User talk:Pinzunski

Welcome!

Hi Pinzunski! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 03:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yo-Hey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dragon Gate. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing at Sporting CP

Stop copy-pasting code from S.L. Benfica to Sporting CP. SLBedit (talk) 18:14, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Sporting CP while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. SLBedit (talk) 18:16, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if misinterpreted my edits, im not trying to copypast Benfica's lead just actually complete Sporting's lead instead, which you could see by the UEFA records and members parts, and stadium, their lead is very incomplete for a club of their size, could we work on something to improve their lead, in order to reach a consensus?

Thank you, Pinzunski (talk) 21:49, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you just use your own words instead? SLBedit (talk) 23:45, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because were conflicted on how the lead should be written and to appease both sides, i think we should cooperate. Pinzunski (talk) 23:34, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cristiano Ronaldo

Hi. Your editing is fine, the only issue is adding too much detail. We previously had to cut down the article due to excessive size (articles can get too big, and tagged). So this is just a message to make sure detail is kept to a minimum. Cheers. Nampa DC (talk) 02:12, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thanks for your feedback. Pinzunski (talk) 03:58, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Your edit to Mykhailo Mudryk has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of international goals scored by Harry Kane for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of international goals scored by Harry Kane, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international goals scored by Harry Kane (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Anatoliy Trubin

added a link pointing to Roger Schmidt

Samuel Soares

added a link pointing to Roger Schmidt

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Roberto Martínez

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Roberto Martínez, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:56, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of international goals scored by Cristiano Ronaldo

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of international goals scored by Cristiano Ronaldo, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:01, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 23:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So to answer, im gonna disclose all the IPs I used, I did not created any account other than the one you blocked, and those are the following:

145.44.96.160

77.249.58.62

145.44.96.90

Those are the IPs adresses that I used nothing more. I will retreat all legal threaths that I made under the agreement that I am unblocked. Just for the record, I have more things in my life to do, that's why I took a long time to answer, its not because I quit on defending my reputation. Pinzunski (talk) 15:16, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pinzunski (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Recently I was on editing dispute with User:RevampedEditor, who accused me of being a sockpuppet of an User:Martimc123, without proper evidence, as such I was block by User:Bbb23, who decided to block me without trying to undestand my side of the argument, and decided to block me due to a personal bias. After revealing that my blocking process would have legal consequences, if they did not provided evidence that I was the user: Martimc123, User:Dreamy Jazz determined that I was unrelated to him, which is the truth, which you could check on her Talkpage, as such, request my unblocking with immediate effect.

Decline reason:

Clear violation of WP:NLT. Yamla (talk) 13:52, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It sounds like you are repeating the legal threats made by multiple IPs of yours, all of which have been blocked for block evasion and legal threats. Also, you distort the sequence of events when you say that Dreamy Jazz found you unrelated to Martimc123 because of your legal threats. Before an unblock request from you can even be considered, you have to disclose all the accounts you've created, all the IPs you've used, and unequivocally retract the legal threats.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So to answer, im gonna disclose all the IPs I used I did not created any account other than the one you blocked, and those are the following: 145.44.96.160 77.249.58.62 145.44.96.90

Those are the IPs I used nothing more. I will retreat all legal threaths that I made under the agreement that I am unblocked. Just for the record, I have more things in my life, that's why I took a long time to answer, its not because I quit on defending my reputation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinzunski (talk • contribs)

This list is nowhere near complete. --Yamla (talk) 00:00, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is complete, if I knew more I would have told. Pinzunski (talk) 17:50, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I don't know how to see how many IPs I used, the only one's I can recall are the 3 that I gave you, because i forgot to Log In before my edits, only that. Pinzunski (talk) 21:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pinzunski (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Recently I was on editing dispute with User:RevampedEditor, who accused me of being a sockpuppet of an User:Martimc123, without proper evidence, as such I was block by User:Bbb23, who decided to block me without trying to undestand my side of the argument, and decided to block me due to a personal bias. After some back and fourth, User:Dreamy Jazz determined that I was unrelated to him, which is the truth, which you could check on her Talkpage. I revealed to the IP address and rectrated the legal treaths as requested. As such, I request my unblocking with immediate effect. So I repeat I withdraw any legal threat that I made. I just want to be unblocked.

Decline reason:

Per Deepfriedokra and Bbb23 below, please request a review (WP:SO) after 6 months (April 22, 2024), and do not evade your block by editing logged out or with a sockpuppet during that time. It can be reconsidered then. Daniel (talk) 08:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #80690

is closed. I guess this is not Martimc123, but the WP:LOUTSOCK and WP:NLT remain problems. This has all been hard for me to follow. Decline copied below. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:05, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you evaded your block by editing while not logged in. That in and of itself is sockpuppetry. You have an unblock request on your talk page, and that's where this needs sorting. But once again, unless you unconditionally withdraw the legal threat on your talk page, you cannot be unblocked. Sorry, I cannot help you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:06, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I already did, I'm not advacing with any legal proceedings. I only used the IPs to be able to defend myself. I repeat I unconditionally withdraw any legal threat that I made the only thing that I want is to be unblocked, nothing more. Pinzunski (talk) 15:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Legal threat withdrawn. Not sure if you can see your way to agreeing to unblock. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: No, I oppose an unblock. This is a disruptive user, even if not a sock of an LTA. Also, I'm fairly certain they were editing logged out even before they were blocked. The best I would be willing to do is the standard offer, and providing they have not evaded their block with IPs or named accounts during the 6-month period, I would consider unblocking them at that time.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:35, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, I what do I really need to prove that I am not a disruptive user, before being blocked you could see that my edits were constructive. I just withdrew all legal threats that I made, what do I really need to be unblocked? I am really trying to cooperate with everybody, I don't understand why do you see me as a threat. Pinzunski (talk) 13:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You weren't complying with policy before you were blocked, and you're not being fully forthcoming now. I suggest you respond to Yamla's comment ("This list is nowhere near complete") above.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I already answer. What is the best way for us to resolve this issue and for you to unblock. The only way I can get an answer from you or anybody is through the UTRS, and I dont want to also get block in there, so just help me and unblock me. Can we just end this for god's sake, you know that I'm not user:Martimc123, you know that I wasnt doing Sock puppetry. What's the point of still being block, really I just dont get it, is this a personal agenda, why I am still blocked?

Please dont forget to reply or turn a blind eye (like I feel you did recently), I just want to resolve this issue as soon as possible. Please. Pinzunski (talk) 20:51, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I already declined at UTRS, so given the not-Martimc123 aspects and the withdrawal of the legal threat, I think the WP:Standard Offer is the way to go. That would mean eligibility for unblock April 22, 2024. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]