User talk:Phgao/Archive2
Ronnotel's RfA
[edit]I'm limiting thank you spam to just those contributors who made an extra effort on my behalf. I am truly grateful for your support and I hope to live up to your expectations. Ronnotel 13:25, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 24th, 2007.
[edit]
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 39 | 24 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |||||||||||||
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST | ||||||||||||
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
RfA thanks
[edit]Thanks for supporting my successful RfA, which closed at 63 supports and 1 opposed. I appreciate it and hope to do my best. I especially want to thank Shalom for the nomination, DGG for the encouragement, and Jokestress for welcoming me. Bearian 13:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 05:31, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Anti-vandalism barnstar
[edit]The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
I've seen you patrolling recent changes a lot lately, and beating me to lots of reverts. Great job! RainbowOfLight Talk 07:47, 24 September 2007 (UTC) |
You're welcome! RainbowOfLight Talk 19:01, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
I deleted this page today on two grounds:
- Per CSD G12, it was a direct copy of [1];
- Per CSD A7, no assertion of notability. In general, primary schools unless absolutely exceptional do not meet the bar for notability. Orderinchaos 04:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Sure thing, thanks for letting me know. Phgao 15:52, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Leukduck.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Leukduck.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ok problem solved. Phgao 15:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Angelo's Civita Farnese
[edit]I guess you missed the Edit Summary that said "in progress". Please give the next article more than two minutes before prodding it.--SarekOfVulcan 16:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]I need to engage brain before typing.--Appraiser 19:27, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of The Age of Atlantic
[edit]If you're still around, you might want to take a look at what's happened with this page. Unbelievable. --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 20:59, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia has a new administrator!
[edit]
Teddy
[edit]Gosh. How embarrassing! --Dweller 08:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Hiya Phgao. I've declined a speedy on the above - assertion of importance comes from the alleged philanthropy and being in the Forbes list. You're very welcome to take it to WP:AFD however. Best. Pedro : Chat 10:18, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- It was borderline, but there was enough there for it to fail CSD. Thanks for the comment about my boy!!! Pedro : Chat 10:29, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Help fix this problem
[edit]Hello! I hope you are feeling fine. I would like you to view this comment which I made. I hope you can fix this problem which I cannot seem to comprehend. Thanks! --Siva1979Talk to me 18:59, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Speedy Deletion of Cora Crane
[edit]I added {{hangon}} to this page because I think the subject matter may be notable, if the article is fleshed out, sourced, and wikified. Perhaps it should be merged to Stephen Crane, but that's another discussion. -- Tckma 19:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Not quite sure what happened there
[edit]I must have submitted the prod as you redirected the page. Don't know why it sent it to you though. Sorry 'bout that. ARendedWinter 19:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion
[edit]Regarding the article OLM(Our Lady of Mercy School), which you tagged for speedy deletion with the reason "This article or other page provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. It is patent nonsense", I wanted you to know that I have removed the speedy deletion tag. This article does not qualify for speedy deletion because it is in a foreign language, which is not nonsense. If you still want the article to be deleted, please use the WP:AFD process. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 20:12, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes I agree that of course it is not nonsense, i realised it was in another lanugage, but wasnt sure what to tag it, in fact I asked Pedro [2] what to do in those situations before you commented on my user page, and he said A2, but I dont think A2 is suitable for these cases as no one knows whether there is a corresponding article on the foreign language wikipedia. But I PRODed it anyway. Phgao 20:21, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- The correct tag is {{notenglish|language it is in}}. Thanks. Stifle (talk) 20:22, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ok thanks, that should be put into Twinkle as another option. Phgao 20:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- I don't have/use Twinkle but you're welcome to suggest it to whomever/whatever maintains it. Stifle (talk) 20:49, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ok thanks, that should be put into Twinkle as another option. Phgao 20:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- The correct tag is {{notenglish|language it is in}}. Thanks. Stifle (talk) 20:22, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Non english articles
[edit]WP:CSD#A2 my friend! "Foreign language articles that exist on another Wikimedia project. If the article does not exist on another project, use the template {{notenglish}} instead, and list the page at Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English for review and possible translation". How you determine it is on another wiki can be more tricky. I've only ever had one once that I found was a mirror of the ru. wiki. Best bet to be honest is either tag not english or just userfy it. Hope that helps Pedro : Chat 20:14, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- In general play it safe. I see the article you highlighted turned out to be nonsense on transaltion and was speedied under A7. What you can do is take, say, the first eight words and cut and paste them into google. If you get an exact hit on another wikipedia then you know where it's going (and can add a comment to the talk page). Generally if it's not English and you can't translate it just use the not english tag and hope someone multilingual turns up! Pedro : Chat 07:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 03, 2007
[edit]
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 40 | 1 October 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |||||||||||||
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST | ||||||||||||
|
Thanks! :D
[edit]Thanks Phgao/Archive2 | |
I would like to thank you for your participation in my successful RfA, which passed with a tally of (44/10/5)[1]. Whether you supported, opposed or were neutral in my RfA, I appreciate your participation and I hope that we can continue to work together to build a stronger and better Wikipedia. | |
Regards, nattang 04:36, 3 October 2007 (UTC) |
Question re: Cluebot
[edit]I'm not sure what TB2 is, but yes it is for bot reporting. As for why Cluebot doesn't report I think it's not built to do that, or may not have permissions. You could ask at User talk:Cobi as he's the bot's owner. Pedro : Chat 11:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- You're allways welcome. If I can help I always will. Pedro : Chat 11:41, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Hmmm. I'd just use A7. I suppose my rationale is this. If it's the kind of thing you'd see in a sandbox then it's proably a test page. If it mentions a name then I'd stick with A7. I don't think anyone will shout at you on that though, provided the article clearly should be speedied. It's gone now BTW - I've deleted it. Pedro : Chat 11:53, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes I bet they do get deleted faster. Here's why. At CAT:CSD you can view pages nominated for speedy deletion by cattegory - e.g. attack, nonsense, notability etc etc. Hitting the delete button on empty articles, attack pages and tests is dead dead easy - I could kill three a minute with just prefunctuory checks. But an A7 notability can be a lot harder - more posibility of something in the history (whch you have to check on every article before deleting), posibility of links to the page, the page may be a longer article and needs reading etc etc etc. I suspect some admins breeze over, look at all the G1 or G2's and knock them on the head, then start ploughing through the hard work. That's why you see anything under G1, A1, A3, G10, G3 and A2 all go fast, whereas other stuff can last for ages. To be honest I always check for G10's before doing anything else, to make sure we get attack pages cleared out fast. Hope that helps Pedro : Chat 12:04, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- This page is a part of the {{todo}}. Absolon S. Kent 01:38, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- I had a look, "Normally, the "/to do" subpage should only be created under the article's Talk page, unless it is a notice board or project page.", the to do page I dont think should be an article page, but a subpage on the talk page. Thanks. Phgao 01:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Welcome template
[edit]Did you know you are missing a </div> from the bottom of the welcome template you use? This draws all subsequent messages with the same style. Intentional? - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 02:43, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I think the closing tag at the bottom should do it. Thank you. - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 02:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Perfect! It looks great and works too. :) - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 02:47, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
User:Wierdoface
[edit]Besides missing a </div> on your welcome message, you are welcoming vandals without reverting their vandalism, example User talk:Wierdoface two edits both vandalism. Jeepday (talk) 02:52, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, a user just told me about that tag, and I added it to my template. Also, please note that I cannot determine if a user will vandalise a page after I give them a friendly greeting, as that user if you see the time stamps vandalised after the welcome. I find that welcoming users greatly reduces vandalism. Thank for the heads up with the div tag as well! Oh and on my user page, I like the box around :) Phgao 02:55, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Oooh! Shiny!
