User talk:Phycodrys

Phycodrys, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Phycodrys! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Prior accounts

Welcome back. I've appreciated your previous work creating algae articles. It would be good form to list the accounts you have previously used to edit Wikipedia on your user page. It is not required that you do so, but I have seen other people who edited under multiple accounts over time caught up in sock puppet investigations related to another user (editing in a narrow subject area where a blocked user has done some editing leads to a suspicion that any person who has used multiple accounts may be the blocked user). Plantdrew (talk) 00:43, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Laurencia hybrida

I have started an article titled Laurencia hybrid. Please help, I should have entitled it Osmundea hybrid (A.P. De Candolle) K.W.Nam. Please help me change the title - or change it if you will, will be grateful.Phycodrys (talk) 12:40, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the name of the article and a couple of names occurring in the article.Berek (talk) 13:26, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I will be grateful if you would correct the title of the species to "hybrida". Regards.Phycodrys (talk) 13:56, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Plantdrew (talk) 16:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Choreocolax polysiphoniae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chaetomorpha melagonium

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

What have I done wrong? Ref incorrectly entered - somehow,Phycodrys (talk) 20:09, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There was a surplus <ref> tag. Fixed. Huon (talk) 21:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Polyides rotundus moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Polyides rotundus, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp ✉ 11:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polyides rotunda

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 05:10, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]