User talk:Pepeh17

Pepeh17, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Pepeh17! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Pepeh17! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft to article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stroma (philosophy)

The article Stroma (philosophy) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article doesn't add to material already covered in Materialism#Defining 'matter' but does not meet CSD A10 criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RegistryKey^(RegEdit) 01:42, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We can find hundreds, maybe thousands of references to the term philosophical within philosophical materialism. in a quick search. It is not a superficial term, on the contrary, it is a pillar of the way of persar of the alive beings including humans. and of course it is expandable. For example, Urbina's treatise on stromatology. But it happened that at the beginning I made a too simple description due to my lack of experience, thinking of extending it later Pepeh17 (talk) 04:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me a term undervalued by current philosophy. But it is very powerful and realistic despite the simplicity of its approach. Yes it is a neologism, but its author has already passed away Pepeh17 (talk) 04:52, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stroma (philosophy) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stroma (philosophy) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stroma (philosophy) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RegistryKey^(RegEdit) 05:54, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Stroma (philosophy). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OPS! Sorry!. I am not sure when the end of the discussion is. This has been the reason. When do I know the discussion is over? Pepeh17 (talk) 14:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You need can follow or contribute to the discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stroma (philosophy). Singularity42 (talk) 15:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will do so. Pepeh17 (talk) 20:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Pepeh17! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, From draft to publication Stroma, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stroma (philosophy)

Hello, Pepeh17. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stroma (philosophy), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pepeh17,

I was thinking of submitting this draft for AFC review but wanted to check with you first in case you were continuing to work on it. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:47, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Liz! I will add the two types of philosophy derived from the philosophical stroma concept. As in Wikipedia in Spanish. Thanks for the warning

Pepeh17 (talk) 22:49, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stroma (philosophy)

Hello, Pepeh17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Stroma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:56, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks Liz!

I haven't been able to focus on that topic. Pepeh17 (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]