[edit]Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
For welcoming so many users! Good work! Tiptoety 03:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC) |
- You are very welcome, huh...that is interesting, i will have to take a minute to read it in detail. Thank you, i appreciate the positive feed back! Cheers! Tiptoety 03:55, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
User page copy-cat
[edit]Sorry I missed ya, I took a little break from the action. Looks like everything worked out well...but let me know if there are problems and I'll take a look. Due to the licensing nature of Wikipedia we don't own the content of our user pages, but it's considered a nice gesture to give credit to the designer! Dreadstar † 04:30, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- lol..! Drop by anytime, I'm always happy to help! Yeah, I saw that the user had removed references to your username and pages, [3], [4] - which would have been just a tiny bit awkward if left in place..;). I scanned through the rest of the page and didn't find your name anywhere...and I see you left a nice welcome note..! Nice to meet you, again! Dreadstar † 04:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ach, of course, I knew I recognized your name from somewhere...lol...my mind is going...it's been a stressful couple of weeks since then...forgive my lapse in memory! I remember thanking you for your vote in my RfA..! Hey, anytime I can help, I'm here for ya! And thanks for the great compliment! Dreadstar † 04:49, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- That's it! You found it! That's exactly where my memory went, right into the black hole of the infinitely mass mailing....oh, yes, that was a very funny conversation...I look forward to more of those.. Now the pressure's on...hmmm...think of something funny...quick...um...The plumage don't enter into it - it's stone dead....;) Dreadstar † 05:09, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ach, of course, I knew I recognized your name from somewhere...lol...my mind is going...it's been a stressful couple of weeks since then...forgive my lapse in memory! I remember thanking you for your vote in my RfA..! Hey, anytime I can help, I'm here for ya! And thanks for the great compliment! Dreadstar † 04:49, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]Thank you welcomed me. Deer123tom 14:07, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Trying do delete More than Hagnesta Hill ??!
[edit]I deleted your vile wrong and rude post of deleting the More than Hagnesta Hill Kent single CD article. You requested deletion for it only a few minutes after I made the article, while I was in the process of expanding it. It is acessable from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_%28band%29#Singles_in_English I have made about 30 Kent CD single articles this way, with almost no information at first, and then I added more information to expand the articles. If you have a problem with this then I am so sorry, and frankly I don't care, as I am a fan of this band who is expanding Wikipedia's information about the band. I don't have the time to do it all at once so I do step by step, improving all the single articles by Kent. But I must thank you for not putting that dumb deletion request on the other articles that I wrote. It is one thing if a newbie creats an article and just leaves it there, but that is why you should look into who made the articles - if you looked at my profile you would be able to find out that I regularly update all the Kent CD single pages by adding more info on all of them. Some people don't put everything there is about the CD all at once, sorry! Sorry if this is a rude post, but what you did is a rude thing. (LAz17 00:14, 6 October 2007 (UTC)).
- Please AGF and remain civil, please realise that tagging New Pages occurs right after they are created, so of course I tagged it a few mins after you made the article. You can add a tag, saying the article is in the process of being written and that usually prevents any tagging. Also the hangon tag can be used to allow an admin to further scrutinise the article. Furthermore, if you wish to avoid this happening again, you can do draft versions in your sandbox and submit a more complete version. Phgao 00:19, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- I added the hang on and I also finished adding info on the CD single. I have no idea what draft versions are. I just edit articles until they are okay. (LAz17 00:27, 6 October 2007 (UTC)).
- For example you can create pages like [5] which you can add whatever you like (up to a point), and create "draft" articles there. Phgao 00:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- I added the hang on and I also finished adding info on the CD single. I have no idea what draft versions are. I just edit articles until they are okay. (LAz17 00:27, 6 October 2007 (UTC)).
