User talk:Petergriffin9901/Archive 7

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Merry Christmas!

Please i need your help. How can i re-write this "Jean and producer Toby Gad were strolling in Times Square when the former saw hot dogs that enticed her being peddled on the street. Jean was lamenting about how she was trying to stay away from the hot dogs and noted how if she were a boy, she could probably eat one without regrets. That led to her musing on how if she were a boy, she would be much better than her ex. Gad asked Jean to repeat her sentiments into a recorder. They returned to the studio and wrote the song in 15 minutes. Jean recorded her version of the song which was rejected by her record company." Jivesh boodhun (talk) 08:13, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh Nathan, you are simply great. Thanks. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 08:30, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Let this Christmas bring you the gift of peace and joy! Merry Christmas :) Novice7 | Talk 04:06, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

For this. Lol, at above. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:57, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Haha, no problem buddy :) Nice job on it!--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 04:59, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

lmao

I love you for what you answered in my talk page, lol. The guy is such a loser, he goes page to page removing Forbes data. Xwomanizerx (talk) 05:33, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

I think that user should be reported. I just noticed vanadalism on Petergriffin's user page. And the edit warring on Britney Spears. ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT 17:28, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Haha, I knew you guys would get a kick outta that! When I saw that I just had to step in :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 19:24, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

I warned him, let me deal with the heiffer and keep me updated in case he vandalizes again. Will make admins block him soon than Britney announces the lead single. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Ahhh, Admin in training :) Thank you!--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 07:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello!

Hello Nathan. I was wondering if we could start working on TGIFY two or three days later. What do you say? I'll give you my e-mail when you're ready with scans. Hope it's not time consuming :) Novice7 | Talk 11:46, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes, thank you. I was wondering I'm Your Baby Tonight too. It's okay. Novice7 | Talk 03:22, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Actually I don't know how to send e-mail through wiki. Shall I paste it here? Novice7 | Talk 07:42, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh, is it this WP:EMAIL? Novice7 | Talk 07:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

I guess it's "okay" then. And, lol, you're a genius :D Novice7 | Talk 09:31, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Butterfly

Yes, I'll do a copy-edit, no problem at all. It may not be until next week at the earliest, but I'll definitely do it. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:30, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

I've made a start. I had a look at the background section and copy-edited it. Also left a couple of queries on talk. See what you think so far. Don't worry about reverting anything which doesn't work, or if I've slipped any UK English in by mistake! --Sarastro1 (talk) 17:24, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

I've finally done! There's quite a long list at the talk page but there is nothing else I have noticed. I'm not planning on saying anything else and I won't copy-edit or comment again unless you ask. I would suggest, if you address my points, put it up at peer review for someone else to have a look. If you really want it to be a FA, this would help as you get some more uninvolved eyes. Good luck! --Sarastro1 (talk) 14:33, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Mail

Hello, Petergriffin9901. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Wow, thank you so much Nathan :) I'll start working soon. Novice7 | Talk 03:38, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

New Zealand

Yes, and I even got mail from RIANZ with all Celine's certifications. But that was around 2005. I tried the same this year for Mariah but they ignored me. --Max24 (talk) 17:18, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Hitmixes Removal

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitmixes (2nd nomination) Contribute to the discussion, please!--Blackjacks101 (talk) 22:26, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Beyoncé Wiki-project

Please see here... Notice about recent GAs -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 06:00, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi!

Hi Nathan! It's been sometime since we heard from you.. I'll work on TGIFY soon. I'm gonna have to study for exams the coming two weeks. I'll surely complete it :) Novice7 | Talk 16:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Who's That Girl (film)/GA1

Will you have time to review it? If not, then let others step in. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Mariah Carey (album) GA Review

Hey Nathan, just wanted to let you know I am going to review your article, and have posted a few errors with your links. =D--Blackjacks101 (talk) 23:33, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

I continued the review and you have a few errors to fix before I do more reviewing =D--Blackjacks101 (talk) 02:19, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

The article has now been placed on hold for 7 days.--Blackjacks101 (talk) 19:41, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Kk take your time!--Blackjacks101 (talk) 12:46, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Just added one last comment for you too fix but other then that....I'll pass soon =D--Blackjacks101 (talk) 01:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

K thanks for explaining I understand your point of view I'll pass the article :)--Blackjacks101 (talk) 03:37, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello again!

