User talk:Perrygogas

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia! You added some one-word definitions of apophasis, paralipsis, and proslepsis to my to-do list. I take it you speak modern Greek? I know a little classical Greek, so I know what they literally mean ("saying no", "leaving on one side", and "taking toward"), but I'm interested in the figures of speech they refer to in English, which is a confusing matter. Thanks anyway though, and χαιρε! (I hope I used that right.) —Keenan Pepper 09:12, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MG Club of Greece

I have proposed this article for deletion. Please remove the "prod" tag if you disagree and either try to improve the article to show notability (see WP:Notability) or discuss the matter on the article's talk page. --Brianyoumans 03:05, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for replying via my talk page. I understand that this is not a for-profit organization. I'm afraid I have gone ahead and proposed the article for deletion via the "AFD" mechanism (see the link on the page to the discussion). I have done this, not because it was a bad article, but because I felt that your organization did not meet the notability requirements for inclusion in Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, or a directory.

I have some suggestions, if you would still like to see some sort of link to your organization from Wikipedia, and still want to participate. First, you can put a link to your organization on your user page (see the tab at the top left). If you join the Greek user groups on Wikipedia, various people will see the link and find out about it. Second, it is possible that while an article on the MG Car Club of Greece is not notable, an article about the international MG Car Club - with links to its local affiliates - might survive. The article might still be of questionable interest to anyone who wasn't an MG owner, but it would obviously have a better chance of surviving. It would help if it was, say, "the largest sports car owner's organization in the world" or "the oldest" or had been involved in some political or legal controversies of interest. I would be willing to look over the article and give advice, if you write one. --Brianyoumans 21:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aligning tables to the right

The code I had on my user page was in fact incorrect, so you are probably better off with Help:Tables if you want to do it the right way. If you look at the source of my user page, the babel and user box templates are placed in a one column table aligned to the right. There are arguably better ways to do this, as tables should generally be avoided when dealing with non-tabular data, but I decided to do it the quick and easy way for my very temporary user page. :) — Nivix ^talk 11:38, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting your input at Wikipedia:WikiProject Economics/Featured Article drive

Since you are a member of WikiProject Economics, I would like to direct your attention to Wikipedia:WikiProject Economics/Featured Article drive. We are currently deciding on an economics-related article to bring to Featured Article status and we would like your input. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 15:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Economics census

Hello there. Sorry to bother you, but you are (titularly at least) a member of WP:WikiProject Economics, as defined by this category. If you don't know me, I'm a Wikipedia administrator, but an unqualified economist. I enjoy writing about economics, but I'm not very good at it, which is why I would like to support in any way I can the strong body of economists here on Wikipedia. I'm only bothering you because you are probably one of them. Together, I'd like us to establish the future direction of WikiProject Economics, but first, we need to know who we've got to help.

Whatever your area of expertise or level of qualification, if you're interested in helping with the WikiProject (even if only as part of a larger commitment to this wonderful online encyclopedia of ours), would you mind adding your signature to this page? It only takes a second. Thank you.

Message delivered on behalf of User:Jarry1250 by LivingBot.

File permission problem with File:Dr. John Psarouthakis.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dr. John Psarouthakis.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 17:54, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Dr. John Psarouthakis.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! :- ) Don 06:41, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Perrygogas. You have new messages at Dcshank's talk page.
Message added 19:08, 9 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. :- ) Don 19:08, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Dr. John Psarouthakis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Dr. John Psarouthakis, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Super Mario Man 11:07, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Apostolos Serletis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Concision of Economic Interventionism

Dear Avenue,

Reading the list of WikiProject: Politics contributors, I noticed you are an active user partly specializing in economics: would you like to offer your opinion on my concision of the lead of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_interventionism?

