User talk:Peter G Werner/2017-2020
UCSF project
[edit]Hi! I am currently revamping the UCSF project. I created lots of pages and added a lot of content, but there is so much still to do. I saw that you are part of the SFBA task force, so I thought you might be interested and I wanted to invite you to collaborate once more. In particular, we need to add content, do maintenance, and we really would benefit from pictures, so if you are in SF and could help that would be great. Thanks!Eccekevin (talk) 15:11, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 |
Hello, Peter G Werner/2017-2020! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject University of California, San Francisco, an outreach effort which aims to support development of UCSF related articles in Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants, check out our To Do list, and join the discussion on our talk page. Thanks!!! |
 |
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Peter G Werner. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
User:Peter G Werner/Template:Infobox Scientist listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect User:Peter G Werner/Template:Infobox Scientist. Since you had some involvement with the User:Peter G Werner/Template:Infobox Scientist redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 21:58, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject Apple Inc.
[edit]
Hello Peter G Werner,
You've been identified either as a previous member of the project, an active editor on Apple related pages, a bearer of Apple related userboxes, or just a hoopy frood.
WikiProject Apple Inc. has unexpectedly quit, because an error type "unknown" occured. Editors must restart it! If you are interested, read the project page and sign up as a member. There's something for everyone to do, such as welcoming, sourcing, writing, copy editing, gnoming, proofreading, or feedback — but no pressure. Do what you do, but let's coordinate and stay in touch.
See the full welcome message on the talk page, or join the new IRC channel on irc.freenode.net named #wikipedia-en-appleinc connect. Please join, speak, and idle, and someone will read and reply.
Please spread the word, and join or unsubscribe at the subscription page.
- RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) and Smuckola on behalf of WikiProject Apple Inc. - Delivered 15:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for May 18
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heroin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Recrystallization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The file File:BlackFlagNervousBreakdown.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Sample used in Black Flag (band), Hardcore punk, and Nervous Breakdown (EP) but insufficiently covered by critical commentary. May fail WP:NFCC#8 (and WP:NFCC#3a if applicable)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of File:I Against I.ogg
[edit]I recently proposed deletion on File:I Against I.ogg. If the tag is left uncontested for more than seven days, the sample will be deleted. If it is removed, then I won't be able to reinsert the tag. I may likely take it to WP:FFD. --George Ho (talk) 12:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Pay to Cum.ogg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pay to Cum.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 08:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 29
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Death Ship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stateless.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021
[edit] Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Carrie (1976 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:44, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Trend until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Toa Nidhiki05 18:50, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 16
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anne Heche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Another World.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 26
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Susan Bergman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wheaton College.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
AFD and Old Vedanta Society Temple
[edit]Hi Peter G Werner, Thank you for participating thoughtfully/generously at ongoing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filbert Street (San Francisco). I've taken a different stance there but I suppose I don't mind however it turns out. Including I do appreciate your noting the topic of "Old Vedanta Society Temple", which wasn't properly noticed anywhere in Wikipedia, as I think you were pointing out. I set up Old Vedanta Society Temple as a redirect for now, to a row in List of Hindu temples in the United States that existed but which had no statement of its importance. It would be good if the redirect could be converted into a full proper article. The building looks very neat; it would be great if a gallery of pics about it could be shown, but I think there are only 1 or 2 available. I hope you keep participating and developing about SF or whatever else are your interests here. cheers, --Doncram (talk) 19:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Doncram! Thanks for the heads-up. You might also want to add something in the entry for "Vedanta Society of Northern California" about the "New Temple" and Vallejo and Fillmore Streets, built in 1959 and used for most of their worship activities. Though the "Old Temple" is still actively used for some functions as well. I don't go out to Cow Hollow much anymore, but it wouldn't be hard to go out there and take some pictures. Though I'm not sure what I could contribute that would be better than the image you're already using.
- On the topic of Filbert Steps, there's actually material I want to contribute on the topic of the Filbert/Greenwich/Vallejo steps, but still feel that would be best covered as a section of the Telegraph Hill article. Peter G Werner (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for replying, and, great... I am frankly confused about whether there are multiple separated sections of steps called the same or differently. Btw, I have article Draft:Dipsea Trail to finish; I am impressed by the organizers' documentation with many photos of the Dipsea course; I think it would be awesome if someone could make sense, in a wikipedia article, of the Filbert Steps that way.