Hello Nathan! Welcome back! I read about your sister's marriage. I'm happy to hear that :) Btw, I finished up an article and am ready to start work on TGIFY. As a matter of fact, I found some interesting info about that (copyright infringement suit and others). And, "Brit" is back! HIAM is amazing!!! I hope she would dance like she used to do before, in the music video. Novice7 | Talk 12:26, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

HIAM

It's amazing. I'm still livid though, lol. What do you think? Xwomanizerx (talk) 13:17, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Could use your help :D

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Freakum_Dress_(3rd_nomination)

EDIT-your opinion, in general, would be appreciated. Theuhohreo (talk) 14:21, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

WTG

He he even I wasnt clear as to which image you were talking bout. I have removed it. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Suga Mama

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Suga_Mama_(2nd_nomination)

your opinion on this would be nice 74.72.160.180 (talk) 04:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello again!

Seems like you're back Nathan. I was waiting for you to come, so that we can start on the article. Where can we put the details of the lawsuit? On Background maybe? Also, can you please take a look at My Heart Is Calling and leave your comments at my talk? I read that Whitney is gonna start working on a new album by June. I hope she returns to singing like she used to during Waiting to Exhale - Preacher's Wife era (atleast). Novice7 | Talk 14:30, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Seeing some other articles, I feel it can go into Background. Novice7 | Talk 12:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Sigh. Hmmm... Atleast I can hope :( Though WTE, Preacher's Wife and MLIYL era had her voice lost in drugs, they were good. I Look to You is not at all neat like before. I say I'm Your Baby Tonight era – The Best of Nippy ;) Oh well, I actually started work, but deleted it all as I felt it was not going properly.

You think so? Awww, thank you. I love the "Divas", you know :P Nippy & Mimi top the list, and Jessica, Ashanti, Carrie are just my likes, not "obsessions". To be frank, I'm not into Celine stuff that much, although I do like her That's the Way It Is, and the whole Miracle album. Novice7 | Talk 16:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Nippy is her nickname from childhood (just like Mimi). I do like her, so I thought I'd call her Nippy :) I'll get into TGIFY. I need to find some reviews for it. Novice7 | Talk 16:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Oh, found something. The lawsuit was cleared in favor of Mimi -> Here. Novice7 | Talk 16:52, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

(→) Yes, I noticed. Not only for new songs. But for credited samples, and even covers some file lawsuit :O I noticed that Mimi's voice is a little bit thin right now, and I'm pretty sure she would come back like EOM era! About Brit, some people get jealous when others use their material and gain sucess, lol :| Novice7 | Talk 17:04, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Euro-dance? I really like her R&B-pop thing, and that's what made me love her. I agree that she needs a new sound, but don't think Euro-dance is a good choice. I mean, she is an amazing belter, and not like her. And, alcohol? Does she still take that? I wanna see another big comeback with tip-top shape and voice ;) Novice7 | Talk 17:28, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Yes, me too. Alcohol is not good, I absolutely agree :) For the time being, I'll put her 1990-1999 albums on repeat (with Glitter in the middle) and along with Whit's 1985-1998 albums.. Novice7 | Talk 17:36, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Talk:List of best-selling music artists

How is everything Nathan? I have a suggestion posted at Talk:List of best-selling music artists. Your thoughts would be appreciated.--Harout72 (talk) 20:30, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

You and Tbhotch‎

Hi there. I don't really know what's going on between the two of you, and nor do I particularly care, but perhaps we can all take a deep breath and tone it down as the personal attacks seem to be getting out of hand on both sides. Maybe take a walk? Thanks. Zachlipton (talk) 09:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

I thought you were above all this. Why the hell I see you repeating the same thing over and over again? I did not see a single out-of-bound comment at the FAC from Tbhotch or from Indopug also. I thought you wanted to refrain from the process right because it was unjust? Then when you have decided to submit an article again, be patient against any comments. If you start getting mad at Tbhotch for those simple just comments, you have no idea dude how sharp and pointy some reviewers can be. Those comments above crossed the limit of Civility and Personal attack. I should have placed a NPA template here, but I see Tbhotch already did it. Please cease all activities like this Nathan. Ultimately what is getting hurt is the article, and you as an editor. And by the way, don't ever do those 1-for-1 reviews. I'm keeping an eye on all of you. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 18:25, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Certification-levels

