User talk:Peterwilliamphipps

On 8th December 2011, The Civil Court in Hamburg made the following decision:

John Rossall is not allowed to: - Announce or carry out, or to let anybody announce or carry out, shows or advertisements using the name “Glitter Band” or “The Glitterband featuring John Rossall”.

This ruling is in agreement with judgements ordered in The British High Court in 1984 and 1997.

There has never been an order that allows John Rossall to use Ex Glitter Band.

Pete Phipps The Glitter Band

The Glitter Band

As you have a clear conflict of interest here, I'm going to ask you to cease editing for the moment. We've been made aware of the fact that this article has become a battleground for band-related disputes, which is unacceptable. I will go through the article in the next few days to examine the warring edits, sources, references, etc. Any further communication should take place in the article's talk page for maximum visibility. Thank you for your understanding. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:20, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, please refrain from further editing User talk:Crescendo25, and please see my comment at Talk:The Glitter Band. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:42, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Crescendo25 (Rossall) is still editing the article and inserting false information, so I am only undoing anything that is innacurate obviously. Pete Phipps

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Pete on Rogers.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Pete on Rogers.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Professor Nicholas J Lowe (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, lacks any sources or references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Professor Nicholas J Lowe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Professor Nicholas J Lowe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:50, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Peterwilliamphipps! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:50, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas J. Lowe (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Yanjipy were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicholas J. Lowe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nicholas J. Lowe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Yanjipy (talk) 18:48, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nicholas J. Lowe

Hello, Peterwilliamphipps. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nicholas J. Lowe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. aboideau^talk 16:02, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nicholas J. Lowe

Hello, Peterwilliamphipps. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nicholas J. Lowe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:38, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]