Jump to content

User talk:KarinCastle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:PhilandIva)

August 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Dreamcatchers (TV Series), from its old location at User:PhilandIva/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 06:04, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dreamcatchers (TV Series) (August 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Wikipedia shouldn't reference itself.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 06:05, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, PhilandIva! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 06:05, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dreamcatchers (TV Series) (October 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please add reviews of this series if possible.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:06, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Dreamcatchers (TV Series) concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dreamcatchers (TV Series), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dreamcatchers (TV Series) has been accepted

[edit]
Dreamcatchers (TV Series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits, you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zanimum (talk) 16:16, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Alexf(talk) 13:42, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

KarinCastle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

Hello, it seems I have been blocked for advertising or promoting. This was never my intention nor did I receive any remuneration or privileges from posting. I wanted only to update the entry with as much detailed information as possible, detailed information which was previously available without a problem and was later deleted by another user. I would be more than willing to make whatever modifications necessary to reverse the block and make the entry fit Wikipedia's guidelines. Appreciate your help in this matter, thank you. Hello, I believe there has been a mistake in blocking my account. I never posted any advertisement or promotional content, nor did I post any links that are to promotional content. I did not receive remuneration for the edits made and was only intending to provide detailed information about the entry. I am not very well versed in all of Wikipedia's guidelines and it was not my intention to break any of the rules. I will definitely be more careful when editing or creating entries in the future. I hope you will consider my request and appreciate your help in this matter. Best Regards.

Decline reason:

Your choice of new username would be acceptable. Regarding the block itself, there is no mistake, as you violated WP:COI and WP:PAID. You don't have to receive specific remuneration or payment for editing to be a paid editor; any paid relationship with the topic triggers the disclosure requirement. You don't have to be soliciting or selling something to be editing promotionally. Please review the policies described to you and tell us how your future edits will be consistent with those policies, and tell about any other topics you might edit about as a general contributor. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 17:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've merged your requests, as only a single open request is needed at a time. 331dot (talk) 17:51, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you. Is there anything else I need to do at this time?

Yes, please sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~) Matuko (talk) 18:36, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KarinCastle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi 331dot, I'm sorry but I'm not sure if this is the correct way to reply to you as my username is still blocked. I appreciate you reviewing my request and providing links so that I can better understand the terms that I violated. I will strive to make all future edits the most neutral and objective possible, consistent with Wikipedia guidelines outlined in the policies references. As a general contributor I look forward to collaborating on future edits related to audiovisual production in southeast asia. I look forward to your reply.

Decline reason:

One unblock open at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:29, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

KarinCastle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

Would like to proceed with the approved new username if possible please

Decline reason:

This does not fully address WP:COI and WP:PROMO. Yamla (talk) 11:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

KarinCastle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

Hello, it seems I have been blocked for advertising or promoting. This was never my intention nor did I receive any remuneration or privileges from posting. I wanted only to update the entry with as much detailed information as possible, detailed information which was previously available without a problem and was later deleted by another user. I would be more than willing to make whatever modifications necessary to reverse the block and make the entry fit Wikipedia's guidelines. Appreciate your help in this matter, thank you. Hello, I believe there has been a mistake in blocking my account. I never posted any advertisement or promotional content, nor did I post any links that are to promotional content. I did not receive remuneration for the edits made and was only intending to provide detailed information about the entry. I am not very well versed in all of Wikipedia's guidelines and it was not my intention to break any of the rules. I will definitely be more careful when editing or creating entries in the future. I hope you will consider my request and appreciate your help in this matter. Best Regards. 2001:861:3F41:3AE0:AD91:6928:72ED:34E7 (talk) 15:26, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only; please make your request while logged in to your account. 331dot (talk) 08:55, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KarinCastle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, sorry for the repeat requests - I am still learning how to properly use Wikipedia and its tools. It seems I have been blocked for advertising or promoting. This was never my intention nor did I receive any remuneration or privileges from posting. I wanted only to update the entry with as much detailed information as possible, detailed information which was previously available without a problem and was later deleted by another user. I never posted any advertisement or promotional content, nor did I post any links that are to promotional content. I did not receive remuneration for the edits made and was only intending to provide detailed information about the entry. I am not very well versed in all of Wikipedia's guidelines and it was not my intention to break any of the rules. I will definitely be more careful when editing or creating entries in the future. I hope you will consider my request and appreciate your help in this matter. Best Regards.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:10, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KarinCastle&oldid=1080775691"