User talk:J intela

Please, please correct the spelling and capitalization of the changes you made to the PCT article, and cite the information against published scholarship. Also, please see WP:NOR CRCulver 23:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not add a citation immediately, I will remove your additions as Original Research. Already one of the pages you've created has been deleted as violating WP:NOR, and it seems like you're doing the same here. CRCulver 23:53, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you deliberately introduce incorrect information into a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CRCulver 00:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello J intela! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- —Centrx→talk • 05:25, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Copyright and Original research

You are not permitted to copy text written by others except with explicit permission sent to the Wikimedia Foundation.
Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable: it must have been previously published in reliable sources. No original research.

Do not continue in this manner. —Centrx→talk • 05:25, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of dictators

Read the list intro. It says, among other things, that the list is for dictators who governed after 1789. It's an anachronism to label someone a dictator before then, because no country had explicit limits on the power of the executive. The exception to this is the Roman dictators, who have their own list. Gazpacho 02:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--J intela 07:20, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm asking my question here becouse your discution page is blocked, please answere it. I want to Expand on to Paleolithic Continuity Theory, Upper Paleolithic and the Gravettian using this source [1], can I? Please read it all the way thrugh before aswering --J intela 07:24, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

you can, if you figure out this site's sources -- unfortunately, the writeup doesn't have a bibliography, so we don't know how much of this is in accord with PCT. It would be much better if you got hold of a book by Alinei or so. Also, please note that while the page you link to is an essay, Wikipedia articles should be in encyclopedic tone and should not read like essays. (see WP:MoS, WP:NOT). Finally, you can use Talk:Paleolithic Continuity Theory to discuss changes to that article, no need to discuss it on my user page :) dab (ᛏ) 09:53, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

Thanks for the e-mail. You're good to go. E-mail me if you're still having problems.

Lucky 6.9 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

From now on when i want to try out new editing devisis i will do it on my own talk page i cant get blocked for that can i?

Of course not. Best thing to do is to use the sandbox, though. Otherwise, all those experiments will wind up on the edit history of your talk page. The sandbox is automatically cleared by a bot anyway. That way, anything you leave there will get deleted automatically. - Lucky 6.9 03:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Glad that I was on; I just saw why the system wasn't unblocking you. It had put an HTML symbol in your username, making you "J_intela" instead of just "J intela." You should be ood to go. Sorry about the inconvenience. - Lucky 6.9 01:30, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of dictators

I certainly don't see why that would be a problem. Sounds like a great idea! Personally, I've never created a list from scratch so I'm unsure on the formatting. You may wish to check out some of the other lists to see what the layout is like. - Lucky 6.9 23:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

US metro area list

Connecticut is not part of the New York City metropolitan statistical area. Bridgeport-Stamford and New Haven are separate metro areas per the U.S. Census Bureau. Please do not insert incorrect information into these lists. Thanks. --Polaron | Talk 06:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Norway, Iceland and Switzerland and EU accession

Hi J intela! First of all, thanks for the congratulations: it's a great honour for Romania to be part of the EU! To answer your question regarding Norway, Iceland and Switzerland's EU accession, I think there are various reasons why these countries aren't members. First of all, all three countries have a tradition of euroscepticism, and EU accession is not publicly favoured by any of them at the current moment (according to opinion polls). The differences for this vary between them. Norway and Iceland fear that EU regulations will harm several of their industries (most prominently, fishing, and particularly whaling). Additionally, since Norway and Iceland are among the wealthiest countries in Europe, they will be large per-capita net contributors to the EU budget, and for this reason EU accession is seen as a financial burden producing very little returns (also, these countries have no regions below 75% of the EU average income, meaning the EU will not provide funding as part of its regional development assistance). In fact, these countries, as members of EFTA, already benefit from free trade with the EU member states, as well as free movement of persons, passport-free access (Schengen Agreement) - formal EU accession thus becomes a net cost rather than a net benefit. Culturally, both countries are rather insular (similar to the UK, whose population is also rather eurosceptic), and for this reason they are traditionally quite sceptical about integrationist and regionalist movements, particularly with non-Nordic countries. It is important to note that they are both full members of the Nordic Council and both Norway and Iceland have favoured integration within the Nordic group but not outside it; in fact, Sweden and Finland only joined the EU as late as 1995 due to their ties with the Nordic countries and the desire in the 1980s and 1990s to create a "Nordic" regional bloc distinct from the "continental European" bloc.

The Swiss case is a bit different, even though, to be honest, I actually think Switzerland has the highest chances of these three countries to accede to the EU. The main barrier to accession has been the Swiss tradition of neutrality, which has even prevented it from joining the United Nations until a few years ago. In recent years, there has been a gradual reversal in this policy, as Switzerland has signed the Schengen Agreement and has also collaborated with the EU in several other fields. Aside from the doctrine of neutrality, there is no other reason why Switzerland is incompatible with EU accession, particularly since it is very centrally located on the continent and trades extensively with the EU. So, as it moves away from neutrality, the country may very well join the EU soon (Austria, also a neutral country and non-member of NATO, joined the EU in 1995). If you have any other questions related to the European Union, feel free to ask :) Cheers, Ronline ✉ 10:34, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Palestinian Civil War

Why did you post a copy of some article's talk page to make an article on the Palestinian Civil War? I have deleted it. Academic Challenger 03:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:New York Metropolitan Area Counties Illustration.png

