User talk:Perohanych/2007—2020

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Perohanych, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Veriss (talk) 08:38, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Perohanych, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Wikipedia is not a directory, or a bulletin board for posting résumés. Fan-1967 19:33, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.otif.org/index.php?L=2. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:58, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hincks-Dellcrest Centre

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hincks-Dellcrest Centre, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.hincksdellcrest.org/treatment-centre/index.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:11, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hincks-Dellcrest Centre

A tag has been placed on Hincks-Dellcrest Centre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MLauba (talk) 09:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About Press Releases

You wrote on the above article's talk page:

This is incorrect. Press releases are copyright protected. Just because the instance issuing a press release authorizes its reproduction doesn't mean it renounces copyright.

Of course, you could argue that since reproduction is authorized, we can re-use the material on Wikipedia. This is unfortunately not the case, as any text placed on Wikipedia, except for clear and limited direct quotations marked as such are also open for edition, modification and removal by any editors. A company issuing a press release does not, unless explicitely stated otherwise, authorize any changes in their press release.

As such, this material, as is, is unsuited for Wikipedia. In order to build an article on Hincks-Dellcrest Centre, you can either start one in your own words without using the copy / paste function at all, or try to obtain permission from the Centre following the precise steps highlighted on WP:PERMISSION.

If you need any help, you can start a new section here and add {{helpme}} below it (note the curly brackets), and someone will be along shortly to assist you. Alternatively, you can also leave me a message on my talk page. Best, MLauba (talk) 09:31, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you indeed for the explanation! --Perohanych (talk) 15:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Hampton Halley

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Henry Hampton Halley, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.therestorationmovement.com/halley,hh.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:04, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Perohanych. You have new messages at Talk:Henry Hampton Halley.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Speedy deletion nomination of Political Risk Services

A tag has been placed on Political Risk Services, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jimmy Pitt talk 15:09, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Perohanych. You have new messages at JamesBWatson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Speedy deletion nomination of CONE

A tag has been placed on CONE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Veriss (talk) 08:36, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Perohanych, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Veriss (talk) 08:38, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Perohanych - I wante to personally thank you for your help with Ukrainian translations during the fundraiser. I really appreciate your assistance in getting messages translated and pushed out quickly! Thanks again - Deniz (WMF) (talk) 20:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Logo-Levit.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Logo-Levit.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Stories Project

My name is Victor Grigas and I'm a Storyteller at the Wikimedia Foundation. We're exploring new ways to explain why Wikipedia is so special and we’ve started a Wikipedia Stories Project, where we’re chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community, especially editors and active contributors in the movement like you. I'll be traveling to Wikimania next month to collect stories for our 2011 Fundraiser. While there I'd love the chance to meet with you and hear your thoughts about Wikipedia. We’ll have a schedule of available times for you to sign up if you’re interested, but right now, we’d like to make the initial contact to gauge your interest. Please let me know by emailing me at vgrigas@wikimedia.org or responding on my talk page.

thank you,

Victor Grigas (talk) 00:13, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Science and Technology Center in Ukraine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Science and Technology Center in Ukraine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science and Technology Center in Ukraine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sehmeet singh (talk) 19:00, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikiotics Foundation

A tag has been placed on Wikiotics Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rorshacma (talk) 20:31, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stella Hryniuk

The article Stella Hryniuk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. Still no independent source, despite being tagged for sources for 16 months.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:06, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Logo-Levit.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Logo-Levit.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello after 2013 Wikimania Hong Kong

Hello Yuri! This is SoHome whom you have met during 2013 Wikimania Hong Kong. Wish we would have further discussion and collaboration about Wikimedia projects and Wikipedia articles in the future! --SoHome Jacaranda Lilau (talk) 06:30, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AHK barnstar

	All human knowledge
	Thanks for expanding User:Emijrp/All human knowledge. Your effort is appreciated. emijrp (talk) 23:17, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial moves

