User talk:Pharaph

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 13:55, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Kálmán Tihanyi into Iconoscope. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:08, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I copied a Quote, and the text of an encyclopedia. I think they are not original wiki content. Pharaph (talk) 20:14, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You copied the block quote, but you also copied the preceding prose ("In a Technikatörténeti Szemle article, subsequently reissued on the internet, entitled The Iconoscope: Kálmán Tihanyi and the Development of Modern Television, Tihanyi's daughter Katalin Tihanyi Glass notes that her father found the "storage principle" included a "new physical phenomenon", the photoconductive effect)" — Diannaa (talk) 20:54, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

It appears that you copied or moved text from Austro-Hungarian Compromise of 1867 to Hungarian Revolution of 1848. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Repeated violations of Wikipedia's attribution requirements may result in the loss of editing privileges. DanCherek (talk) 14:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will rewrite the sentences with CHATGPT 4 with the same references, because it is faster for me. Will it be OK for you? Pharaph (talk) 19:09, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Um, no. That would still clearly be a derivative work of the original, so attribution would still be needed to respect the Creative Commons license. What is so hard about providing attribution in the edit summary? DanCherek (talk) 23:35, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Please do not remove requests for citations on obviously incorrect information, and try to not misinterpret your own quoted sources.The Proffesor (talk) 12:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear "Professor" !

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austria-Hungary#Rail_transport

My statement about A_H railway network in the lead section has a citatiion in the Railway section, with exact numbers of the greatest European railways..

See citation 237: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austria-Hungary#Rail_transport

Broadberry, Stephen; O'Rourke, Kevin H. (2010). The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Europe: Volume 2, 1870 to the Present. Cambridge University Press. p. 80. ISBN 978-1-139-48951-5.

June 2023

Hello, I'm Binksternet. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Miklós Horthy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 17:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (third request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Treaty of Trianon into Hungary in World War I. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:55, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! IF you think about the pictures about ethnic groups, I created that contents with Microsoft Office's Excel :) --Pharaph (talk) 17:32, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Serbian campaign. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Aeengath (talk) 10:00, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to György Dózsa has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Mohacs

You wrote "the Serbian hussars (the only Christian light cavalry units in the battle)"

Do you have a reference for that?

There were many other horsemen - including the horsemen of the Croatian ban. Ovo.Je.Istina (talk) 19:13, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can change it to Southern Slavic if you wish. The Croatian ban did not join to the Christian army, due to the slow recruitment, so Croatian army did not reach the battle. There were Croatian units in the battle, who lived close to Hungarian border, but the most of Croatian soldiers joined to the ban's army, which did not arrive.--Pharaph (talk) 08:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Láng Machine Factory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HVG. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Austria-Hungary. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Naming a talk page section after a specific editor's behavior is considered very bad form unless that person is very obviously problematic. Please read WP:AGF. Joy (talk) 09:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Joy (talk) 09:33, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Austria-Hungary

You're making the thread on the talk page unreadable because you are not indenting. Please read WP:INDENT it explains how we post to talk pages so that others can follow the discussion. Also, don't add extra blank lines in between paragraphs within the same message. The thread is now such a mess I doubt anyone will bother to read it. DeCausa (talk) 16:50, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:War of the currents

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at War of the currents, Talk:War of the currents, User:Fountains of Bryn Mawr, and User talk:Fountains of Bryn Mawr. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 20:41, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:War of the currents [1]. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 14:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alternating current, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Barrington.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Please refrain from making disruptive edits to Central Europe.

As explained in my revert, your assertion was misinformed. At its height, the Ottoman empire controlled the vast majority of the kingdom with the exception of a small northwestern portion.

Furthermore, your second edit is not necessary and you had already pasted this text on various articles. Karaynn (talk) 13:23, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interestingly, academic historians don't know about that fantasy. It goes against the consensus of historians and all reliable (Oxford Chambridge) maps. Pharaph (talk) 14:45, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Minor

I notice that you often mark your edits as minor, even when they are not. Please see WP:MINOR about when to – and not least when not to – use the minor marking. Regards! T*U (talk) 09:33, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (4th request)

It appears that you copied or moved text from Austria-Hungary to Central Europe. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Repeated violations of Wikipedia's attribution requirements may result in the loss of editing privileges. DanCherek (talk) 23:36, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Stubes99 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stubes99. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 04:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]