Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 November 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 17

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 November 25. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:13, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 November 25. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:21, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 November 25. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:21, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 November 25. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:13, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 November 25. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:04, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:03, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary template for a few subsidiaries of a company Joseph2302 (talk) 23:30, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep FWIW, this template does not list these organisations and people:
  1. Aditya Birla Payments Bank
  2. Aditya Birla Capital
  3. Birla Sun Life Asset Management
  4. Aditya Birla Memorial Hospital
  5. Aditya Birla World Academy
  6. Aditya Birla Public School, Rehla
  7. Aditya Birla Intermediate College
  8. Grasim Bhiwani Textiles
  9. Rajashree Birla
  10. Ananya Birla
  11. Aryaman Birla
It also mistakenly adds Birla Corporation to its list. While related, it's not part of the ABG. Then there are all the brands that effectively come under subsidiaries of the AB group. These include Louis Philippe (brand), and so on. And frankly, this is just the tip of the iceberg. These are the subsidiaries of one of the subsidiaries of its subsidiary. IOW, this template can be improved upon.—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 19:25, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hhkohh (talk) 01:42, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:39, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 November 25. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:22, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 11:09, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary test template. No foreseeable transclusions. Jalen D. Folf (talk • contribs) 02:53, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I as the sole contributor to the template, I have requested it to be speedy deleted. thank you! Viztor (talk) 05:59, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 November 25. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:01, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:00, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Olympic event exists for this very reason. No reason to have a specific template for just this one event. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:03, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:13, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Olympic event exists for this very reason. No reason to have a specific template for just this one event. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:02, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).