User talk:Pigmypossum

Welcome!

Hello, Pigmypossum, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! —Recurring dreams 11:34, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From Talk:Miranda Devine

Thankyou, 'D4g0thur', for taking the time and effort to look into this. Your reply is detailed and considered. I take your point about creating a user account.//EDIT// just created account 'Pigmypossum' 203.214.155.23 11:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC) Pigmypossum 11:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm replying here so as not to clutter up the article's talk page. I'm happy to be able to help and I hope you'll continue editing Wikipedia and make many useful contributions in the future. Again, happy editing! D4g0thur 12:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re; Miranda Devine, I just don't know if those descriptions should be included in the introduction. You can say that she is more conservative, but this is slightly libelous. Smkohnstamm

3RR

Please note that reversions of simple vandalism are exempted from the 3RR, and using diffs with multiple intermediate revisions to attempt to hide this fact is disruptive. ⇒ SWATJester ^{Denny Crane.} 21:54, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ⇒ SWATJester ^{Denny Crane.} 22:03, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pigmypossum. The changes you made to the Glenn Milne page are in good faith, but they do violate some wikipedia policies. Firstly, the controversy section was expanded to the extent that it violated WP:UNDUE. Furthermore, if you have read other wikipedia pages, the manual of style WP:MOS, and the copyright policies you will find that we don't create content consisting almost entirely of direct quotes from media sources. You should cite the sources you have read, and succinctly summarise the content in your own words. As for the question about the picutre, I'm afraid I do not have a detailed knowledge of image policies, but the image has not been deleted or proposed for deletion, so maybe it can go back into the article. Recurring dreams 01:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You might be confused by my message: the copyright violation was text, not an image. There ARE some instances when copyrighted images can be included under fair use: try your best to avoid them as they are limited to only certain situations, and always must require that no free alternative exists.

As for the 3RR report, no harm no foul. ⇒ SWATJester ^{Denny Crane.} 01:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Glenn Milne Walkleys.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Glenn Milne Walkleys.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandra Canal

On 15 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alexandra Canal, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 20:48, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gerry Georgatos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gerry Georgatos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerry Georgatos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Drover's Wife (talk) 04:13, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Ray Jackson

Please review your succession of disambiguation of links to "Ray Jackson". You have added some links to a basketball player when from the context it is clearly a musician that is intended. Mutt Lunker (talk) 13:30, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mutt. After seeing your correction, I realised that some links that originally pointed to the basketball player were the wrong person. I'll endeavour to get them correct, and create a new disambiguation page for Ray Jackson. Cheers, Pigmypossum (talk) 13:32, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I've noticed one who is clearly an actor as well. Mutt Lunker (talk) 13:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation page completed. Still trying to sort out some of the links, though any that point to the wrong person must have done so in the first place. Cheers, Pigmypossum (talk) 14:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if we're talking at cross purposes but the links I'm talking about were actively changed from an undisambiguated (lovely word) but not wrong link to Ray Jackson to a clearly incorrect link to Ray Jackson (basketball), i.e. [1], [2] and [3]. Mutt Lunker (talk) 14:32, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pigmypossum. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Glenn Milne Walkleys.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Glenn Milne Walkleys.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of National Roads and Cyclists Association for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Roads and Cyclists Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Roads and Cyclists Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Teraplane (talk) 01:23, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]