- Please AGF and remain civil, please realise that tagging New Pages occurs right after they are created, so of course I tagged it a few mins after you made the article. You can add a tag, saying the article is in the process of being written and that usually prevents any tagging. Also the hangon tag can be used to allow an admin to further scrutinise the article. Furthermore, if you wish to avoid this happening again, you can do draft versions in your sandbox and submit a more complete version. Phgao 00:19, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
World Record Club
[edit]It is a bit harsh that you have labelled this, an article I was just beginning to create, for deletion literally at the instant that I was creating it. I don't see that you could even have had time to read what I have written before it was labelled as I had just spent about an hour writing the bit that I did, saved it, and hey presto up for deletion. Give me a chance! I haven't even wikified it or anything yet and there is much more to be done with it. Please see the talk page for justification. Sedgefoot 01:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Have advised editor on his talk page. Shouldn't you be studying? --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 02:29, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for the Barnstar. Nice to know I'm getting something right! --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 18:23, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Have advised editor on his talk page. Shouldn't you be studying? --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 02:29, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
RE:hello
[edit]Thanks. I did it for fun at first, but I retain the habit in order to enable me to identify easily new creations in my contribs history. Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 01:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- You are leaving Wikipedia? Um, well ok it is easier, but would you consider changing it to reflect more on the article, ie change it to church, as when I see hello, I think vandalism/ test page. This would help those patrolling new pages. Thanks. Phgao 01:42, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Passwords
[edit]Nah, admins can't reset other user's passwords, and AFAIK bureacrats can't either. Probably the only ones that can are the software developers. In the case you refer to, its a complicated story. The user was blocked for disruptive editing, he then created a sockpuppet which also edited disruptively (which I indef-blocked as a sockpuppet at the same time as extending the 1st users block for sockpuppetry for block avoidance). He then created a 2nd sockpuppet which posted the password of the original user on its user page. I tested the user name and password and it logged on which proved this 3rd user was a geniune sockpuppet). So while I was logged on, I changed his password using the normal facility in preferences. I'm half expecting to see him again. —Moondyne 02:02, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- PS, nice to meet you too! —Moondyne 02:04, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]Thanks for the compliment! --Niceguyedc Go Huskies! 07:34, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
my user page
[edit]Hi,
Can u help me out in designing my user page?
--Cj.samson 08:23, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
u can do :)
[edit]Hi ,
Just give me basic inputs , so that i can develope, you can add that box in my pages, if i copy those code from ur page any irrelevant data will be copied???
--Cj.samson 08:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks a lot Phgao, my page looks really cool now, I'm from india and i love photography, music and reading. Help me out to contribute more to wikipedia. Share your ideas and views. regs, --Cj.samson 09:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Im from Tamil nadu South India, i speak English, tamil and hindi. I have a higher resolution of that image , can i upload them?? wont that be a problem?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cj.samson (talk • contribs) 09:48, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Phgao —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cj.samson (talk • contribs) 10:05, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Ok sure i'll do that, currently for which project are you working???
--Cj.samson 10:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
NASCAR Fan24's Secret Page
[edit]The Secret Page Detective Award | ||
This user has found NASCAR Fan24's hidden page! Congratulations! |
NASCAR Fan24(radio me!) 11:12, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
User page deleted
[edit]I've just deleted your user page. Let me know if you ever want the history restored for some reason. Just for future reference, you can request speedy deletion of your user page or user subpages by tagging them with the template {{db-userreq}}. — TKD::Talk 11:15, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Featured Picture
[edit]Hi, I have uploaded a file with higher resolution, kindly check it. Is there any chance of becoming featured picture??? Pls suggest some pages to which this image can be added. --Cj.samson 11:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Regarding West Ashley High School
[edit]I've removed the PROD you placed as the school is clearly quite notable as shown in aquick search on the Internet. Not many schools get visited by the President of the United States and the fact that he visited the school makes it quite notable. Hopefully removing the PROD is okay with you and if you don't agree with it, you can take it up at WP:AFD. Thanks and happy editing! --Hdt83 Chat 00:58, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
It is indeed admin only. Basically it's a list of all articles that are on no-ones watchlist. This means they are more suceptible to sneaky vanmdalism as no-one is watching them. It's limited to admins to make sure that vandals can't see the list and therefore vandalise unwatched articles. It's a useful(ish) tool if you want to vandal fight basically. But it's a long, long list! I wouldn't be concerned about your neutral. You were indepth with your rationale and reasoning, and RfA is note a vote, allegedly. It's a discussion and you discussed which is what it's about. Pedro : Chat 08:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Blocked users editing
[edit]Blocked users can still edit their talk pages, in order that they can ask for block reviews. They can also send e-mails via the media wiki software, assuming that the blocking admin didn't disable that feature (the default is to alow them to send emails).
Yeah, I protected my sock account for 10 years - It's just in case this account was ever compromised I can still log in and prove it's me! Pedro : Chat 09:17, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
suitable tags
[edit]Thanks a lot for adding my image in the Snail page, I'm not sure what type of snail it is,How did u add those small boxes Tamil and Hindi,when i said i'm from India, how do you know the suitable tags for a particular thing for example if i'm interested in slow rock , how can i add those box in my page? how to know the appropriate tags?? --Cj.samson 12:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Appreciation
[edit]Hello Phgao,
Thank you for the compliment/commendation on the outcome of my RfA. Based on your note left at my talk page (and my disdain for spam), I decided to send you this original note -- instead of the boilerplate "ZOMG! thank-u! thank-u!! thank-u!!!" material.
To that end, I will keep this short: feel free to contact me if you need help with any on-wiki actions requiring administrative access. This includes page moves [over redirects], have deleted content moved to your user space [for improvement], and the like. I will be happy to assist you as best I can.
Thanks again for taking the time to participate in my RfA; I really appreciate the support you provided. Cheers, --Aarktica 23:42, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey, man. I believe in having well written articles on Wikipedia, but I didn't have the article out there for ten seconds before you nominated it for deletion. My edit summary when I saved it said that it was not the final product and to give me time. Ten seconds is not time enough for me to get it perfected. WP:DP actually states to improve or tag it, rather than nominate it for deletion. Please give users time to perfect their article before you nominated for deletion. Thanks Gdk411 00:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hello, that is why I prodded it (not that schools can be CSDed anyway), but as it is a PROD, anyone can remove it. I have since sent it to AfD. Phgao 13:00, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
tags for user box
[edit]Hi Phgao,
I edited my page and added one userbox related to Tamilnadu project, but where to find the userboxes or the tag, for example userbox tags related to music, photography , wildlife etc.
--Cj.samson 12:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Hi, Thanks for the link, got good collection of user boxes. I added heading for my previous message in your talk page.
--Cj.samson 12:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Requests for adminship
[edit]I wanted to just drop you a line and thank you for taking the time to peruse my self nom for adminship, despite that you opposed. You had a solid reason for doing so - and yes that was one of my initial concerns when making the decision. I hope to work on this in the near future to have a more balanced or seasoned wiki record. Cheers! Wisdom89 14:08, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Tjaja
[edit]Hmmm....die Wiki-Welt ist klein..... Lectonar 15:08, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- da wir in der EN-wiki sind: you can say you to me (wir können uns Duzen). Lectonar 15:12, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keine Ahnung, ich mag die DE-wiki nicht, aber Sie/Du Haben/hast mich hier gesiezt (und im Englischen macht es keinen Unterschied.) ;-)). Lectonar 15:23, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Re:Having fun?