Thanks for uploading Image:New York Metropolitan Area Counties Illustration.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalizing user pages

You should not vandalize user pages such as you did here even if they are anonymous IP addresses. I appreciate your desire to contribute to articles such as ethanol fuel, but you should not just delete information that you disagree with, especially when it has a verifiable citation. Perhaps if we start building a consensus on the discussion page, we can build a better article all around! --Chuck Sirloin 04:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, contrary to your post on my talk page, I am not "working for the cattle companies in cohoots with the oil comapnies becous [I] dont want to see the price of corn go up to save the nation becous [I] want it to feed [my] waistfull cattle witch is a major harm to the enviermant." --Chuck Sirloin 04:35, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate your zest for life, I think that the 15 posts in a half hour to my talk page was a little excessive. I have been a wikipedia reader for a long while now, which should explain my familiarity with the system. It was not my intent to boss you around, I was merely pointing out some issues and striving for teamwork. Cheers, --Chuck Sirloin 14:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Civil War

That is how sources are defining it now. Generally speaking, the fact that Hamas is taking over Fatah positions has been the tipping point. This is going beyond mere skirmishes. ~Rangeley (talk) 01:57, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you should have moved the timeline article, not created a new and then redirected. Page history was lost--TheFEARgod (Ч) 16:20, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Land reform in Hungary

Land distribution was part of the greater process of compensation. Everybody who lost his/her property (except corporations) received "tickets of compensation" (kárpótlási jegyek). This was a special share that contained the value of your claim against the state. The value was established by the Office of Compensation (Kárpótlási Hivatal). The upper limit of the compensation was 5 million forints/person. Descendants of the original owners also got their tickets. With the tickets you were able to buy 1, privatized state properties 2, lands of collective and state farms, 3, municipal flats and 4, annuity. Many former landowner bought back his farm but the majority of them only turned their tickets into money. Between 1992 and 1995 ticket trade was a great business in Hungary. Collective farms were abolished and the lands were sold on auctions. Zello 01:51, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archaea deletion.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Archaea. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- MarcoTolo 03:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Articles should not be moved, as you did to Southern Ocean, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive, reflecting the most common useage. We have some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Thank you. Ckatz^chat _spy 20:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Western Colony.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Western Colony.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 11:06, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to New Jersey. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Michael Greiner 02:36, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That still is original research which is against Wikipedia policy. Find a source, then add it in. And for what it's worth, I don't know many people who consider Ocean and Mercer counties part of the New York Metro area.--Michael Greiner 04:41, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's what the article says, but it isn't what people consider them as.--Michael Greiner 23:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Poverty. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jons63 (talk) 13:10, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Poverty

Hi. Sorry about the late reply, I've been traveling over the last two weeks. What article are you referring to? Thanks. --Patrick (talk) 04:48, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ChiPitts

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to ChiPitts. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:Mynameinc, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. my name inc-Review me 18:09, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian Protest talk page

Hi J intela, I've reverted your last change to Talk:2009 Iranian election protests in accordance with WP:NOTFORUM
— Ω (talk) 18:39, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Your recent edit to the page Derek Jeter appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. The series isn't over yet. Muboshgu (talk) 02:56, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of LIst of countries by GDP per capitia (PPP) adjusted for inflation in 1980

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on LIst of countries by GDP per capitia (PPP) adjusted for inflation in 1980 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jenks24 (talk) 09:55, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of countries by GDP per capitia (PPP) adjusted for inflation in 1980 for deletion

The article List of countries by GDP per capitia (PPP) adjusted for inflation in 1980 is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of countries by GDP per capitia (PPP) adjusted for inflation in 1980 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jenks24 (talk) 08:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Mao suit a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Zhongshan suit. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Quigley (talk) 06:11, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Year2005-us-temperature-graph.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Year2005-us-temperature-graph.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:17, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what to say, the system has your account as the uploader.... Maybe someone was on a shared computer? Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Cold War-1970.png

Thanks for uploading File:Cold War-1970.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Washing machine does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Reify-tech (talk) 18:36, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I tried talking with you

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

January 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Israeli-occupied territories‎. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 16:20, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violating WP:3RR per WP:ARBPIA on the page Israeli-occupied territories,

you have been blocked from editing for 36 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there. Bbb23 (talk) 16:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.

That was a one sided account, I did not give my personal opinion, I provided sources to support my changes, and revised my edits to the article to address his concerns about the sources. Could I at least have a more detailed description about how I violated procedure? Is it reversions of a specific editor or total reversions in general?

OK I now Understand the three revert rule though I thought my last revision wasn't a revert but addressing of the concerns of a different editor.

Your last revision was a revert as it changed the text of the article. Your motive doesn't alter that. In any event, although I blocked you for violating 3RR, before that you violated WP:1RR, which is a restriction that is noted on the talk page of the article and every time you edit the article in an edit notice. I also took into account that you continued to edit the article even after the report was filed at WP:AN3.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:02, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All right, I now know revert rules, and where to look up some specific rules and policies.

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Cold War-1970.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:08, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tragen Appliances Company

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tragen Appliances Company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 13:08, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, J intela. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, J intela. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, J intela. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:New Netherlands.gif

The file File:New Netherlands.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:New Netherlands.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:17, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]