If you want to make controversial moves, you need to start a move discussion. You can see how to do it at Wikipedia:Requested moves. If you make controversial moves without discussions at you did with the article on the History of Kiev, they will be reverted. If you edit war on this, you will be blocked. If you use the correct process, there will be a discussion, and you may get your way.--Toddy1 (talk) 14:09, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:LeonidSkirko.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:LeonidSkirko.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Your addition to International reactions to the United States presidential election, 2016 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 17:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the bottom of every page at the site http://president.gov.ua All materials featured on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Please restore the information --Perohanych (talk) 19:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Psychonaut: --Perohanych (talk) 19:28, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Has the proposal at Meta:Terms of use/Creative Commons 4.0 to upgrade the project to CC BY-SA 4.0 been adopted yet? If not, I am not sure that we can legally import CC BY 4.0 text. Please let me know if I'm wrong. —Psychonaut (talk) 20:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, looking further, I see from WP:COMPLIC that CC BY 4.0 is indeed compatible with CC BY-SA 3.0. (It's CC BY-SA 4.0 that causes problems.) I will restore the text; my apologies for the misunderstanding. —Psychonaut (talk) 20:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Perohanych. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sacred-dnipro-cover.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sacred-dnipro-cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats

A tag has been placed on European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://valtioneuvosto.fi/en/article/-/asset_publisher/10616/eurooppalainen-hybridiuhkien-osaamiskeskus-perustettiin-helsinkiin. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Diannaa, the information in European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats was taken from the original PRESS RELEASE, intended for free republishing! This information was repeated dozens of times on different web-sites. Isn't it free? --Perohanych (talk) 16:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oleksiy Karpenko

The article Oleksiy Karpenko has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:57, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tetyana Ramus

A tag has been placed on Tetyana Ramus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cordless Larry: Could you please restore Tetyana Ramus article in my private space like User:Perohanych/Tetyana Ramus as I plan to cleanup it to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. --Perohanych (talk) 20:35, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cordless Larry: Please see above --Perohanych (talk) 06:06, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an administrator, so I can't do this, Perohanych. I see that you have now contacted the deleting administrator. By the way, to understand why your original ping didn't work, see Wikipedia:Notifications#Triggering events. Cordless Larry (talk) 06:44, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cordless Larry: Thank you, Larry! --Perohanych (talk) 08:26, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Alexey Karpenko. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:04, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cordless Larry: Please see Talk:Alexey Karpenko --Perohanych (talk) 20:08, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've already posted there. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:10, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tetyana Ramus has been accepted

Tetyana Ramus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Galobtter (talkó tuó mió) 17:14, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Perohanych. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ivan Franko International Prize

Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. Perohanych, thanks for creating Ivan Franko International Prize!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add more sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:23, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock, due to this host or IP is not an open proxy

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Perohanych (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but AFAIK this IP 176.104.1.162 is not an open proxy. Perohanych (talk) 12:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have confirmed this is an open proxy. It's running services on ports 53, 80, 1723, 2000, 8000, and 8291. The IP address belongs to NETUNDER/undernet. It's possible you are using a VPN or tunnelling service, in which case you'll need to disconnect that in order to edit here. Yamla (talk) 12:38, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Sacred-dnipro-cover.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sacred-dnipro-cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:42, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ARTRAMUS

A tag has been placed on ARTRAMUS, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 22:52, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo ARTRAMUS.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo ARTRAMUS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo ARTRAMUS.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo ARTRAMUS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Artramus

A tag has been placed on Artramus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cordless Larry (talk) 06:36, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sacred-dnipro-cover.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sacred-dnipro-cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo ARTRAMUS.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo ARTRAMUS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Giorgi Sigua

A tag has been placed on Giorgi Sigua, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cordless Larry (talk) 04:27, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:World Economic Forum has been nominated for discussion

Category:World Economic Forum, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:16, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Petro Chernyshov

A tag has been placed on Petro Chernyshov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:40, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Your addition to Inclusive Development Index has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:26, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Tetyana Ramus. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:59, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aeromeh

The article Aeromeh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:29, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Perohanych. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Hewko

A tag has been placed on John Hewko requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.rotaryeclub3310.net/forum/showthread.php?253-New-General-Secretary-for-Rotary-International&s=. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 13:05, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Hewko for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Hewko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Hewko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:30, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Your addition to Rotary International has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:27, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Perohanych/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Perohanych/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.forbes.com/sites/devinthorpe/2014/03/29/john-hewko-head-of-rotary-explains-polios-legacy/#3ec035587375. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Perohanych's persistent copyright violations. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:59, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. --Perohanych (talk) 12:56, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as detailed at this ANI thread (see here for a permalink). Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:43, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vasyl Filipchuk