[edit]Haha, yes. How did you find all these broken redirects? Nishkid64 (talk) 15:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]for the *. :) NawlinWiki 18:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Quality images candidates
[edit]Hi,
How can i add my image to quality image candidate list? --Cj.samson 13:16, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
FP
[edit]Once the picture has been nominated as FP, then is there any chances for that image to come picture of the day?? --Cj.samson 13:39, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks a lot for the info, how do you contribute to wikipedia article according to your own interest or by someone's guidance??, how do u choose articles? --Cj.samson 13:45, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
tanx
[edit]Surely i'll ask for your help in the days to come, how many hours do you spend for wikipedia?? Am i asking too many questions?? :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cj.samson (talk • contribs) 14:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Admin
[edit]Hi, thanks for asking, but I already am an admin, I just don't use the admin powers very much. Cheers, AxelBoldt 16:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Concerning Rome High School
[edit]Hi, Phgao. I know the Rome High School is not very good yet, but please give me time. I've set up interviews with coaches and the principal about the school's history. Articles take time. I also want to know what you mean by "a non-notable school." I understand why you want to delete it, but consider trying to save it before brining it and its author down. Thank you. Gdk411 16:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up, Phgao! Even tho my contributions were limited, I've added a few references that may help, and I wouldn't mind allowing the creator more time to add further content. Dreadstar † 18:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Wow! Very cool! You are an excellent, thoughtful editor. I admire what you did..and I noticed you didn't have the original one of these:
The Original Barnstar | ||
For Heroically Editing with Good Faith in both nominating and voting against said nomination post-improvement to the deletion nominee!! Dreadstar † 04:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC) |
re: meetups
[edit]Please do come! This last one was unusually structured and to-the-point. Most will not be like that. At past meetups lots of us have been students. It is fun to meet some of the people you edit alongside, even if you feel like you have nothing special to contribute. If nothing else you get to enjoy the fact that you can make a wiki joke and people will not only understand it, but they'll laugh. ;) --pfctdayelise (talk) 11:44, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Having a quiet place to talk was part of the reason I chose the library. (There's nothing I hate more than when you're talking to someone interesting but can't even hear them in a bar or restaurant! argh.) The next one will either be a library or another quiet place. But afterwards if there are a few people who don't have to rush off they usually go to a nearby cafe or restaurant for a bite to eat or a drink. --pfctdayelise (talk) 14:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- I think someone should create it. How about you? :)
- I'm certainly planning to go to the tennis. I will probably discuss it with my boss closer to the date and maybe even take a couple of days off to go. I love it :) --pfctdayelise (talk) 12:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'm a computational linguist for a machine translation company, but I've only been doing it for around four months so it still feels weird to say that. :) Before that I was a uni student. --pfctdayelise (talk) 13:02, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'm working on Tagalog. At uni I studied a BA/BSc with some linguistics and computer science, although not a full major in either of them. --pfctdayelise (talk) 14:00, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
RFA Thank You Note from Jehochman
[edit]Ready to swab the deck! | ||
Another motley scallawag has joined the crew. Thanks for your comments at my RFA. Arrrgh! - - Jehochman Talk 00:45, 12 October 2007 (UTC) |
My recent RfA
[edit]Thank you for supporting my RfA, which unfortunately didn't succeed. The majority of the opposes stated that I needed more experience in the main namespace and Wikipedia namespace, so that is what I will do. I will go for another RfA in two month's time and I hope you will be able to support me then as well. If you have any other comments for me or wish to be notified when I go for another RfA, please leave them on my talk page. If you wish to nominate me for my next RfA, please wait until it has been two months. Thanks again for participating in my RfA! -- Cobi(t|c|b|cn) 01:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi mate. I notice your comment on the above. I've made a suggestion there - ask the candidate directly the circumstances of the block and how he feel about it. I'm impressed. I forgot to check the block log. Well done on your throughness. Pedro : Chat 13:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Spot on question. Whilst civility and good faith are imperative the whole point of RfA is that it is a discussion. By directly addressing an issue of concern through a question that candidate has the option to either assuage your worries or indeed confirm there is an issue. And that can only be helpful to everyone. Nice One. Pedro : Chat 14:15, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Technically it's in breach of policy. See WP:UN and detailed items under part 4. Post Jan 1 2007 accounts should not be emails. I'm not going to block yet. Try advising the editor that they should get a new account, and see what the outcome is. It might be worth mentioning that their name could be blocked at any time and they'd loose their edit history on that account. Remember to be very nice about it - though I'm sure you will be! Pedro : Chat 14:33, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Saw it. Spot on. Give me the heads up if you hear anything and I'll indef block. Pedro : Chat 14:40, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- EEEEEEEKKKKK! [6] The account is ancient (that's why it's on Google.) I thought there could be no way if the account was created today. Therefore user name as e-mail is okay. Better remove that note !! Pedro : Chat 14:44, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Cleaned up the worst offenders & left a note (I hope not too bitey) on his talk page. I feel like I've kicked a puppy given the amount of work that's gone into these — although I guess it serves as a small-scale trial run for the carpet-bombing deletion campaign that's likely to come out of this incident. — iridescent (talk to me!) 15:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
RFA
[edit]Hey Phgao - just to give you the heads up i just reverted you on my RFA page. I tried purging the page, and I still only see 5 neutral votes - but if you're sure it's 7 obviously feel free to revert my revert. thanks! --danielfolsom 16:30, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
RfA thanks
[edit]With thanks! | ||
Thanks for participating in my RfA, which closed successfuly. I leave you with a picture of the real Blood Red Sandman! Note his 'mop' is slightly deadlier than mine! - - Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 18:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC) |
RE:Yay
[edit]Thanks. And now only three more until I finish Ross! Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 02:41, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Say WHAT?
