Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Athena Kourtis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Pkslrrrr!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!02:50, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking the time to review my first article submission. I believe this biography meets all notability criteria, but I tried my best to include a better variety of non-primary sources in this updated submission. If that's not the issue, please let me know so that I can go back in and fix. Much appreciated! Pkslrrrr (talk) 21:43, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It should meet WP:NACADEMIC before accepted. Authors profile on sites like scholar google, scoops, e.t.c. isn't necessary, because it doesn't signify how notable, see MOS:EXTERNALLINKS. Also, primary sources are same as above and for that reason, we need less of his/her publications and we require reviews of her own works, coverage in multiple reliable sources, see WP:SIGCOV. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!21:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for the delay! I believe WP:NACADEMIC is met, under the first, second, and third criteria (as a member of the Red Book Committee of the American Academy of Pediatrics). In the context of Wikipedia submissions, by "unnecessary", do you mean that I should omit Scopus / Google Scholar metrics? While she is extensively cited, I'm not sure I'm finding much in the way of significant coverage, especially in English sources (there are some in Greek). The latest submission of the biography should have significantly more coverage than the first submission. Are more required to pass review? Once again, this is my first submission, and your feedback is valued and greatly appreciated. Pkslrrrr (talk) 13:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Athena Kourtis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