The article Vasyl Filipchuk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:01, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Perohanych (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Just give me a chance to carefully look through all my edits and delete all potential copyright violations fragments or change them. I did a lot to develop free knowledge in my country. Believe me, that this blocking is very painful for me and I will do all my best to respect copyright laws and rules. I am 58 years old but I am still able to learn and correct my behaviour. Perohanych (talk) 09:51, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

What is copyright?
How is Wikipedia licenced?
Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 11:33, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Copyright can be confusing, but you need to understand it to edit here. If you demonstrate that you understand copyright, you'll be unblocked. One way to do that is to explain your obligations with respect to copyright in your own words. You can do that by adding to (or rewriting) your current unblock request. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:09, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: Thank you for your remark. A have a masters degree in law, so I'm quite aware of what is copyright and copyright violations. The problem with me was that in every post-USSR country there was a very free interpretation of copyright laws, especially regarding the concept of a "brief quotation". I do not think that there is a need to explain in my own words Wikipedia:Copyright violations and Wikipedia:Non-free content, but I carefully read them and I will adhere to them with all possible diligence. --Perohanych (talk) 11:51, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Given the masters degree in law, I am okay if another admin wishes to unblock this user despite them not answering the copyright questions above. --Yamla (talk) 12:05, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Thank you for your questions. Please see my answers below. --Perohanych (talk) 13:03, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: having master degree in law may help not only following copyright but also abusing it. Perohanych is famous for his copyright-laundry which makes photos free.--Anatoliy (Talk) 05:46, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: This remark of Anatoliy does not apply to Wikipedia, and refers to my first steps in the Wikimedia Commons. However, in recent years, I have put a lot of effort into obtaining permissions from authors through the OTRS system and into educating photographers to upload their works to the Wikimedia Commons. --Perohanych (talk) 11:42, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Perohanych (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please see my explainations: * What is copyright? *: Copyright can be described as a collection of rights that belong to the author in connection with the creation and use of works of literature, science, art etc. * How is Wikipedia licenced? *:Texts in Wikipedia are available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, additional terms may also apply. For images, the license must permit commercial reuse and also creating of derivative works. *Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia? *:The use of copyrighted content can result lawsuits and fines. *Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content? *:Generally, we can only use copyrighted material if there is a permission from its author or copyrights owner to use it under the licenses, which are allowed for Wikipedia. In some cases, if no free content exists, it is permissible to "fair use" copyrighted content under certain restrictive conditions. *How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future? *: I plan to carefully check the copyright on any content. I will write articles using "my own words". I will use free content or get in touch with authors or copyrights owners to get their permissions. --Perohanych (talk) 12:57, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Because of your answers to the copyright questions, and after consulting the blocking admin, I have lifted your block. Welcome back, happy editing! Yamla (talk) 14:26, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@The Blade of the Northern Lights: These answers satisfy me. As blocking administrator, do you have any objection if I lift the block? --Yamla (talk) 13:47, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me. I trust your judgment. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 14:19, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Center for International Private Enterprise

A tag has been placed on Center for International Private Enterprise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.cipe.org/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 💵Money💵emoji💵^💸 17:18, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Oleksandr Kardakov

Hello Perohanych,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Oleksandr Kardakov for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 17:30, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Willbb234:!