[edit]I just finished that article and you're nominating it for a freaking AfD? I'm trying to remain civil here, but it isn't easy. That store was a major part of my area's local history. - PMDrive1061 02:42, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- Never mind. I've blanked the article. This is precisely the type of idiocy that drove me off this site in the first place. Enjoy your site. I'm out of here. - PMDrive1061 02:45, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- It's not my site, Wikipedia is a collaboration and a community of like mined people who aim to create a place where knowledge is free. Phgao 05:20, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
I've given you my opinion. Take care and have a nice weekend. - PMDrive1061 02:46, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes I realise you are angry, and I too have read your "article" on your previous Wikipedia experience, but that is why I send it to AfD to get the views of other editors. Something that is notable for me in my area, does not entail it has worldwide notability, or I may think something is notable, but the overwhelming majority may not think that. But you are free to offer your views on the AfD page. Thanks! Phgao 02:45, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- (didn't get to send this as retired tag was up) Alright, I hate to see a good editor go, but it is wise not to use Wikipedia to make a point and leave, however it is entirely your own decision. Phgao 02:50, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- Here is the AfD in question. Phgao 05:09, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
That member page was not a test.
[edit]This page was not a test. I would appreciate it if I could remove the tag. Best,--Gp75motorsports 02:49, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hello, sorry but I believe those pages usually do not go in the Mainspace and are usually part of Wikipedia space. Hence, I think you can add it to the W. Project it is related to as a subpage. Hope that helps! Phgao 02:51, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Right, thanks.
[edit]It does and I will. Thanks for helping! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gp75motorsports (talk • contribs) 02:54, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- Glad I could help. Phgao 05:09, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
UAA question
[edit]I think you're right; Jewmaker011 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) could definitely be construed as an offensive username, especially with the article he created (Jewbling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)). I'd bring that account up at WP:UAA, to see if any other admins have any other opinions. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 03:44, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Hellsyeah
[edit]I find the incessant badgering about reform to be nothing but talk at the end. I blame it for the server slowdowns. bibliomaniac15 05:39, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Calmed down somewhat...
[edit]...but I am still stung by the comments regarding this AfD issue. I've always made it a point to check with experienced editors before making such a drastic move and I wish you had done the same. That's all I'd ask in the future. Thanks. --PMDrive1061 05:49, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- Good to hear. That is the exact reason that I sent it to AfD; because I wanted to hear the view of other editors. Phgao 05:51, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. I know you meant well. --PMDrive1061 05:53, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- No prob. I didn't. I did offer a theory as to why these sorts of things happen. Much easier to do when one's adrenal system isn't on hyperdrive. --PMDrive1061 06:04, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
PMDrive1061 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks
[edit]Just like to thank you for giving me the heads up on Eddie Hart being nominated for speedy deletion. Considering the nominater didn't even inform me the article could easily have been deleted without me even knowing. Cheers Crickettragic 07:04, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Assuming good faith...
[edit]I guess that the whole editing earlier and nominating an article for speedy deletion was not exactly the best way to meet you. Sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused you or if I offended you in any way. I have no enemies on wikipedi, and I just wanted to make sure that I didn't make one.
I like your user page. I spent hours looking for user pages to kind of base mine off of and I think I will take some concepts from yours and apply them to mine, if you don't mind. I like the scheme on your main page. It looks nice. --Μ79_Šp€çíá∫횆tell me about it 08:18, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
RfA
[edit]Thank you for your help on my RfA even though it's not going as I would have hoped. My question is on my stats page or the talk page, what's the easiest way to update my stats? Thank you. Carter | Talk to me 08:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't quite understand your directions for withdrawing my nomination as I had already planned on doing. I will of course continue editing, and profusely. thanks for your guidance, and your help in withdrawing my nomination. Carter | Talk to me 09:04, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for that! You're awesome, and I expect to do a lot of editing in the next few months. Keep an eye out for my next nomination! Thanks again! Carter | Talk to me 09:49, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk page
[edit]The talk page is still there. Just enter Lodewijk van Beethoven in the search box, press "go", then you will be redirected to the Van Beethoven family page. At the top it will say "(Redirected from Lodewijk van Beethoven)". Press the blue link and you'll get to the redirect page where you can access the talk page. Cheers. --Folantin 16:10, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- Another plan: If you like we can restore the Lodewijk_van_Beethoven page for the time being just so people can access the talk page with greater ease. Of course, we'll still keep all the merged material on the Van Beethoven family page. After a few days, the Lodewijk page can be turned into a redirect again.--Folantin 16:15, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the offer
[edit]I appreciate the gesture of wanting to leave a welcome. Thanks. I guess I've been here long enough that I don't really need one. :) Thanks again. --PMDrive1061 05:06, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Slow Down
[edit]Your nominations are malformed somehow; "this article's entry" doesn't show up. And high schools are usually notable. SolidPlaid 06:01, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know to fix it, but when I look at one of the pages you nominated, say Holder Elementary School, the this article's entry link appears red. SolidPlaid 06:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- As for the high school, I'm sure it has some sources somewhere. SolidPlaid 06:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I don't know what you are referring to. Can I get some links please. Also high schools are and can be AfDed if they dont demonstrate notability. Phgao 06:03, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes I need some links, but I am using TW so it could be some problem with the script. Phgao 06:04, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm strange but I fixed it. Seems due to the "_" in the empty spaces. Also it is true there might be sources, but they have to say that the school is notable or famous so to say somewhere, I am not debating whether the school exists or not. See ya! Phgao 06:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- I might add; thanks for letting me know about the red link! Phgao 06:13, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm strange but I fixed it. Seems due to the "_" in the empty spaces. Also it is true there might be sources, but they have to say that the school is notable or famous so to say somewhere, I am not debating whether the school exists or not. See ya! Phgao 06:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes I need some links, but I am using TW so it could be some problem with the script. Phgao 06:04, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Monster log-jam
[edit]Looks redundant. From what I see the main article is quite sufficient for the subject, and the spin-offs should probably be SD'd. I see you posted a query on his page...which is what I was going to suggest doing...most excellent..;) Dreadstar † 06:34, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Silly me...redirect them to Monster Jam World Finals. No need to speedy. Dreadstar † 06:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- I sorta started already... :D Dreadstar † 06:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Be sure to leave a note on the user's page so they know what happened...no surprises... Dreadstar † 06:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Redirects act funny sometimes with too many odd characters, this is what I changed it to. Dreadstar † 06:52, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- No worries, I felt the same thing when I did the same exact thing a long time ago...<sigh>...learning through pain. heh.. Dreadstar † 06:53, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Redirects act funny sometimes with too many odd characters, this is what I changed it to. Dreadstar † 06:52, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Be sure to leave a note on the user's page so they know what happened...no surprises... Dreadstar † 06:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- I sorta started already... :D Dreadstar † 06:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
LOL!