Hey Nathan, yeah I think we'll implement the percentages into the template one of these days. The certification levels are posted at the footnotes of The list of best-selling music artists. For the Netherlands see this official document I've received from NVPI, for Sweden see this official document, for Argentina they have their levels posted on their site, Switzerland has their levels posted too at the top of their page. For Austria, I still don't have any official documents, but based on my research, before approximately 2001 the levels were Platinum=50,000, Gold=25,000 both for albums and singles. Approximately, since 2001-2004 they were Platinum=40,000, Gold=20,000. Since 2005-2006 Platinum=30,000, Gold=15,000. Since 2007-present for albums Platinum=20,000, Gold=10,000, the levels for singles have not changed since approximately 2005. Hope all this helps:).--Harout72 (talk) 20:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Vision of Love

The article seems fine as a whole, but I don't feel I have the qualifications to comment on its overall quality. I'm more of a chart enthusiast, so I pay more attention to those sections and can provide some comments there. First, both the "Chart performance" and "Charts" sections contain info on certifications as well. A song's certification level has nothing to do with chart performance and so the header titles should reflect what's being presented. Some of the chart and certifications are not sourced within the "Chart performance", so just use <refs> from the "Charts" section to note them as well.

I don't really like the use of actual charts as sources, but I guess if it provides the information being claimed it serves its purpose. For example, the Canada charts indicate its debut position and in which week it reached #1, but the 17 week run is not confirmed by the chart source. It says it was on the chart for 17 weeks at the time, but how do I know it didn't stay on the chart for another week or two? I believe the UK chart info provides info similarly – I don't see where it says it stayed on the chart there for 12 weeks.

Finally, and I know that articles have received GA rating with them, I don't know how articles pass a GA review that have succession boxes. As is, you would have to source the dates it was at #1, each week that it was at #1, and each of its predecessors and successors as being #1 before and after "Vision of Love". At the very least, I think these should placed at the bottom of articles per WP:FOOTERS and, at best, should be removed altogether. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 17:57, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank God I Found You

Okay, I wanna let you know that I'll complete it soon. I couldn't find much reviews for the song. I'm still searching. Also, do you happen to know any source for Canadian singles chart (2000). I couldn't find that too :( Novice7 | Talk 14:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

RE:Joint GA

Yeppppp sounds greatttt!! I'll get try to get started this weekend. Candyo32 - Happy New Year :) 21:58, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Yeah I'm fine with those sections, although I might would need a lil bit of your help for the background. Candyo32 - Happy New Year :) 00:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Couln't help but notice, TEOM deserves better sections. Background should be cokmpletely focussing on the breakdown stuff. I have a strong feeling that a section called "Recovery" is in order, otherwise the background section will be too long. What do you guys think? — Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:34, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Recovery? What do you mean? I mean we have the basic sections broken down. I'm guessing the "Recovery" section will discuss about the whole Glitter and CB and how this album was a huge turn for her. Any tips?--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 18:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

No, the recovery section, or rather the emancipation section would explain what she had gone through, the fights, the rehabs, and how she came out from it. I think this is of utmost importance as it will provide a strong backbone as to why the song's were like that (forget the pun) on TEOM. The album name and its explanation is also predominantly important. The success of TEOM is good, but there needs to be a backbone to validate it. Hope you understnad. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

I haven't been able to work on the project like I had planned, but I will start soon. Candyo32 - Happy New Year :) 14:50, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Ughhh im sick a lil bit and don't feel well. So since I don't feel like doing much a nothinnn, I'll fix some Bieber articles I'm working on and begin TEOM :) Candyo32 - Happy New Year :) 23:18, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