Duxwing (talk) 17:46, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Perrygogas. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Perrygogas. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issue with "HelpUsStopSpam"

Hello! I noticed you have or had an issue with this user. I have similar issues and started a thread on this talk-page. You are welcome to have a look since we might have a common cause :-). This user "HelpUsStopSpam" started in early 2016 and is therefore a relative newcomer. I don't believe he is a main editor. Rather he seems to be a vigilante of sorts: his contributions are mainly cutting out whole wiki sections which he deems as "spam" based on his subjective and rigid notions of Wikipedia's policies. I don't believe he has the right to dictate unilateral changes in this fashion.TonyMath (talk) 06:00, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is something else. Yes, Wikipedia has a policy with regard to self-citation but it also has policies against being a fanatic!.TonyMath (talk) 07:01, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tony TonyMath! I agree the person is fanatic and strange. Probably he is not new but he was banned using his previous userbame and in 2016 created a new one. What can we do? Periklis Gogas (talk) 09:12, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. You think he was banned?!? It would be good if you had proof of that for all our sakes. If he had ever been banned - for sure, he cannot be a major wiki editor. I have reverted his recent vandalizations though I fully expect him to revert my reversions. The thing is, this guy (I believe he is only one person and does not represent a wikipedia panel) has done fantastic destruction to a lot of well-meaning contributions because he has some hypochondria about what he views as "spam". I am calling his bluff - so far, no major wiki editor has come forth to vindicate his activities but then again you never know. Both of us retain the right to bring this dispute to the wiki committee. If you have any more feedback or new information, please let me know. Best wishes TonyMath (talk) 09:27, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. No response from "HelpUsStopSpam" and no other editor has come forth (as I anticipated). I just added more paragraphs. I partially gave him what he wanted and removed some references myself. I also tried to explain some things to him. He uses number of citations as criteria for rejecting references but these numbers as well as impact factors change a lot when you go from IT to Science to Mathematics. Moreover, it's not part of wikipedia's policy per se. Wikipedia wants citations in good quality journals but it does not insist the reference be heavily cited. Having said all this, I don't think it's over and I cringe at the notion of how much damage he has inflicted on other wiki contributors of good will.TonyMath (talk) 06:04, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, I was not banned ever, and I am simply not online every day. So I did not read any of your messages yet. HelpUsStopSpam (talk) 21:30, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No major editor has come through. One thing is certain: "HelpUsStopSpam" is not a major editor but clearly a self-appointed vigilante. E.g. His recent edits concerning ResearchGate are all part of his admitted "jihad" against it. Yes, there are criticisms and issues against ResearchGate but this is not objective. This is a dangerous for wikipedia: Wikipedia is not amongst the declared players against ResearchGate! Moreover, given the complaints lodged on his talk-page and the litany of the cuts he has made (most of his "contributions"), a good case of Wikipedia:Vandalism and personal attacks and most certainly Wikipedia:Disruptive editing in violation of Wikipedia's policies can be made against "HelpUsStopSpam".TonyMath (talk) 11:10, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I should also mention Wikipedia:Edit warring, in particular "the 3-revert rule". Most of "HelpUsStopSpam"'s contributions are wholesale reversions. TonyMath (talk) 11:20, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Perrygogas, have a look at User_talk:Michael_Hardy. Herein, you will find that "HelpUsStopSpam" is not a major editor by his own admission. He is indeed a vigilante, a fanatic, obviously a damaged individual with issues. He has not been banned as you suggested. What he is as failed individual whose only solace is to suppress others. TonyMath (talk) 08:39, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Perrygogas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Comparative advantage—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perry Gogas: Hello Wtmitchell, you were correct in reverting thank you!

File copyright problem with File:Apostolos Serletis photo2.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Apostolos Serletis photo2.jpeg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 08:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Apostolos Serletis photo2.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Apostolos Serletis photo2.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://profiles.ucalgary.ca/apostolos-serletis. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hi Perrygogas! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Apostolos Serletis that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 21:29, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Kj! noted! Periklis Gogas (talk) 21:36, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]