User talk:Pillow da Don

September 2023

Hello, I'm Belbury. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ghost hunting have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 08:24, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional? I do not even know the individual nor do I live in his home state. The sources I used were all mainstream, non-local websites and news coverages. Nor did it contain any links for anyone to "purchase" or "buy" anything.I will re-add this edit later with cite web templates, I will omit the mention of him being a YouTuber if thats where the concern lies. Christopher Bores. Pillow da Don (talk) 20:44, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A section such as "Notable paranormal investigators" should be written with some balance. It's currently only covering Harry Price and Ed and Lorraine Warren, the three most famous investigators of the 20th century. It shouldn't devote a third subsection to YouTuber who does live shows for a venue in Ohio, implying that he is the only significant paranormal investigator of the last twenty years. Please do not add Chris Bores back to the article. Belbury (talk) 21:09, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Bores moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Christopher Bores. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and With respect to sourcing, WP:ILC, WP:IMDB, and WP:INTERVIEW are some guideposts to improve the draft.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – robertsky (talk) 11:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Bores (YouTuber) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chris Bores (YouTuber), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PICKLEDICAE🥒 17:29, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ne-Yo discography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages A Girl Like Me and Real Talk. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Legend discography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Damita Jo and Back to Love.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Russ (rapper)

As reliable sources mainly refer to him as Russ, and he only uses it professionally it needs to be made clear that this is his better known name. For example the Elvis Presley article gives his full name followed by better known monomously as Elvis, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 23:03, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Worth it

hi hi. Chris Brown wrote that record. Check its official credits. I don't know why you're continuously removing it (without even giving an explaination for it). An explanation from you is needed. Lean Harvey Oswald (talk) 11:41, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you're talking about the song "Worth It" by Young Thug, it was not included due to that song instead interpolating "Autumn Leaves" by Chris Brown instead, hence why the songs co-writers, Kendrick Lamar and B.A.M. are credited on the "Worth It".^[1] According to the guideline that's been established for the section, it needs to be songs Breezy (or whichever artist) had direct credit of involvement with. That's why it says "(excluding guest appearances, interpolations, and samples)." Pillow da Don (talk) 01:39, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

^ https://genius.com/Young-thug-worth-it-lyrics

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CeeLo Green discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afrodisiac.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited August Alsina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Do You Mind.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeezy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lose My Mind.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rino Romano, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:DOB Waxworker (talk) 14:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This birth date was from Wikidata. If you’ll delete it, you may as well delete it on there too. Pillow da Don (talk) 15:07, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Future (rapper), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ihateneo (talk) 19:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please take some brain power to think about your edit. All I did here was capitalized a term for which the subject was already capitalized. Pillow da Don (talk) 04:23, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to 2 Chainz, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Your latest edit seemed fine though. ihateneo (talk) 19:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited French Montana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shot Caller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Issue about track listing template

Hey Pillow. There's recent discussion for track listing template. If you have time, your comments are always appreciated. 2001:D08:2910:B6D2:17AD:92A:C97:B78A (talk) 17:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited T.I., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kill the King.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ja Rule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Livin' It Up.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Pillow da Don. Thank you for your work on Gamma (media company). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editing while logged out

which you are doing here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mase&action=history as the IP 144.129.234.114 is discouraged, see WP:LOGOUT --FMSky (talk) 18:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. However, unfortunately, I have noticed you have been reverting some decent, sourced edits across the site without explanation. One such time, undid your own revert because the edit I made was constructive and improved the article. If you continue to do this, try to supply an edit summary so editors can know what to improve on with the version of which you undid. Understand that we (except for a minute few) are all trying to build a better site here, and the edits of mine and others take extended amounts of time and research. While I concur that guidelines need to be met, please don’t make your time as a Wikipedian dismissive of this and needlessly militant, or worse yet, stressful, for yourself and others.

—P.S. If the rationale for doing so in that information is unsourced, take closer looks at the references provided (even if it’s an article that you’re not personally interested in) Pillow da Don (talk) 02:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Willie Montague for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Willie Montague, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willie Montague until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 12:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I created the article, and it was created too early. It was fair to delete the article as it was meant to be a redirect in the first place. Pillow da Don (talk) 01:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading edit summaries

Why do you write "WP:NUMBERS" and then edit something completely different? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lil_Dicky&diff=prev&oldid=1222468755 FMSky (talk) 23:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. Pillow da Don (talk) 23:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chief Keef, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Back from the Dead.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Chris Bores

Hello Pillow da Don, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Chris Bores, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Bores (2nd nomination).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SafariScribe}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://genius.com/Young-thug-worth-it-lyrics

[1]