- About photos of the temple, oh there is so much more there, inside and out, that might be photographed and directly included as illustrations to make points within an article, or in a gallery below. Have you ever seen Jesus Christ in a yoga pose??? See that and more images, not available to us but maybe you could visit and photograph, at sfvvedanta.org page on Old Temple. The Jesus Christ was painted in 1908, which for artwork in a museum would usually be old enough that copyright would run out, but there's mention there of it being explicitly copyrighted then, and then I dunno if that copyright could have been renewed or what. So there might be something to work out, perhaps requiring a new permission (using wp:OTRS system?) or release of copyright from them, for us to use a new or old image of that artwork. I footnoted that webpage as a source and a couple other sources at the row in the Hindu temples table; one is about a journal article that I will see about getting. Especially if you might visit there, I am getting interested in writing an article citing the journal article and more, and in the process of that would likely identify specific details where a photo would ideally be found.
- cheers, --Doncram (talk) 19:39, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
I see the AFD about Filbert Street was closed "No consensus" with some statement about no prejudice for some continuation. I think i might have done too much there, when my general wish is to support local editors doing what makes sense. I tried to make a case, but more strongly i want to defer to you and others actually developing on the topic. So if you go ahead and develop the topic in Telegraph Hill article or whatever, and then think it is time to redirect the Filbert Street article, I think you should just go ahead with that. I won't object. (U could just make a note at the Talk page left behind, which should have a link to the AFD.) cheers, --Doncram (talk) 19:18, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Edit warring & lack of AGF at E. O. Wilson
[edit]You've been around a while so I'll spare you the template. You should know by now that your recent behavior at E. O. Wilson is unacceptable, from edit warring the disputed template back into the article [1][2] to the assumptions of bad faith on the talk page [3][4][5]. This behavior is quite simply standing in the way of your stated goals, and if it continues may result in sanctions. Generalrelative (talk) 15:01, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- @User:Generalrelative: First, I really don't think you should be removing tags indicating that content is in dispute when they are actively under dispute. If you think there might be a more appropriate tag, I'm open to it. Second, I find your behavior to be equally disruptive. I would sincerely like to discuss this, but I find that the attitude that you're the gatekeeper and I'm the naughty child to be rather unequal one. WP:AGF goes both ways, does it not? Am I not allowed to point out editorial bias when I see it? I am trying to not ascribe motive, but the stated reasons for removing this content from the article come across to me as POV in the extreme, in effect even if not in intent. Peter G Werner (talk) 15:10, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- And as for my statements being "unacceptable", can you point out where I've made a personal attack? I've simply pointed out that I think that the decision to not include this content strikes me as POV (is it "unacceptable" to state this plainly?) and that because it's pretty obvious that there's a vehement disagreement over the shape of this article that it would be a good thing for other editors to evaluate this decision. Peter G Werner (talk) 15:16, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 20
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anne Heche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Advocate.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:IWantItAllNow.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:IWantItAllNow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:IWantItAllNow.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:IWantItAllNow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:IWantItAllNow.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:IWantItAllNow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:IWantItAllNow.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:IWantItAllNow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:IWantItAllNow.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:IWantItAllNow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:IWantItAllNow.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:IWantItAllNow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The file File:NGMiscarriage.ogg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 29
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited M'Changama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Comorian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
This is an encyclopedia that preserves history not an up-to-date business directory or a news ticker or current events website. I fail to see the benefit of removing former locations as long as their closure is mentioned and referenced to reliable sources. Those sources may well have valuable information about the very long history of the business. Cullen328 (talk) 07:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Please see my response on the talk page for the article. I do not think Wikipedia is literally about every random piece of information one can include. It is also worth pointing out that the information you've chosen to keep is outdated and inaccurate while the replacement paragraphs I wrote were succinct and accurate, yet you reverted them out anyway. This is uncivil and uncollaborative behaviour on your part. Peter G Werner (talk) 07:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)