I was hoping to be done by now, but I have had some setbacks and still gathering sources. Bear with me lol. Candyo32 - Happy New Year :) 02:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm really trying hard to have it done by the end of the week. Is that fine? Candyo32 15:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm actually glad you said that, because I'd rather pace myself with it, since it is alot to deal with. But I'm going to try to have it done by Sunday. One thing with me & Wiki is that its hard for me to consistently work on one project, I have to dabble in ten each day lol. But yeah, that's the prob with GA's now, they are written hastily like the world is gonna end tomorrow (i.e The Queen Beyonce articles [no offense :O]). Candyo32 22:23, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I was supposed to collaborate with them on alot of the Sasha Fierce article but they were done and nominated for GA before I could even find information! And now the fallen GA/FA's of Beyonce have been revamped, and no offense, but I'd had rather seen them the way they were before. At least they are sustainable and held their own, but now they are just lots of meat of information without a backbone (i.e. this massive mess) But yep, TEOM article needs to be respective of the opus it is. Candyo32 22:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

As much as I fuss at him, I try not to be hard on him because he actually means well, his devoted-ness to his Queen is just so strong lol. I just think it absurd that these articles are now being flaunted around by people as some of Wiki's best. Anyway, I'm going to go MIA to dabble into some Minajesty articles, before my attention deviates elsewhere. Candyo32 22:45, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

ILT

You might be interested to know that I will start working soon on "Its Like That". I will let you know which sandbox I will be using, so that you can add any pointers you might want to. Be patient and bear with me. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:32, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Linkin Park discography/archive3

Hi Nathan, and thanks for your review of the above FLC. If it's not too much trouble, do you think you can cap your resolved comments (using something like Template:Resolved comments)? That would make the nomination page shorter and easier for me to read. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 23:20, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

TEOM

Hey Nathan :) I hid some of the non free media (album art and song samples) on your TEOM sandbox. Hope its okay. I hope you're not mad, as I've not completed TGIFY yet. I'll get on it, I promise. And, when EOM works begin, I'll do Fly Like a Bird :) Novice7 | Talk 06:09, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you!!! Yes, HIAM was great, and I don't wanna see another "Blackout", lol. Rihanna's moving too fast, I mean, she's just 22! I wish Brit would do some "Oops+Britney+In the Zone" stuff. And, yes, I do love Whitney, and I watched the BET show. She was okay, and her head voice is returning, but at a very slowww rate. Okay, I'll be free for two or three days, and I'll do TGIFY and start FLAB. Yes, WBT needs some minor fixes. Oh, this user is working on Whitney stuff too, and he/she helps a lot. Too bad he/she doesn't talk too much :| Novice7 | Talk 09:44, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

You're absolutely right. I tried to tell him/her, but he/she doesn't respond. Oh, its not an award show, its Celebration of Gospel. But, Kim Burrell killed the song. She was amazing!!! (check 2:47) Here's the video Link. Novice7 | Talk 09:55, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

You think so? Everyone on Youtube posted like "Crackney is nothing, Kim was amazing".... Thank God you understood. Hmmm.. You're right. I listen to her old songs like this one, here. I wish I had a time machine so that I can turn everything around, lol :D Novice7 | Talk 10:09, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Lol, yes. Omg!! I was thinking same thing about Mariah. But, not 97 but 95–96. Novice7 | Talk 10:15, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Yes. Exactly. Novice7 | Talk 10:19, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Nat, does the Billboard Book of #1 Hits have any quotes related to All the Man That I Need? If so, can you add them to the article? Novice7 | Talk 12:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

It's okay. Crowded (talk · contribs) already added something, and I was wondering if Fred had more. I heard Mimi's twins are a boy and a girl. Maybe the next "Mariah", lol. Novice7 | Talk 06:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Lmao, yes. What do you think of getting WBT to FA status? It's a fairly recent phenomenon, so... Novice7 | Talk 06:24, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

It has received widespread coverage, and it's already a GA. The Music and Background is great, we have to expand the mv, reception sections and add a Live section if possible. And, maybe a Pr. What do you say? Novice7 | Talk 06:32, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Okay. Then we can get on it soon. First, I've to finish up some of my articles (including TGIFY). What about we start on Monday? Novice7 | Talk 06:44, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Yes, we can :) Novice7 | Talk 06:48, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi Nathan! Whenever you get time, can you scan me some Whitney songs from Fred Bronson? Whenever you're free. No rush at all :) I spotted some errors on WBT which I'll fix. Novice7 | Talk 05:09, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Great :D What about Greatest Love of All, Saving All My Love for You, and Exhale? Novice7 | Talk 05:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Nope, I won't =D I'll surely complete it. Novice7 | Talk 06:09, 6 February 2011 (UTC)