User talk:Phil Villalobos

WP:AfC

Do to concerns of paid editing going through AfC is required. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COI

You need to read and follow. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:35, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pasting

When you copy and paste work from elsewhere you need to say were. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:40, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jimmysonoma/Archive

Concerns of you being a sock. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:42, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Draft talk:Paul Harrop has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Draft talk:Paul Harrop was changed by Phil Villalobos (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958747 on 2019-06-11T16:51:38+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:51, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Harrop (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Assorted blogs are of no use for establishing notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paul Harrop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paul Harrop, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:54, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Phil Villalobos! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:54, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]