Is it allowed to put a Speedy Detetion Template to the article, which was created 13 minutes ago and having {{Edited}} Template? :)

Kardakov is notable, for many years he used to be the most influential person in IT sphere in Ukraine. --Perohanych (talk) 17:53, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he may be notable but the article is seriously promotional. Which source said he was the "most influential person in IT sphere in Ukraine"? Maybe a reliable source may help? Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 17:56, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Willbb234: For sources said he was the "most influential person in IT sphere in Ukraine" please see references 7 and 8. --Perohanych (talk) 18:06, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't speak a word of Russian or Ukrainian. Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 18:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Willbb234: So, what do you expect me to do? Just google for "Oleksandr Kardakov" and you'll find 58 000 results --Perohanych (talk) 18:12, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

He might be notable, but it doesn't help that the article resembles a CV more than an encyclopedia article. The biography and awards sections are particularly bad. Unsourced lists of achievements such as this should be avoided. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:15, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I get 265 Google results. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:17, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to read you, @Cordless Larry:! You are right. I had to detele unsourced achievements from the list, and change the style of biography section. Unfortunately I'll be able to do this in a week. As for Google results please try to google for "Александр Кардаков" :) --Perohanych (talk) 18:28, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That returns more results. Unfortunately, the article appears to be a copyright violation of a Ukrainian-language source. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:30, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Oleksandr Kardakov

A tag has been placed on Oleksandr Kardakov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://lb.ua/file/person/4146_kardakov_aleksandr_yurevich.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Cont--Perohanych (talk) 09:43, 12 October 2019 (UTC)est this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:29, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just had no time to place the template {{Translated}}, as I did not finished translation. The speedy deletion template appeared on 13 minutes after I saved the article with {{Edited}} template on it. Dear @Cordless Larry:, instead of helping me and putting {{Translated}} on discussion page, you decided to delete the article. --Perohanych (talk) 09:43, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As you have resumed your copyright violations after your previous block for copyright, I have reinstated your indefinite block. Your continued violations of copyright place the entire project in jeopardy and you were previously given a second chance. I'm very disappointed. --Yamla (talk) 10:31, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: It was not second, but the first chance. What should I do to get a second chance? --Perohanych (talk) 11:52, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your first chance was prior to your initial block. Your second chance was after your first block. You are now requesting a third chance. I'm not opposed to that. All you need to do is request an unblock and indicate how you will adhere to copyright while copying content or translating content from another Wikipedia page. I, or another admin, may then lift your block. For the record, I know you mean well. You work hard on this project. However, your continued copyright issues cannot continue. --Yamla (talk) 12:01, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Thanks for your prompt answer. I have a question. If I create an article by translation from the article in another language version, should I carefully examine if there are copyright violations in the initial version? --Perohanych (talk) 14:40, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I want to be clear, so I'll start by answering a question you didn't ask. Copying or translating content from another source is a copyright concern. If you are copying or translating content from another Wikipedia page (or another Wikipedia project), that's perfectly fine so long as you attribute the source. WP:COPYRIGHT has more details. Now, to answer the question you actually asked. You should be careful here. However, if you are copying content from another Wikipedia source (perhaps, from a different language version), you can safely assume there are no copyright concerns and you are explicitly permitted to do so, provided you properly attribute your copy/translation. For example, you copy content from, say, the Greek version of Wikipedia. You need to attribute your copy, noting that you took the content from the Greek version. If we later discover that the Greek version of the article committed a copyright violation (and assuming it wasn't you who committed the copyright violation), we wouldn't hold that against you. You acted in good faith. --Yamla (talk) 14:48, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have lifted your block, as you have worked hard to understand what you did wrong. Please be careful, though! If anything I said above isn't totally clear to you, please ask additional questions before editing further. I welcome you back and look forward to many more constructive contributions from you. --Yamla (talk) 14:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @Yamla:. I'll do all my best to not disappoint you again! It is never late to learn! --Perohanych (talk) 15:01, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You emailed me questions about uk.wikipedia. Unfortunately, I am not familiar with the Ukrainian Wikipedia project. What you say sounds reasonable to me, but each project (for example, en.wikipedia or uk.wikipedia) has separate sets of rules and requirements. Your best bet is to discuss with a knowledgeable admin there, ideally one who knows about copyright. :) --Yamla (talk) 16:37, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will do that. --Perohanych (talk) 16:44, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 19:50, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddst1: is this source OK? "UN proclaims International Day for Universal Access to Information". Mirage News. 2019-10-17. --Perohanych (talk) 20:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It seems great to me! Thanks! Toddst1 (talk) 19:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tetiana Cherep-Perohanych

