Image Tagging Image:6jigsm.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:6jigsm.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 00:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wookiepedia

AFD debate pages are not reused for a new nomination. Please consider using WP:DRV if you insist on having the debate reopened. —ptk✰fgs 07:26, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I created a LOST Wikia page. Here The LOST Wikia --Iron Chef 00:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oi!

How come you banned me on Lostpedia for creating pages that clearly stated they were rumors, and could only be confirmed by ABC Medianet?! A lot of other members did the same thing, but did they get banned too? I don't think so. --SilvaStorm

What about the person who created the Not in Portland page? And apart from that, banning me doesn't help, as I have no other way to contact you (besides this). I'm not a vandal or anything, and I understand that these pages shouldn't be made, but what about the person who creates it before confirmation? Do you ban them too? --SilvaStorm

Yeah, I'm sorry, I didn't think it would be such a problem since the page/s could just be locked until confirmation, as was done with the Not in Portland page originally. So are you saying that any time I create a page relating to something in the future, I will be banned? Is it just me or does that seem a little harsh? Bans should be for people who seek to create havoc, not for those who are trying to inform and keep up-to-date members of the Lost community. I would like it if you removed the ban, and might as well use this opportunity to ask you this: Is it okay if I make a page titled "Season 3, Episode 7" which can be a placeholder for that episode until we have a confirmed title? It would be useful, especially for the talk and theories pages. Thanks. --SilvaStorm

By the way, wasn't my source on the Kimberly Estrada talk page enough (the audio interview)? --SilvaStorm

Okay, I understand. Will you remove the ban? As I've said before, I only want to help improve Lostpedia. --SilvaStorm

Thanks for removing it. In future, if for whatever reason you are going to ban me, could you please let me explain myself before possibly banning me? I don't do things without good reason (and I will read the rules again). --SilvaStorm

Yeah, hi, the ban is still active...could you remove it? --SilvaStorm

Is this really the place to discuss events on another wiki? --Milo H Minderbinder 15:56, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Um, for some reason I am still banned on Lostpedia, but it says it was done by Santa. Could you unblock me? Thanks. --SilvaStorm

I was referring to his bringing it up here in the first place, not to your response, Plkrtn. Sorry I wasn't clear. I do agree that people can be touchy about the whole mention of it. --Milo H Minderbinder 15:15, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey I know you your from lostpedia.--Pediaguy16 00:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok cool--Pediaguy16 20:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:West Bromwich Albion crest.png

Thanks for uploading Image:West Bromwich Albion crest.png. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then you need to specify who owns the copyright, please. If you got it from a website, then a link to the website where it was taken from with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:03, 11 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 02:03, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Manchester. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The failure to assume good faith refers to the edit summary where you accused a good-faith reversion as being the edit of a vandal. DDStretch (talk) 10:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NSONGS

Please take a look at the notability guidelines for songs before editing The Winner's Song again. It should remain a redirect unless you can cite reliable sources that establish how the song is notable outside the show it is from. --Boffob (talk) 16:22, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Peterkaywinnerssong.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Peterkaywinnerssong.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 17:09, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Jedward

I have nominated Jedward, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jedward. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 14:41, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Jedward

I have nominated Jedward, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jedward. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 14:47, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Peterkaywinnerssong.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Peterkaywinnerssong.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:56, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Abbot

I don't know if you are new but your insertion of disputed content cited to blogs and unreliable locatons is a clear mistake and you shouyld revert it. Content such as that that is weakly cited to unreliable locations and has been removed should not be replaced at all. Off2riorob (talk) 13:28, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hugo Blick

The article Hugo Blick has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. VQuakr (talk) 04:10, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Avengers (2012 film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:35, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:The Avengers (2012 film). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your frustration. I don't understand your impatience. You've reverted me twice now. Next time will be three. One more after that will violate WP:3RR, and we have to give a warning about that. Please join the talk-page discussion. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:16, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, continue to remove multiple verified sources, from the official site, from the BBFC and from a journalistic source, for a third time. If you do not think the three verifiable sources are not sufficient enough to constitute evidence compared to one which is spurious at best, then I'm afraid there is some flawed thinking occurring on your behalf. WP:OWN. If I can see a problem that can be fixed. Do so. --Plkrtn (talk) 22:21, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Journalistic sources vary; even the UK newspapers can't agree on a title. That leaves it an open question, and on the article talk page I have laid out logical, rationale reasons for my concerns. There is no WP:DEADLINE. We can take time to get it right. If the newspapers can't even agree, how are we supposed to? --Tenebrae (talk) 22:53, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Starting with your first revert at 09:15, 3 May 2012, you've now made three. One more and you violate 3RR. This is the required warning. Please note that TWO editors, myself and TriiipleThreat, have each reverted your edit. You are edit-warring with two editors. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:12, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Adrian Durham. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 14:22, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Plkrtn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ardian Syaf

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ardian Syaf. You've already been previously warned for this type of behavior. If you continue, you risk being blocked from editing. Nightscream (talk) 13:07, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Plkrtn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Old west bromwich albion crest.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Old west bromwich albion crest.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 06:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kit body westbrom1112h.png

The file File:Kit body westbrom1112h.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I'm Miner Editor. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Matt Taibbi, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Miner Editor (talk) 15:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Plkrtn! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Matt Taibbi that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Miner Editor (talk) 16:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]