[edit]Way too funny: Deadstar! I'm actually laughing out loud...the word it was linked to...oh..my..god...that's fabulous! I can't even think of anything to match that one...very good. And thanks for the barnstar, a very welcome compliment..!
At least you didn't link to my Dark Side opposite and archenemy...Parody Master, Deedstar.
Dreadstar † 07:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Wow. That is quite an incredible coincidence! Finding Deadstar is pretty amazing...most wouldn't have gotten past Dreadstar or his cohorts. That is fantastic, man..really made my day! Dreadstar † 07:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Speaking of coincidences, you gave me the working man's barnstar, all the way from the land down under... now that's getting creepy, dude... Dreadstar † 07:44, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
problem
[edit]{{helpme}} I think i just created a new article that has copyright violations. I didn't do it intentionally its just that i quoted too many words. I don't want to get in trouble for this so please delete it. User:Sleepyportugee 22:43, 14 October 2007
The Editor's Barnstar
[edit]The Editor's Barnstar | ||
I noticed that your edits were impressive and so I've decided to award you this Editor's Barnstar! Wikidudeman (talk) 06:03, 15 October 2007 (UTC) |
BB
[edit]A new editor, so I'd WP:AGF and try to guide the user along. Keep me apprised of the situation if you do..I'll watchlist the page and try to help too. But later...it's almost 4am here and yon pillow doth beckon mine sleepy head... Dreadstar † 07:48, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- Cool. I left a welcome message on BB's talk page so BB would have some handy links to our policies and where to get help. If you want to leave an offer of assistance there too, it might be nice. I'm going out of town for a few days, so my activities will be slightly reduced.. G'night! Dreadstar † 07:52, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- Work, but should be a fun trip to the Big Apple. Note how I have resisted the siren call of my pillow....;) Dreadstar † 08:01, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
3RR reports
[edit]Just so you know, if you don't leave diffs your report won't be actioned. Spartaz Humbug! 08:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks - I did notice you had withdrawn the report. I just thought you might like to know for next time. Spartaz Humbug! 08:17, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- Basically go with whatever works best. If AIV is simpler then use that. 3RR reports need to be compiled properly by the reporter otherwise the burden always falls on the admin. We need time to consider the whole issue and took at everyone in the articles histiry. I have popups installed which means I can confirm the violation in seconds rather then minutes simply by hovering my cursor over the diffs. This makes it possible to just pop by and consider a report rather than having to have at least 30 minutes spare to do the research and look at everything. Spartaz Humbug! 08:30, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I know.
[edit]I noticed my own mistakes, thank you. That's why I tagged the redirect. TheBlazikenMaster 10:11, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Ad. cite?
[edit]Not agreeing with your assessment on this page: [7]. I know it's an MSN groups page, but there's still some useful content on there. —Rob (talk) 20:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Dear Phgao,
Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.
Jmlk17 09:09, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 15th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 42 | 15 October 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:00, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Phébus
[edit]Hi sir,
I modified the text
Best regards
Brigitte —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brigitte descartes (talk • contribs) 14:34, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
R1 taggings
[edit]Hi, I noticed that you tagged a bunch of broken redirects for deletion. I'm not sure if you're aware, but we now have a bot, RedirectCleanupBot, with the ability to automatically delete broken redirects with only one revision in the history, saving us admins a bunch of mindless work. Since it will not delete any page with more than one revision (lest a good page be deleted by being turned into a broken redirect), your tagging forces the deletions to be done by hand. In the future, please tag only pages with more than one revision in the history with the {{db-r1}} or {{db-redirnone}} tags - the bot is much more efficient. :) Thanks, and don't worry, I'll clean up what's there. Nihiltres(t.l) 15:29, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Linda Darby
[edit]The notable parts of this case is that (1) she murdered her husband at a young age, (2) escaped from prison over a barbed wire fence and (3) evaded the police for over 35 years. She is being extradited to Indiana on 10-16-07 and more details should be forthcoming on the murder of her husband. Please be patient!MattFBC 15:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
CCN
[edit]CCN is substantial enough for an article. I am new however to wikipedia and need to study up some on how to form articles. I tried to add some information to show its importance however. Feel free to add to it. Information can be found at www.changeyourcampus.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by JRG39402 (talk • contribs) 16:42, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Medicine Collaboration of the Month
[edit]NCurse work 17:29, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
(cough) Wiki isn't a crystal ball? Does it need one when the game now has an official site, let alone the major announcements on Gamestop, XB360FB, etc? JAF1970 18:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
I too question the hasty AfD for a game that is *not* merely speculation (as per the Crystal Ball policy), but actual fact. Rebochan 18:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on AfD page, my mistake as I tagged in the early stages of the article where it sounded like speculation, [8]. Phgao 04:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
"Fateslegend"
[edit]The band vanity contributors never learn, do they? One you clobbered earlier today is back. Sigh... --PMDrive1061 00:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
cc Tags
[edit]Thanks a lot my bro. I will check them out soon. kızılsungur 04:00, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
RfA
[edit]Thanks for your comment in my RfA. Although I would have preferred if it were on the support section, I fully understand your reasoning, and appreciate your comment. I have withdrawn my nomination however I look forward to coming back to RfA sometime down the road. Thanks again - Rjd0060 13:49, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
C:\What?
[edit]Pretty funny..lol... Dreadstar † 06:58, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oh..well..um...not sure how you felt about that..but, um....I just had to ROTFL...!! Weird..but funny.. Dreadstar † 07:11, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Cute kid, cute page...but wow, I think I almost had a seizure..heh..wow, my head is still spinning and I have spots in front of my eyes...whoosh..Dreadstar † 07:19, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Flcelloguy's Tool
[edit]Yeah, it's been broken for a while... I don't know when I'll have the time to look at it, though. :( If you know Java, or know someone who might be interested in joining the editcounter project, poke me on my talk, ok? The "main" developers are extremely busy in real life... Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 18:33, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]Paul Chakola has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for the welcome note.Keep it going.