Hello, Perohanych,

Thank you for creating Tetiana Cherep-Perohanych.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:15, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tetiana Cherep-Perohanych moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tetiana Cherep-Perohanych, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 16:16, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tetiana Cherep-Perohanych (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

undefined

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article is two lists and a very short introductory paragraph. More detail needed of her life and achievements and how she meets the criteria for a biography on Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tetiana Cherep-Perohanych and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tetiana Cherep-Perohanych, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 09:29, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Perohanych! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 09:29, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Assumed names

A tag has been placed on Category:Assumed names requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Oleksandr Kardakov

I will do so one one condition: you allow me to post the article at the Copyright Cleanup Unit first. If the CCU people say its clean, I'll move it to your userspace and you can work on it in peace. Will that be acceptable to you? TomStar81 (Talk) 07:01, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TomStar81:, great, this is totally acceptable to me! Can you also tell the CCU people to read Requests for undeletion#Oleksandr Kardakov. I clearly explaned that it was me, who created an article about this person in Ukrainian Wikipedia in 2012, Then it was lb.ua who violated my rights in 2018 — they republished content of the Ukrainian Wikipedia article on their website without proper attribution. Then in 2019 I was unfairly and wrongfully accused of copyright infringement of lb.ua. --Perohanych (talk) 08:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Charles Gwynn Senior

Hello Perohanych,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Charles Gwynn Senior for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TomCat4680 (talk) 10:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Olga Masalitina moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Olga Masalitina, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:37, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of National handwriting day

A tag has been placed on National handwriting day requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 11:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of National handwriting day for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National handwriting day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National handwriting day until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:56, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nikolai Udianskyi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nikolai Udianskyi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 11:45, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Lapablo, not a problem, but I just started to create the article, put {{Edited}} template, and during my lunchtime you have made your verdict and moved the stub to the draft space :) Is it according to Wikipedia rules? --Perohanych (talk) 11:59, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perohanych, Thanks for your edit. The move i made was so that it can give you the opportunity to develop and work on the article until when it's ready for mainspace without risk of deletion. And yes it is according to wikipedia guidelines. Lapablo (talk) 13:01, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Lapablo, Thanks for your answer. Good to know! Untill now I was sure, that noone can touch the article while it has the {{Edited}} template. --Perohanych (talk) 13:12, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tetiana Cherep-Perohanych concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tetiana Cherep-Perohanych, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Категорія:Українська художня література

Hello, Perohanych,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Категорія:Українська художня література for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 12:09, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I created the article by mistake. Thank you! --Perohanych (talk) 12:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikolai Udianskyi (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Reads like a press release and not a neutral, formal wiki article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikolai Udianskyi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nikolai Udianskyi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 11:56, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Oleh Barna

Well, this is a draft page about a notable Ukrainian politician, can you please spend your available time expanding it. It needs a very very big expansion. I am sure you do know who is Oleh Barna. The reason why I am asking you to expand the draft page because there is so much information to be added, and I do not want to work on it far too much straight away. --93.76.60.140 (talk) 18:24, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I do not consider seriously requests from anonymous people. --Perohanych (talk) 20:10, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikolai Udianskyi (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikolai Udianskyi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nikolai Udianskyi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 03:02, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikolai Udianskyi (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JavaHurricane were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikolai Udianskyi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nikolai Udianskyi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Java Hurricane 08:36, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nikolai Udianskyi

