User talk:Phoe

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Farewell

Hi Phoe. Your retirements are always a bit sudden! As as I said at your first retirement three years ago, thanks for your hard work and for your friendly and helpful attitude. I will retire myself (also for the second time) in only a few days to focus on other (more important) things. Let's hope we're retiring for good this time around! Tryde (talk) 08:49, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your nice words Tryde. When I returned in January 2009, I had hoped that some things have changed, but apparently they have not. Finally Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Craigy144 was the last straw, which let me decide to retire again (however I will be avaiable at Wikisource in future). Perhaps I will give Wikipedia another try after the implantation of Flagged revisions. All the best to you. ~~ Phoe _talk ~~ 14:05, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear. Tryde and Craigy144. Not good. Kittybrewster ☎ 14:45, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lord Lieutenant of Chester

The article Lord Lieutenant of Chester has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Empty list.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:12, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roger Roberts

The article Roger Roberts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:38, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Henry Alexander Nicholas Beaumont

The article Henry Alexander Nicholas Beaumont has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to establish Wikipedia:Notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mais oui! (talk) 21:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jedstrutt.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jedstrutt.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:11, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Baron MacLeod of Fairy listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Baron MacLeod of Fairy. Since you had some involvement with the Baron MacLeod of Fairy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Traditionalist (talk) 03:27, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Raith, Monymaill and Balewarie listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lord Raith, Monymaill and Balewarie. Since you had some involvement with the Lord Raith, Monymaill and Balewarie redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:45, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox baronetage

Template:Infobox baronetage has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox family. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox_baronetage

Template:Infobox_baronetage has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox_peerage_title. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Мандичка^YO 😜 02:10, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anthony Irby (1577–1610) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anthony Irby (1577–1610) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Irby (1577–1610) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Clarityfiend (talk) 03:16, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Letting you know

You have been added to WP:Missing wikipedians. MainPeanut (talk) 17:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]