User talk:Playclever

Marvin Lee Stadium Picture

Thanks for putting up the picture on the article page! Rasadam (talk) 03:28, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Southampton wards/suburbs etc

No worries about the constituency corrections - you're certainly correct, it's quite a muddle with some wards straddling 2 or sometimes 3 constituencies! I also wanted to say thanks for getting involved with the suburb articles, as not many people have taken an interest in these. There is a thought in the back of my head about merging the two templates as there's a fair bit of duplication, but I've no strong feelings either way. Waggers (talk) 13:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Monkey Island

Yeah, you gave some reasons, but I'd like to see you expand on them if you can, please. I'm a hyper-inclusionist and tend to think everything should have its own page. Thanos6 (talk) 03:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Romania

You're from Romania? Sir Lothar (talk) 01:53, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! PeterSymonds (talk) 23:57, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 28 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kinoautomat, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Keep up the good work! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:41, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 20:36, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Median Wage

Do you Know what the median wage in Romania is (PPP)?--J intela (talk) 01:19, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Google Chrome

Thanks for your edit, the lead is much more readable now. :) Don't know why no one else thought of doing it that way. Have a good day. — ^Fatal Error 23:50, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

adventure game

Thanks for helping with the clean-up of adventure game. I like what you've done with the lead. There was too much clutter in there. If you have seen some of the other leads you would find most of them are just summaries. I noticed you took some stuff out of the definition probably because it's already covered in the lead. That's cool with me... as long as it is covered somewhere. But based on Wikipedia:Good article criteria and WP:lead I think it's supposed to have no citations... the lead is like a summary of the body of the article. That was my goal for having that first statement in the definition even if it resembles the lead. What do you think?

Glad to help. Actually, you prompted me to pick up WP again after a prolonged absence ;)

The bit I removed from the definition was the text about adventure games being about puzzles and exploration, and not involving physical challenges / combat - my take was that this was already discussed sufficiently elsewhere in the definition section, using the same source (fundamentals)... so I think the ref could be removed from the lead and the statement would be sufficiently backed up.

The WP:LEADCITE guideline says "editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material" - as above we could probably get rid of the citation for the lead. Could perhaps talk about the difficulty of multiplayer design elsewhere and simply mention that they are usually single player in the lead, without citation - that's not so challengeable. The other two citations in the lead I would probably advocate keeping. Playclever (talk) 18:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also I am having trouble finding good web sources about the genre. There's one from IGN but it was not too useful. Everything else seems to be a blog or personal website. Think you can poke around some of the major gaming sites and turn anything up? Jontesta (talk) 16:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll have a poke around :) Playclever (talk) 18:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- I agree with you about the lead. But maybe we should try to stabilize the "game design" section first. Then we'll know what's worth repeating / reorganizing. I will work more on the game design section within the week. Jontesta (talk) 06:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

update

It took me more like two weeks. But I looked through my book one more time and tried to finish up the article. I think it looks much better! There is some other interesting stuff in the book about different interfaces / graphical styles, as well as some historical tangents about major games and so on. I would really like to see this article elevated in quality. Would you like to request a peer review? Sometimes it takes a while to get feedback... maybe we should just go for gold and nominate it for good article status, and don't be afraid of criticisms that encourage us to improve the article more and try again later? Jontesta (talk) 23:37, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Open

220.244.126.31 (talk) 22:27, 1 February 2014 (UTC)Plexicushion Plexicushion - Plexicushion is not faster than Rebound Ace. You're 100% wrong. Pretty much all tennis courts are slower these days compared to ten years ago and Plexicushion is no exception. All the pro players have said it was so slower. "I think the surface is a little bit too slow, in my opinion," said Federer. There are so more quotes from players here http://www.talkabouttennis.com/forum/threads/8821-Players-Plexicushion-too-slow . Even if you compare the highlights on YouTube of matches played on the Rebound Ace courts and compare it with Plexicushion, you will notice the rallies are visibly slower on plexicushion. It's not a HUGE difference, but Plexicushion definitely SLOWER than Rebound Ace.[reply]

See User talk:220.244.126.31 for a response. Thanks. Playclever (talk) 22:52, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Secret Files 2 Screenshot - Nina.jpg

Hi , I'm Sfan00_IMG , I note you uploaded this image, would you mind expanding the rationale so it address ALL 10 points of WP:NFCC ?

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:59, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

hi

I don't know how to send message on wiki I hope this works...

Why is my video inappropriate? I provide visual info of the pyramid for people that are considering the climb and also provide info about the pyramid its self, how is that inappropriate? When I was looking for places to travel I would much rather see a video than read the text its the visual aspect of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adairtrainer (talk • contribs) 22:18, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon's Den

You made a mistake you dumbass... it isn't an episode list now is it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by173.243.41.122 (talk) 23:21, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on talk

about my video

I am sorry for misplacing the video, I have since posted it in the tourism section (witch you have deleted again) where I think it belongs. I in no way am posting for promotional reasons. I do no list my website or even my location do I? I will post it again in the tourism section and if you continue to delete it I will continue to post it. It is in NO WAY a negative contribution it provides more VISUAL info than any photo ever will. Please leave it on you have no reason to take it off. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adairtrainer (talk • contribs) 23:56, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My video does not do any of these... "Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product"

My video is NOT inappropriate. I am just showing what its like to climb the pyramid and how fast it can be done how is this Inappropriate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adairtrainer (talk • contribs) 00:08, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Secret of Monkey Island Manual & Dial-a-Pirate.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Secret of Monkey Island Manual & Dial-a-Pirate.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. czar 07:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Playclever. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bargate Lion.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bargate Lion.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]