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nikolai Udianskyi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from Удянский Николай Александрович Украинский ИТ-предприниматель, общественный деятель и ученый, основатель криптобиржи Coinsbit, Биткоин-Форка Bitcoin Ultimatum, доктор философии по праву Удянский Николай Александрович Место рождения Николай Александрович Удянский родился 22.05.1983 в г. Харьков, Украина в семье инженера – испытателя на Харьковском тракторном заводе (отец) и работника торговли (мать). Образование После окончания СШ №53 служил срочную службу в Вооруженных силах Украины, в специальных войсках радиационной, химической и биологической разведки (РХБ). Годы службы 2001-2003. Харьковское профессионально-техническое училище № 9 (1998-2001 год). Первое высшее образование получил в 2009 г., закончив Харьковский национальный автодорожный университет (ХНАДУ) по специальности «Автомобильные дороги и аэродромы». В 2019 г. закончил Харьковский Национальный университет внутренних дел по двум специальностям – Право и Кибербезопасность. В этом же университете защитил кандидатскую диссертацию по праву на тему «Административно-правовые основы взаимоотношений правоохранительных органов в сфере противодействию коррупции». Кандидатскую Николай Удянский защищал в Киеве. Диссертация - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Cb4VAhLKgqhD8R_4jqzzVO-fgic8YMLq/view Профессиональная деятельность В 2003-2006 гг. работал коммерческим директором Торгового дома «Оливин» (Харьков). С 2006 г. по 2014 г. занимался производством и дистрибуцией торговых терминалов. В 2013 г. основал ИТ-компанию Prof-IT, занимающуюся разработкой ИТ-продуктов на блокчейне, в первую очередь - криптовалютных бирж. В 2014 г. основал страховую компания ASSUR. В это же время начал работать в сфере блокчейна, участник всех заметных международных конференций по блокчейну и криптовалютам. В 2018 г. созданная под его руководством криптобиржа Coinsbit была удостоена звания «Лучшая биржа 2018 г.» на престижном международном фестивале Blockchain Live. В 2019 году Николай Удянский заявил о создании международной маркетинговой компании PRMR, высококлассного агентства, которое ставит перед собой цели выше банальных рекламных роликов, а фокусируется на разработке индивидуальных стратегий, необходимых для развития международных стартап проектов. 15 января 2020 в Гонконге, Николаем Удянским и Coinsbit была организована и проведена крупнейшая международная блокчейн конференция Chain2020, посетителями которой стали около 14 000 человек, что сделало ее самой масштабной в истории. При поддержке ведущей биржи криптовалют Coinsbit, соучредителем которой стал Николай Удианский, командой разработчиков Prof-it Blockchain был создан Bitcoin Ultimatum. По версии авторитетного издания Hackernoon, Николай Удянский возглавил список топ 10 блокчейн предпринимателей СНГ. Николай Удянский также является основателем жилого комплекса EVO Сountry Сlub, созданного в 7 км от Харькова как экосистема для комфортного проживания и работы ИТ- специалистов. Н. Удянский уверен, что «в Украине готовят очень талантливых и профессиональных разработчиков». Для того, чтобы они не уезжали из страны, он и создал этот вариант «Кремниевой Долины», где есть идеальные условия для жизни, работы и развития ИТ-специалистов и их семей. Семейное положение Николай состоит в браке и воспитывает троих детей - двоих дочерей и сына. Родители: Удянская Мария Борисовна (07.04.1950), Удянский Александр Леонидович (23.09.1949) Национальность, вероисповедание Николай Удянский по национальности украинец, по вероисповеданию - православный. 15.04.2020. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DGG ( talk ) 13:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikolai Udianskyi has been accepted

Nikolai Udianskyi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Java Hurricane 06:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nikolai Udianskyi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikolai Udianskyi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikolai Udianskyi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. David Gerard (talk) 07:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nikolai Udianskyi

Hello Perohanych. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Nikolai Udianskyi, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Perohanych. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Perohanych|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Кронас (talk) 16:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Кронас thank you. Yes, you are mistaken. The only compensation I receive is a the joy of letting the world know about prominent Ukrainians. --Perohanych (talk) 17:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Olga Masalitina concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Olga Masalitina, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gennadii Vykhodtsev for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gennadii Vykhodtsev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gennadii Vykhodtsev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam-2727 (talk) 22:13, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olga Masalitina (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Statements in the text must have inline citations to show where the statements came from. At least three reliable objective sources should be used.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Olga Masalitina and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Olga Masalitina, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 12:14, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tetiana Cherep-Perohanych

Hello, Perohanych. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tetiana Cherep-Perohanych".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Innovecs (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No acceptable references, only placement on lists and directories, and a promotional interview by the founderon rdo.com, a purely promotional and therefore unreliable web site. You need references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements site.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Innovecs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Innovecs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 11:15, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vasyl Filipchuk (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Martin Urbanec was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vasyl Filipchuk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vasyl Filipchuk, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:50, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vasyl Filipchuk has been accepted

Vasyl Filipchuk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:13, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]