User talk:Philblue7

Welcome!

Hello, Philblue7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Wii The Nintendo Channel.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Wii The Nintendo Channel.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of RiiConnect24

The article RiiConnect24 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references. Appears to be intended to be a pointer to a web site. No indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of RiiConnect24

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on RiiConnect24, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GILO A&E⇑ 18:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of RiiConnect24

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on RiiConnect24 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Smjg (talk) 13:37, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Arthur (season 2), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 16:59, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Cyberchase episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:38, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of The Powerpuff Girls episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:28, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm Damnedfan1234. I noticed that you made a change to an article, KidsClick, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Damnedfan1234 (talk) 13:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Damnedfan1234. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to KidsClick have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. An older uncited Wikipedia I.P. edit is not a source. Damnedfan1234 (talk) 16:39, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at KidsClick. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Damnedfan1234 (talk) 17:04, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

KidsClick

The WP:NOTTVGUIDE guideline makes it very clear that we don't give out times in articles for a block of programming. This will continue to be reverted, and I advise that you read it and WP:ADVERT to understand that we aren't tolerant to articles becoming no different from a press release from Sinclair. Nate • (chatter) 23:35, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello, I'm Philroc. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Wii Menu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Phil roc^{My contribs} 13:10, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Check Mii Out Channel, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Phil roc^{My contribs} 13:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of KidsClick Schedule Changes

The article KidsClick Schedule Changes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not the Radio Times

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. !dave 18:21, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of KidsClick Schedule Changes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KidsClick Schedule Changes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KidsClick Schedule Changes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. !dave 08:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with KidsClick Schedule Changes. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. !dave 18:28, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COI

Please read this policy, immediately. Any future additions which use Sinclair sources to source future programming will be removed from the KidsClick article. They own KidsClick. We don't use their sources because of that. Learn our neutrality policies or face a block. Nate • (chatter) 00:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Based on this restoration after my warning to you, this is your last warning. I removed it because it sources to a promotional story from the company behind the block. It will stay removed. If it's restored one more time, you are likely to be warned further or blocked temporarily for your persistence. Nate • (chatter) 00:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Your recent editing history at KidsClick shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Digifan23 (talk) 18:40, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

This is the only warning you will receive about ownership of articles, which you showed at KidsClick. The next time you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have been warned too many times; start to cooperate with fellow editors and take their notes to heart. Nate • (chatter) 20:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Philblue7. Nate • (chatter) 22:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond to the ANI thread in some way. In order to edit here, you need to talk about your edits. Nate • (chatter) 03:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at KidsClick, you may be blocked from editing. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:23, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Space Racers episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Wizard of Oz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at KidsClick. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:04, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at KidsClick, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. IanDBeacon (talk) 01:50, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Eddie is a Yeti

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Philblue7, thanks for creating Eddie is a Yeti!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:29, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie is a Yeti

Hi, I noticed that your new page Eddie is a Yeti is very short. You might want to consider expanding it, and adding more references. If you would like some help expanding it, try placing the {{help me}} tag on your talk page, followed with a brief explanation. People will come to your assistance soon. If you would like to ask me any questions, you can do so on talk page. -- Henry ^TALK 20:22, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on List of programs broadcast by PBS. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:04, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Nintendo Channel.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Nintendo Channel.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:06, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KidsClick

The tables are all sortable. Click the little arrow next to each column heading. You can have whatever order you want there, but in the end, we work on alphabetical order for tables by default to make things easier. Nate • (chatter) 19:00, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nintendo Channel.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nintendo Channel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your final warning

Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at KidsClick. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stop persisting on adding information that has proven untrue, or may in time. I'm about ready to ask for a disqualification of ToonBarn since they've proven to whiff too many times on schedule predictions here. And you've been warned more than once on the addition of old sources to this article. It's tiresome, and there are many more articles here which could use quality contributions. You aren't the only one allowed to edit this article, and removing helpful contributions has become a net negative to this article. Nate • (chatter) 23:43, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at ABC Kids (United States). Digifan23 (talk) 18:36, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at KidsClick. A screencap you took without any context is completely unacceptable as a source. Nate • (chatter) 19:09, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JC7V-constructive zone 20:16, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Continued abuse by User:Philblue7. Abequinn14 (talk) 02:16, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I have given you an indefinite block but the block can be lifted if you make a sincere commitment to full compliance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. You must also commit to communicating with your fellow editors when they raise legitimate concerns about your edits. You have a long history of using poor quality sources, edit warring and refusing to communicate. This behavior must change dramatically if you want to keep editing Wikipedia. This is your chance to change. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Philblue7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been blocked for engaging in edit wars, and for persistently making disruptive edits. Examples: Adding a non-reliable source. If someone reverts my edits back, I stick with it. I promise that I will change my behavior, I will no longer engage in edit wars, and I will no longer do disruptive editing. Philblue7 (talk) 12:33, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am sorry but I do not find your answer satisfactory. You are only providing vague answers, which does not help to convince me that you actually understand the reasons you were blocked and will change in the future. I am declining this request. You are free to make another request if you want to attempt to convince another administrator, but your answers will need to improve. 331dot (talk) 14:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please specifically address the other reasons you were blocked, as Cullen328 described them, and explain how exactly you will change. This is to ensure that you understand. Thanks 331dot (talk) 12:59, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What was disruptive about your editing and how will you change it? What will you do when someone reverts one of your edits instead of edit warring? You may respond below. 331dot (talk) 13:12, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Philblue7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I now understand why I was blocked. In the KidsClick article, I just wanted to add a source that Miraculous season 2 is debuting to U.S. TV., but Digifan23 reverted it, because it turned out to be an un-reliable source, in which Mrschimpf said Facebook is not a source, and I understood that. I created the separate RiiConnect24 article in case there was no info of the unoffical relaunch, but it was removed because there was already info in the WiiConnect24 article in the past. In the ABC Kids article few days ago, I added a grid with more info, but nobody cared about it anymore after 2011, and it caused an edit war to engage. And if nobody agrees with my edits and reverts them, I have to go with it. If I can get another chance, I promise I will acknowledge this, and change my behavior of editing in Wikipedia, including sticking with anyone's edits (not mine), not starting anymore edit wars, and not making anymore disruptive edits. All I wanted to say left is: I'm so sorry for my actions. Philblue7 (talk) 14:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

User is unresponsive to questions. Yamla (talk) 16:21, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment Yesterday? I didn't revert the above, that was Digifan23 (though I would have agreed with that, and also, you've been reverted on adding the block's Facebook PR as a source multiple times to begin with; you should have known not to add that a long time ago). I re-reverted the ToonBarn source because it completely whiffed on the schedule prediction, as I described above. You need to know what you're editing, and why your edits are being reverted (especially as I have told you multiple times that we sort things universally in alphabetical order, we have sortable tables, yet you insist on sorting by show airdate manually and complicating tables). I still am not seeing that. Nate • (chatter) 20:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For admin reference They changed and refactored their unblock reason after mine and Abequinn's comments to make us look like we were commenting on non-existent things; they added an apology, but no response to our concerns was addressed in the re-edits. Nate • (chatter) 19:44, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There is a lot more that you need to do. Your unnecessary additions of "RiiConnect24" in the WiiConnect24 article are not adequate. I even did an RfC to see if we needed it; we definitely did not, it was basically WP:PROMOTION.

The other thing is that the edits were long-term, i.e., you waited months before you added it again. First, you created the article "RiiConnect24" twice. Then another person created it again, after that, it was WP:SALTED. Then you added the mention of RiiConnect24 back into the WiiConnect24 article and it was almost immediately reverted per that RfC.

This came with multiple warnings in your talk page, with WiiConnect24 and edit wars. Will you acknowledge this? Abequinn14 (talk) 20:55, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation started

@Abequinn14: Judging from me just having to start a sockpuppet investigation about them involving 67.249.82.177 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), no acknowledgement will be done (of course, consider this notice to the user of such). Phil, respond and stick to this account, or you're going to find you won't be editing for a long time. Not the smartest thing to go back to editing about your most obvious topic areas (and it completely nullifies the apology above). Nate • (chatter) 05:09, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]