Paul Chakola 11:52, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
"db-redirnone"
[edit]When you add the {{db-redirnone}} to a page, please add it on a separate line, and not into the middle of the word "REDIRECT". This way, you will not break up the word. Thanks! --Metropolitan90 13:27, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Johnstone Burgh FCBC 1993 & John FitzGerald
[edit]My articles on Johnstone Burgh FCBC 1993 & John FitzGerald are both notable. I admit Elderslie West (the burgh's pitch) & Alan Thompson (sub left winger) are not notable. The team I have written about are notable as most of the west of Scotland will know who they are, and as for John FitzGerald he is a superb player & a key member of their squad despite the fact he is currently still recovering from a hamstring injury picked up in August while playing for Queen's Park FC who I'm sure can be counted as notable as they are one of the most famous clubs in Scotland —Preceding unsigned comment added by DLB 4 eva (talk • contribs) 15:29, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Substitute template
[edit]Check Template talk:Vangel, but basically it is probably because you didn't substitute the template. Ariel♥Gold 15:38, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure who deleted Afrothunder, but I'm not happy
[edit]I made a page called Afrothunder, and someone deleted it.
Sorry I didn't cite a published source, but I know Afrothunder! I interviewed him this morning! I'd like that page to be put back up, please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onaamu (talk • contribs) 16:39, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
I just left a message and forgot to sign. sorry. Onaamu 16:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]Thanks for that! Keep up the good work at WP:NPP! The Rambling Man 17:34, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
And we're off!
[edit]Thanks for all your support! The RfA was a success... now I can learn about the mop, and perhaps mentor you on the path to adminship as well down the road. Let's face it, your well on the way! Hiberniantears 16:55, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for signing. Really appreciate it. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:52, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. I like yours too. Its very creative. So, what type of exams are you taking? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
RfA thank-spam
[edit]Thank you! Thank you for your help in my RfA, especially asking what needed to be asked. It hammered home a few things I need to keep in mind while admining and passed with a final tally of 40/0/4; two people forgot to vote in time, leaving me short of that exquisite number :-(, but I'll just have to fudge the next vote about me. Adminship feels slightly august but not particularily exalted, so I shall endeavour to consider it a toolkit and make sincere efforts to know what I'm doing before using it. If you later on have something to say or want to ask for -- MESSAGE EATEN BY BEARS --Kizor 15:04, 24 October 2007 (UTC) |
Dearest Supporter,
Thanks!
[edit]Yeah, I saw that! Thanks for the nice message. Sorry about the earlier misunderstanding. It'll teach me to pick my subjects a bit more carefully. --PMDrive1061 15:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Your VandalSniper Application
[edit]
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 33
[edit]Great news! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 33 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/10/26/wikipedia-weeekly-30/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP (?) 07:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
You supported EV twice on his adminship request so I took the liberty of removing your latest support..sorry..--Cometstyles 11:54, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Australia Day is new ACOTF
[edit]Hi. You supported Australia Day for Australian Collaboration. It has been selected, please help to improve it in any way you can. Thanks. Good luck with your exams! --Scott Davis Talk 13:07, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Podiobooks.com
[edit]Howdy, I can't find any record of why my Podiobooks.com entry was deleted. Please explain. I answered criteria in reply. Entry does meet wiki requirements. Thank you. Please reply on my talk page. ElizaBarrington 21:32, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Successful RfA - Thank you!
[edit]Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. It was successful, and I was promoted to Administrator today. I appreciate the support! — KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 22nd, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 43 | 22 October 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
Sorry for the tardiness in sending the Signpost this week. --Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
RFA Thanks
[edit]My dear Wikipedian Phgao,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 36 supports, 3 opposed, and 1 neutral. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, or even if you just stopped by to make a comment, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. Since I am a new admin, if you have any suggestions or concerns, feel free to inform me of them. Thank you and good day.
Credits
[edit]This RFA thanks was inspired by The Random Editor, who in turn was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunately this is not entirely my own design.
This end the usual RFA thanks spam. You may return to your regular editing now.
You helped choose 12-hour clock as this week's WP:ACID winner
[edit]Wikipedia has a second Carlos admin
[edit]My dear Wikipedian Phgao,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 29 supports, 1 opposed, and 3 neutral. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, or even if you just stopped by to make a comment, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. Since I am a new admin, if you have any suggestions or concerns, feel free to inform me of them. Special thanks to Carlossuarez46 for encourage me and nomination. Thank you and good day.
Credits
[edit]This RFA thanks was inspired by The Random Editor, who in turn was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunately this is not entirely my own design.
This end the usual RFA thanks spam. You may return to your regular editing now.
Congrats
[edit]My (KWSN's) RFA
[edit]Thank you for supporting my recent (and successful!) RfA. It passed at at 55/17/6. Kwsn (Ni!) 01:23, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you!
[edit]My RFA | ||
Thanks for your support in my recent request for adminship, which was successful. I'll do my best to justify the confidence you've placed in me! Dppowell 22:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC) |
Signpost updated for October 29th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 44 | 29 October 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Question
[edit]this IP is actually a college so it should be blocd for for editing
--ecaftons —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.219.116.40 (talk) 10:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Click "show" to see my message.
|
My recent RfA
[edit]Thank you for participating in my recent RfA. Although the voting ended at 36/22/5, there was no consensus to promote, and the RfA was unsuccessful. I would like the thank you nonetheless for supporting me during the RfA, and hope that any future RfA’s proceed better than this one did. Again, I thank you for your support. ≈ The Haunted Angel Review Me! 02:21, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support
[edit]Thanks for your support with respect to my request for adminship, which successfully closed today with a count of 47 support, 1 oppose. If you ever see me doing anything that makes you less than pleased that you supported my request, I hope to hear about it from you. See you around Wikipedia! Accounting4Taste 05:00, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]My RFA | ||
Thanks for participating in my request for adminship, which ended with 56 supports, one oppose, and one neutral. I hope to accomplish beyond what is expected of me and work to help those that lent me their trust. east.718 at 02:30, 11/4/2007 |
Wikipedia has a new administrator!
[edit]The Meetup Badge
[edit]Thanks, that's very nice of you. Sorry you don't like the badge; I only intended it for actual Meetups, and not for walking around a city. It was just a suggestion at best. Have fun at the Meetup! Nightscream 16:58, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
GlassCobra's RfA
[edit]My RFA | ||
Hey Phgao! Thanks for your support in my request for adminship, which ended with 61 supports, 3 opposes, and 1 neutral. I hope your confidence in me proves to be justified, and please feel free to call on me if you ever need any help or opinions! Thanks again! GlassCobra 01:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks
[edit]Thank you for supporting me in my recent RFA which unfortunately did not pass at (47/23/5). I will be sure to improve my editing skills and wait till someone nominates me next time. Have a great day(or night)! --Hdt83 Chat 05:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for supporting my RfA, it closed today with a final tally of 39 supports, 1 oppose and 1 neutral. As always, if you ever see me doing anything which would cause you to regret giving me your support, let me know. henrik•talk 18:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you bunches!
[edit]Thank you so much for suppporting my RfA. I was promoted with a total of (44/1/0) - a vote of confidence from the community that I find humbling and motivating. I will not abuse your trust. Look forward to working with you! (Esprit15d 21:38, 5 November 2007 (UTC)) |
Thank you for your support.
[edit]
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 34
[edit]zOMG! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 34 has been released, and it's the biggest panel in quite a while!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/11/03/wikipedia-weekly-34-aka-fundraiser/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 05:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
Another RfA Spaming
[edit]
OhanaUnited's RfA
[edit]Thanks for voting at my RfA. Unfortunately, the result stands at 51 support, 21 oppose and 7 neutral which means that I did not succeed. As many expressed their appreciation of my works in featured portals during my RfA, I will fill up the vacuum position of director in featured portal candidates to maintain the standards of featured contents in addition to my active role in Good articles. Have a great day. OhanaUnitedTalk page 04:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Wallowing in my RfA: This time it's personal... | ||
My sincere thanks for your support in my request for adminship, which ended with 51 supports, 0 opposes, and 0 neutral. Doubtless it was an error to put one of the government-bred race of pigmen in any position of authority, but I hope your confidence in me proves justified. Even a man pure of heart and who says his prayers at night can become a were-boar when the moon is full and sweet. Fortunately, I'm neither a were-pig nor pure of heart so this doesn't appear to be an imminent danger to Wikipedia for the moment. Fortunate as well because were-pig hooves are hell on keyboards and none too dexterous with computer mice. If ever I should offend, act uncivil, misstep, overstep, annoy, violate policy, or attempt to topple the fascist leadership of Wikipedia, please let me know so I can improve my behaviour and/or my aim. I am not an animal; I am an admin. And, of course, if there is any way in which I can help you on Wikipedia, please do not hesitate to ask me. Despite my japes, I am indeed dedicated to protecting and serving Wikipedia to the best of my foppish and impudent abilities. I will strive to be an admirable admin, shiny and cool, reasonable and beatific. Pigmanwhat?/trail 05:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
|
Medicine Collaboration of the Week
[edit]
NCurse work 18:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Some thankyou spam
[edit]Thankyou for supporting my successful rfa which closed with 58 supports. If i am honest i am rather humbled by the unanimous support and i hope to live up to everyones expectations. If you ever need any help, don't hesitate to ask. Thanks again. Woodym555 13:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Famous Pacific Shipping
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Famous Pacific Shipping, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Fabrictramp 19:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 35
[edit]Let us rejoyce! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 35 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/11/11/episode-35-secretly-famous/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 01:35, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
Cabinet of Australia
[edit]Hi Phgao. Cabinet of Australia has been selected for ACOTF, but with only two votes. Please help to improve it however you can, assuming your exams are over before the end of this collaboration period. Hopefully others will join in to help improve the article too. Good luck with your remaining exams. --Scott Davis Talk 14:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
My (Remember the dot)'s RfA
[edit]I never thanked you for participating in my RfA a couple of weeks ago. Thank you for your support, though unfortunately the request was closed as "no consensus". I plan to run again at a later time, and I hope you will support me again then.
Thanks again! —Remember the dot (talk) 06:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 5th and 12th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 45 | 5 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 46 | 12 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:10, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
My RfA
[edit]Thank you so much for voicing your support in my successful RfA. I'm humbled to have the community's trust. As I master the ways of the mop and bucket, please don't hesitate to message me for any advice or corrections. Cheers! Spellcast 23:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]Howdy Phgao, thanks for participating in my request for adminship. I am happy to say it was successful, 55/0/0, and I am looking forward to getting to work. Thanks for your vote of confidence. By all means, feel free to check in on my work to come. Suggestions and advice are always appreciated.
--TeaDrinker 05:46, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
RfA
[edit]I considered not spamming talk pages but not saying "thanks" just isn't me. The support was remarkable and appreciated. I only hope that I am able to help a little on here. Please let me know if I can help you or equally if you find any of my actions questionable. Thanks & regards --Herby talk thyme 12:24, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Owl farm
[edit]Please delete Owl farm and remove speedy delete from Owl Farm. BBerryhill (talk) 06:13, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Greetings
[edit]Greetings Phgao. Was nice to meet you today; there are some images here that perhaps may be of interest to you. :) Cheers, Sarah 14:24, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 47 | 19 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:33, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your vote
[edit]
Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 48 | 26 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 36
[edit]Hey! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 36 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/11/30/wikipedia-weekly-36/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 04:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
man, you guys are very sneaky...how do you catch all of our editing stuff? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.198.4.127 (talk) 09:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 49 | 3 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Leukduck.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Leukduck.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 50 | 10 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Episodes 37 and 38
[edit]Well, gee whiz! I don't check WP:WEEKLY for a few days and look what happens: I miss two new episodes. Nonetheless, Wikipedia Weekly Episode 37 and Episode 38 have been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/12/10/wikipedia-weekly-37-rundown/ and http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/12/14/episode-38-interview-wbrianna-laugher/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 02:04, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 51 | 17 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 19:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 39
[edit]Wikipedia Weekly Episode 39 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/12/18/episode-39-knol-pointer/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 06:19, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 52 | 26 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)